SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Anandamide;
  • fatty acid amidohydrolase;
  • palmitoylethanolamide
  • The ability of a series of homologues and analogues of palmitoylethanolamide to inhibit the uptake and fatty acid amidohydrolase (FAAH)-catalysed hydrolysis of [3H]-anandamide ([3H]-AEA) has been investigated.

  • Palmitoylethanolamide and homologues with chain lengths from 12–18 carbon atoms inhibited rat brain [3H]-AEA metabolism with pI50 values of ∼5. Homologues with chain lengths leqslant R: less-than-or-eq, slanteight carbon atoms gave <20% inhibition at 100 μM.

  • R-palmitoyl-(2-methyl)ethanolamide, palmitoylisopropylamide and oleoylethanolamide inhibited [3H]-AEA metabolism with pI50 values of 5.39 (competitive inhibition), 4.89 (mixed type inhibition) and 5.33 (mixed type inhibition), respectively.

  • With the exception of oleoylethanolamide, the compounds did not produce dramatic inhibition of [3H]-WIN 55,212-2 binding to human CB2 receptors expressed on CHO cells. Palmitoylethanolamide, palmitoylisopropylamide and R-palmitoyl-(2-methyl)ethanolamide had modest effects upon [3H]-CP 55,940 binding to human CB1 receptors expressed on CHO cells.

  • Most of the compounds had little effect upon the uptake of [3H]-AEA into C6 and/or RBL-2H3 cells. However, palmitoylcyclohexamide (100 μM) and palmitoylisopropylamide (30 and 100 μM) produced more inhibition of [3H]-AEA uptake than expected to result from inhibition of [3H]-AEA metabolism alone.

  • In intact C6 cells, palmitoylisopropylamide and oleoylethanolamide inhibited formation of [3H]-ethanolamine from [3H]-AEA to a similar extent as AM404, whereas palmitoylethanolamide, palmitoylcyclohexamide and R-palmitoyl-(2-methyl)ethanolamide were less effective.

  • These data provide useful information upon the ability of palmitoylethanolamide analogues to act as ‘entourage’ compounds. Palmitoylisopropylamide may prove useful as a template for design of compounds that reduce the cellular accumulation and metabolism of AEA without affecting either CB1 or CB2 receptors.

British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 133, 1263–1275; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704199