A retrospective study of canine and feline cutaneous vasculitis
Article first published online: 21 DEC 2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.0959-4493.2001.00268.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Nichols, P. R., Morris, D. O. and Beale, K. M. (2001), A retrospective study of canine and feline cutaneous vasculitis. Veterinary Dermatology, 12: 255–264. doi: 10.1046/j.0959-4493.2001.00268.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 21 DEC 2001
- Article first published online: 21 DEC 2001
- (Received 18 December 2000; accepted 25 May 2001)
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- cat;
- cutaneous vasculitis;
- dapsone;
- dog;
- pentoxifylline;
- sulfasalazine
Abstract
Twenty-one cases of cutaneous vasculitis in small animals (dogs and cats) were reviewed, and cases were divided by clinical signs into five groups. An attempt was made to correlate clinical types of vasculitis with histological inflammatory patterns, response to therapeutic drugs and prognosis. Greater than 50% of the cases were idiopathic, whereas five were induced by rabies vaccine, two were associated with hypersensitivity to beef, one was associated with lymphosarcoma and two were associated with the administration of oral drugs (ivermectin and itraconazole). Only the cases of rabies vaccine-induced vasculitis in dogs had a consistent histological inflammatory pattern (mononuclear/nonleukocytoclastic) and were responsive to combination therapy with prednisone and pentoxifylline, or to prednisone alone. Most cases with neutrophilic or neutrophilic/eosinophilic inflammatory patterns histologically did not respond to pentoxifylline, but responded to sulfone/sulfonamide drugs, prednisone, or a combination of the two.

1365-3164/asset/VDE_left.gif?v=1&s=1978f80c42564707183a312a6a0e496edc42977a)
1365-3164/asset/VDE_centre.gif?v=1&s=311fa7b14f337dedb723845dfc12be45a2063e4d)
1365-3164/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=28f4866eeef2483f7c0d803a6248d28f7df0447d)