SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Appleby R.F. & Davies W.J. (1983) A possible evaporation site in the guard cell wall and the influence of leaf structure on the humidity response by stomata of woody plants. Oecologia 56, 3040.
  • Buckley T.N. & Mott K.A. (2002) Stomatal water relations and the control of hydraulic supply and demand. Progress in Botany63, 309– 325.
  • Cowan I.R. (1994) As to the mode of action of the guard cells in dry air. In Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis (eds E.-D. Schultze & M. M. Caldwell), pp. 205229. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Cowan I.R. (1977) Stomatal behaviour and environment. Advances in Botanical Research4, 117127.
  • Cowan I.R. & Farquhar G.D. (1977) Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. In Integration of Activity in the Higher Plant (ed. D. H. Jennings), pp. 471505. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Dewar R.C. (1995) Interpretation of an empirical model for stomatal conductance in terms of guard cell function. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 365372.
  • Farquirar G.D. (1978) Feed forward responses of stomata to humidity. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology5, 787– 800.
  • Franks P.J., Buckley T.N., Shope J.C. & Mott K.A. (2001) Guard cell pressure and volume measured concurrently by confocal microscopy and the cell pressure probe. Plant Physiology 125, 15771684.
  • Franks P.J., Cowan I.R. & Farquhar G.D. (1997) The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air vapour pressure deficit: Information revealed by different experimental procedures with two rainforest trees. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 142145.
  • Franks P.J., Cowan I.R. & Farquhar G.D. (1998) A study of stomatal mechanics using the cell pressure probe. Plant, Cell and Environment 21, 94100.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00248.x
  • Franks P.J., Cowan I.R., Tyerman S.D., Cleary A.L., Lloyd J. & Farquhar G.D. (1995) Guard cell pressure/aperture characteristics measured with the pressure probe. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 795800.
  • Grantz D.A. (1990) Plant response to atmospheric humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 13, 667669.
  • Grantz D.A. & Schwartz A. (1988) Guard cells of Commelina communis L. do not respond metabolically to osmotic stress in isolated epidermis: implications for stomatal responses to drought and humidity. Planta 174, 166173.
  • Haefner J.W., Buckley T.N. & Mott K.A. (1997) A spatially explicit model of patchy stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 10871097.
  • Johansson I., Karlsson M., Johanson U., Larsson C. & Kjellbom P. (2000) The role of aquaporisn in cellular and whole plant water balance. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1465, 324342.
  • Kappen L. & Haeger S. (1991) Stomatal responses of Tradescantia albiflora to changing air humidity in light and in darkness. Journal of Experimental Botany 42, 979986.
  • Kappen L., Schultz G. & Vanselow R. (1994) Direct observations of stomatal movements. In Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis (eds E.-D. Schulze & M. M. Caldwell), pp. 231246. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Lange O.L., Losch R., Schulze E.-D. & Kappen L. (1971) Responses of stomata to changes in humidity. Planta 100, 7686.
  • Maier-Maercker U. (1983) the role of peristomatal transpiration in the mechanism of stomatal movement. Plant, Cell and Environment 6, 369380.
  • Meidner H. (1986) Cuticular conductance and the humidity response of stomata. Journal of Experimental Botany 37, 517525.
  • Monteith J.L. (1995) A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 357364.
  • Mott K.A. & Franks P.J. (2001) The role of epidermal turgor in stomatal interactions following a local perturation in humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 24, 657662.
  • Mott K.A. & Parkhurst D.F. (1991) Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 509515.
  • Mott K.A., Denne F. & Powell J. (1997) Interactions among stomata in response to perturbations in humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 10981107.
  • Mott K.A., Shope J.C. & Buckley T.N. (1999) Effects of humidity on light-induced stomatal opening: evidence for hydraulic coupling among stomata. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 12071213.
  • Nonami H., Schulze E.-D. & Ziegler H. (1990) Mechanisms of stomatal movement in response to air humidity, irradiance and xylem water potential. Planta 183, 5764.
  • Raschke K. & Kuhl U. (1970) Stomatal responses to changes in atmospheric humidity and water supply: experiments with leaf sections of Zea mays L. Planta 87, 3648.
  • Shackel K.A. (1987) Direct measurement of turgor and osmotic potential in individual epidermal cells. Plant Physiology 83, 719722.
  • Sharpe P.J.H., Wu H. & Spence R.D. (1987) Stomatal mechanics. In Stomatal Function (eds E. Zieger, G. D. Farquhar & I. R. Cowan), pp. 91114. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  • Sheriff D.W. (1984) Epidermal transpiration and stomatal responses to humidity: some hypotheses explored. Plant, Cell and Environment 7, 669677.
  • Sperry J.S. (2000) Hydraulic constraints on plant gas exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology104, 13– 23.
  • Tyerman S.D., Bohnert H.J., Maurel C., Steudle E. & Smith J.A.C. (1999) Plant aquaporins: their molecular biology, biophysics and significance for plant water relations. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 10551071.DOI: 10.1093/jexbot/50.suppl_1.1055
  • Tyree M.T. & Yianoulis P. (1980) The site of water evaporation from sub-stomatal cavities, liquid path resistances and hydroactive stomatal closure. Annals of Botany 45, 175193.