Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: douglas.morris@lakeheadu.ca
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Density-dependent foraging effort of Deer Mice (Peromyscus maniculatus)
Article first published online: 20 DEC 2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00569.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Davidson, D. L. and Morris, D. W. (2001), Density-dependent foraging effort of Deer Mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Functional Ecology, 15: 575–583. doi: 10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00569.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 20 DEC 2001
- Article first published online: 20 DEC 2001
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Competition;
- giving-up density;
- quitting-harvest rate
Summary
- 1Little is known about how population density affects the foraging behaviour of individuals. Simple models are developed to predict the net effect of density on the quitting-harvest rates of optimal foragers. The theory was tested with experiments that measured the foraging behaviour of free-ranging Deer Mice under control and reduced densities.
- 2An increased density of conspecifics may (a) reduce the costs of foraging by increasing competition for resources (reduces the energetic state of the forager; competition hypothesis) or (b) increase the costs of foraging by increasing the value of time spent on social activities (social benefits hypothesis).
- 3A reduction in the costs of foraging caused by competition will reduce the quitting-harvest rate of an optimal forager, whereas an increase in the value of alternative activities will increase the quitting-harvest rate. Both hypotheses predict a reduction in optimal foraging time with increased density.
- 4The hypothesis that applies to Deer Mice (Peromyscus maniculatus, Wagner) was assessed by measuring their foraging activity and quitting-harvest rates at control and reduced population densities on four study plots located in boreal forest in north-western Ontario, Canada.
- 5Deer Mice increased their per capita foraging activity and their quitting-harvest rates when population densities were reduced. The results confirm the very important role of competition in the behaviour of optimal foragers.

1365-2435/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=c8b848a8f001fdfa90240fe2ab26b1f04b6fe8e4)
1365-2435/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=2cf6e00d281371851f86902da3937ac5884bcfe0)
1365-2435/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=571713c051a4c9b4843f1aa4a484de7ca8661854)