SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Amato G, Gatesy J, Brazaitis P (1998) PCR assays of variable nucleotide sites for idengification of conservation units. In: Molecular Approaches to Ecology and Evolution: an Example from Caiman (eds DeSalleR, SchierwaterB), pp. 177180. Birkhauser, Basel.
  • Avise JC (1989) A role for molecular geneticists in the recognition and conservation of endangered species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 279281.
  • Avise JC (1994) Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Avise JC, Arnold J, Ball RM et al. 1987) Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 489522.
  • Balmford A, Mace GM, Ginsberg JR (1998) The challenges to conservation in a changing world: putting processes on the map. In: Conservation in a Changing World (eds MaceGM, BalmfordA, GinsbergJR), pp. 128. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Barrowclough GF, Flesness NR (1996) Species, subspecies, and races: the problem of units of management in conservation. Wild Mammals in Captivity (eds KeimanGG, AllenM, HarrisH), pp. 247254. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Barton NH (2001) Speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 325.
  • Behnke RJ (1995) Morphology and systematics. In: Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation (eds NielsenJL, PowersDA), pp. 4143. Symposium 17. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Bernatchez L (1995) A role for molecular systematics in defining evolutionary significant units in fishes. In: Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation (eds NielsenJL, PowersGA), pp. 114132. Symposium 17. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Bernatchez L, Dodson JJ (1994) Phylogenetic relationships among palearctic and nearctic whitefish (Coregonus sp.) populations as revealed by mitochondrial DNA variation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 51, 240251.
  • Bowen BW (1998) What is wrong with ESUs? The gap between evolutionary theory and conservation principles. Journal of Shellfish Research, 17, 13551358.
  • Bowen BW (1999) Preserving genes, species, or ecosystems? Healing the fractured foundations of conservation policy. Molecular Ecology, 8, S5S10.
  • Coates DJ (2000) Defining conservation units in a rich and fragmented flora: implications for the management of genetic resources and evolutionary processes in south-west Australian plants. Australian Journal of Botany, 48, 329339.
  • Cracraft J (1983) Species concepts and speciation analysis. In: Current Ornithology (ed. JohnsonRF), pp. 159187. Plenum Press, New York.
  • Cracraft J (1989) Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation. In: Speciation and its Consequences (eds DOtte D, Endler JA), pp. 2859. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Cracraft J, Feinstein J, Helm-Bychowski C (1998) Sorting out tigers (Panthera tigris): mitochondrial sequences, nuclear inserts, systematics, and conservation genetics. Animal Conservation, 1, 139150.
  • Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000) Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 390395.
  • Davis JI, Nixon KC (1992) Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Systematic Biology, 41, 421435.
  • Dimmick WW, Ghedotti MJ, Grose MJ, Maglia AM, Meinhardt DJ, Pennock DS (1999) The importance of systematic biology in defining units of conservation. Conservation Biology, 13, 653660.
  • Dizon AE, Lockyer C, Perrin WF et al. (1992) Rethinking the stock concept: a phylogeographic approach. Conservation Biology, 6, 2436.
  • Dizon AE, Taylor BL, O’Corry-Crowe GM (1995) Why statistical power is necessary to link analyses of molecular variation to decisions about population structure. In: Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation (eds NielsenJL, PowersGA), pp. 288294. Symposium 17. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Duvernell DD, Turner BJ (1998) Evolutionary genetics of Death valley pupfish populations: mitochondrial DNA sequence variation and population structure. Molecular Ecology, 7, 279288.
  • Dyke AS, Prest VK (1987) Late Wisconsinian and Holocene history of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Geographic Physique et Quanternaire, 41, 237263.
  • Goldstein PZ, DeSalle R, Amato G, Vogler AP (2000) Conservation genetics at the species boundary. Conservation Biology, 14, 120131.
  • Hey J (2001) The mind of the species problem. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 326329.
  • Holling CS (1978) Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Hull DL (1980) Individuality and selection. Annual Reviews in Ecology and Systematics, 11, 311332.
  • Joseph L, Moritz C (1994) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of birds in eastern Australian rainforests: first fragments. Australian Journal of Zoology, 42, 385403.
  • Karl SA, Bowen BW (1999) Evolutionary significant units versus geopolitical taxonomy: molecular systematics of an endangered species. Conservation Biology, 13, 990999.
  • Lande R, Barrowclough GF (1987) Effective popluation size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. In: Viable Populations for Conservation (ed. SouleME), pp. 87124. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Lande R, Shannon S (1996) The role of genetic variation in adaptation and population persistance in a changing environment. Evolution, 50, 434437.
  • Legge JT, Roush R, DeSalle R, Vogler AP, May B (1996) Genetic criteria for establishing evolutionarily significant units in Cryan’s Buckmoth. Conservation Biology, 10, 8598.
  • Losos JB, Jackman TR, Larson A, De Queiroz K, Rodriguez-Schettino L (1998) Contingency and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of island lizards. Science, 279, 21152118.
  • Lu G, Basley DJ, Bernatchez L (2001) Contrasting patterns of mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite introgressive hybridization between lineages of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis): relevance for speciation. Molecular Ecology, 10, 965985.
  • Lu G, Bernatchez L (1998) Experimental evidence for reduced hybrid viability between dwarf and normal ecotypes of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis Mitchill). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 10251030.
  • Lu G, Bernatchez L (1999) Correlated trophic specialization and genetic divergence in sympatric lake whitefish ecotypes (Coregonus clupeaformis). Support for the ecological speciation hypothesis. Evolution, 53, 14911505.
  • Lynch M (1996) A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues. In: Conservation Genetics: Case Histories from Nature (eds AviseJC, HamrickJ), pp. 471501. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Lynch M, Pfrender M, Spitze K et al. (1999) The quantitative and molecular genetic architecture of a subdivided species. Evolution, 53, 100110.
  • Matthews GM, Waples RS (1991) Status Review for Snake River Spring and Summer Chinook Salmon. NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administartion) Technical Memorandum NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service) F/NWC-200. Northwest Fisheries Center, Seattle.
  • Mayden RL, Wood RM (1995) Systematics, Species Concepts, and the evolutionarily significant unit in biodiversity and conservation biology. In: Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation (eds NielsenJL, PowersGA), pp. 58113. Symposium 17. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Mayr E (1960) The emergence of evolutionary novelties. In: Evolution After Darwin: the Evolution of Life (ed. TaxS), pp. 349380. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • Mayr E, Ashlock PD (1991) Principles in Systematic Zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • McElhany P, Ruckelshaus M, Ford MJ, Wainwright T, Bjorkstedt E (2000) Viable Salmonid Populations and the Recovery of Evolutionarily Significant Units. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-42. Northwest Fisheries Center, Seattle.
  • Moritz C (1994a) Defining ‘evolutionary significant units’ for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 373375.
  • Moritz C (1994b) Applications of mitochondrial DNA analysis in conservation: critical review. Molecular Ecology, 3, 401411.
  • Moritz C (1999) A molecular perspective of biodiversity. In: The Biology of Biodiversity (ed. KatoS), Springer Verlag, Tokyo.
  • Moritz C, Joseph L, Adams M (1993) Cryptic genetic diversity in an endemic rainforest skink (Gnypetoscincus queenslandiae). Biological Conservation, 2, 412425.
  • Moritz C, Lavery S, Slade R (1995) Using allele frequency and phylogeny to define units for conservation and management. In: Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation (eds NielsenJL PowersGA), pp. 249262. Symposium 17. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Mundy PR, Backman TWH, Berkson JM (1995) Selection of conservation units for Pacific salmon: lessons from the Columbia River. In: Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation (eds NielsenJL, PowersGA), pp. 1828. Symposium 17. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Neigel J, Avise JC (1986) Phylogenetic relationships of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. In: Evolutionary Processes and Theory (eds NevoE, KarlinS), pp. 515534. Academic Press, New York.
  • Nielsen JL, Powers GA, eds (1995) Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation. Symposium 17. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Paetkau D (1999) Using genetics to idengify intraspecific conservation units: a critique of current methods. Conservation Biology, 13, 15071509.
  • Palmer JD (1992) Mitochondrial DNA in plant systematics: applications and limitations. In: Molecular Systematics of Plants (eds SoltisPS, SoltisDE, DoyleJJ), pp. 3649. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Pennock DS, Dimmick WW (1997) Critique of the evolutionarily significant unit as a definition for ‘distinct population segments’ under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conservation Biology, 11, 611619.
  • Pigeon D, Chouinard A, Bernatchez L (1997) Multiple modes of speciation involved in the parallel evolution of sympatric morpho-types of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis). Evolution, 53, 196205.
  • De Queiroz K (1998) The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation. In: Endless Forms. Species and Speciation (eds HowardDJ, BerlocherSH), pp. 5775. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Ricker WE (1972) Hereditary and environmental factors affecting certain salmonid populations. In: The Stock Concept in Pacific Salmon (eds SimonRC, LarkinPA), pp. 19160. University of British Columbia, Institute of Animal Resource Ecology, Vancouver.
  • Roe KJ, Lydeard C (1998) Species delineation and the idengification of evolutionarily significant units: lessons from the freshwater mussel genus Potamilus (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Journal of Shellfish Research, 17, 13591363.
  • Ryder OA (1986) Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 1, 910.
  • Schluter D (2000) The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  • Schluter D (2001) Ecology and the origin of species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 372380.
  • Schneider C, Cunningham M, Moritz C (1998) Comparative phylogeography and the history of endemic vertebrates in the Wet Tropics rainforests of Australia. Molecular Ecology, 7, 487498.
  • Simpson GG (1961) Principals of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • Smith TB, Holder K, Girman D, O’Keefe K, Larison B, Chan Y (2000) Comparative avian phylogeography of Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea mountains: implications for conservation. Molecular Ecology, 9, 15051516.
  • Taylor EB (1999) Species pairs of north temperate freshwater fishes: evolution, taxonomy, and conservation. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 9, 299324.
  • Taylor EB, Bentzen P (1993) Evidence for multiple origins and symaptric divergence of trophic ecotypes of smelt Osmerus. Lake Utopia, south-western New Brunswick, Canada. Molecular Ecology, 2, 345357.
  • Templeton AR (1989) The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective. In: Speciation and its Consequences (eds OtteD, EndlerJA), pp. 327. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
  • Turelli M, Barton NH, Coyne JA (2001) Theory and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 330343.
  • Vogler AP, DeSalle R (1994) Diagnosing units of conservation management. Conservation Biology, 6, 170178.
  • Walters CJ, Holling CS (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology, 71, 20602068.
  • Waples RS (1991) Pacific Salmon, Oncorhynchus spp. & the definition of ‘species’ under the endangered species act. Marine Fisheries Reviews, 53, 1122.
  • Waples RS (1995) Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. In: Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation (eds NielsenJL PowersGA), pp. 827. Symposium 17. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Waples RS (1998) Evolutionarily significant units, distinct population segments, and the endangered species act: reply to Pennock and Dimmick. Conservation Biology, 12, 718721.
  • Waples RS, Jones RP, Beckman BR, Swan GA (1991) Status Review for Snake River Sockeye Salmon. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS F/NWC-195. Northwest Fisheries Center, Seattle.
  • Wiley EO (1978) The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Systematic Zoology, 27, 1726.
  • Wirgin I, Oppermann T, Stabile J (2001) Genetic divergence of robust redhorse Moxostoma robustum (Cypriniformes Catostomidae) from the Oconee River and the Savannah River based on mitochondrial DNA control region sequences. Copeia, 2001, 526530.