SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Albach DC, Soltis DE, Chase MW, Soltis PS. 2001a. Phylogenetic placement of the enigmatic angiosperm Hydrostachys. Taxon 50: 781805.
  • Albach DC, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG. 2001b. Phylogenetic analysis of the Asteridae based on sequences of four genes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 88: 163212.
  • Anderberg AA, Rydin C, Källersjö M. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in the order Ericales s. l. analyses of molecular data from five genes from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes. American Journal of Botany 89: 677687.
  • Anderberg AA, Ståhl B, Källersjö M. 2000. Maesaceae, a new primuloid family in the order Ericales s.l. Taxon 49: 183197.
  • APG. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531553.
  • Appelquist WL, Wallace RS. 2000. Phylogeny of the Madagascan endemic family Didieraceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 221: 157166.
  • Backlund M, Oxelman B, Bremer B. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentianales based on ndhF and rbcL sequences, with particular reference to the Loganiaceae. American Journal of Botany 87: 10291043.
  • Barkman TJ, Chenery G, McNeal JR, Lyons-Weiler J, DePamphilis CW. 2000. Independent and combined analyses of sequences from all three genomic compartments converge on the root of flowering plant phylogeny. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 1316613171.
  • Beardsley PM, Olmstead RG. 2002. Redefining Phrymacae: the placement of Mimulus, tribe Mimuleae, and Phzrma. American Journal of Botany 89: 10931102.
  • Bell CD, Edwards EJ, Kim S-T, Donoghue MJ. 2001. Dipsacales phylogeny based on chloroplast DNA sequences. Harvard Papers in Botany 6: 481489.
  • Berry PE, Savolainen V, Sytsma KJ, Hall JC, Chase MW. 2001. Lissocarpa is sister to Diospyros (Ebenaceae). Kew Bulletin 56: 725729.
  • Bortenschlager S. 1973. Morphologie pollinique des Phytolaccaceae. Pollen et Spores 15: 227253.
  • Bradford JC, Barnes RW. 2001. Phylogenetics and classification of Cunoniaceae (Oxalidales) using chloroplast DNA sequences and morphology. Systematic Botany 26: 354385.
  • Bremer K. 2000. Phylogenetic nomenclature and the new ordinal system of the angiosperms. In: NordenstamB, El-GhazalyG, KassasM, LaurentTC, eds. Plant systematics for the 21st century. London: Portland Press, 125133.
  • Bremer K. 2002. Gondwanan evolution of the grass alliance of families (Poales). Evolution 56: 13741387.
  • Bremer K, Backlund A, Sennblad B, Swenson U, Andreasen K, Hjertson M, Lundberg J, Backlund M, Bremer B. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of 100+ genera and 50+ families of euasterids based on morphological and molecular data with notes on possible higher level morphological synapomorphies. Plant Systematics and Evolution 229: 137169.
  • Bremer B, Bremer K, Heidari N, Erixon P, Anderberg AA, Olmstead RG, Källersjö M, Barkhordarian E. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on three coding and three non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: 274301.
  • Briggs BG, Johnson LAS. 2000. Hopkinsiaceae and Lyginiaceae, two new families of Poales in western Australia, with revisions of Hopkinsia and Lyginia. Telopea 8: 477502.
  • Caddick LR, Rudall PJ, Wilkin P, Chase MW. 2000. Yams and their allies: systematics of Dioscoreales. In: WilsonKL, MorrisonDA, eds. Systematics and evolution of monocots. Proceedings of the 2nd International Monocot Symposium. Melbourne: CSIRO, 475487.
  • Caddick LR, Rudall PJ, Wilkin P, Hedderson TAJ, Chase MW. 2002a. Phylogenetics of Dioscoreales based on combined analyses of morphological and molecular data. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 138: 123144.
  • Caddick LR, Wilkin P, Rudall PJ, Hedderson TAJ, Chase MW. 2002b. Yams reclassified: a recircumscription of Dioscoreaceae and Dioscoreales. Taxon 51: 103114.
  • Chase MW, Duvall MR, Hills HG, Conran JG, Cox AV, Eguiarte LE, Hartwell J, Fay MF, Caddick LR, Cameron KM, Hoot S. 1995a. Molecular systematics of Lilianae. In: RudallPJ, CribbPJ, CutlerDF, HumphriesCJ, eds. Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. 109137.
  • Chase MW, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG, Morgan D, Les DH, Mishler BD, Duvall MR, Price RA, Hills HG, Qiu YL, Kron KA, Rettig JH, Conti E, Palmer JD, Manhart JR, Sytsma KJ, Michael HJ, Kress WJ, Karol KA, Clark WD, Hedrén M, Gaut BS, Jansen RK, Kim KJ, Wimpee CF, Smith JF, Furnier GR, Strauss SH, Xiang QY, Plunkett GM, Soltis PS, Swensen SM, Williams SE, Gadek PA, Quinn CJ, Eguiarte LE, Golenberg E, Learn GH, Graham SW Jr, Barrett SCH, Dayanandan S, Albert VA. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528580.
  • Chase MW, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Rudall PJ, Fay MF, Hahn WJ, Sullivan S, Joseph J, Molvray M, Kores PJ, Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ, Pires JC. 2000. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: An assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. In: WilsonKL, MorrisonDA, eds. Systematics and evolution of monocots. Proceedings of the 2nd International Monocot Symposium. Melbourne: CSIRO, 316.
  • Chase MW, Stevenson WDW, Wilkin P, Rudall PJ. 1995b. Monocot systematics: a combined analysis. In: RudallPJ, CribbPJ, CutlerDF, HumphriesCJ, eds. Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. 685730.
  • Chase MW, Zmartzty S, Lledó MD, Wurdack KJ, Swensen SM, Fay MF. 2002. When in doubt, put it in Flacourtiaceae: a molecular phylogenetic analysis based on plastid rbcL DNA sequences. Kew Bulletin 57: 141181.
  • Clausing G, Renner SS. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics of Melastomataceae and Memecylaceae: implications for character evolution. American Journal of Botany 88: 486498.
  • Conti E, Baum D, Sytsma K. 1999. Phylogeny of Crypteroniaceae and related families: implications for morphology and biogeography. In: XVI International Botanical Congress, abstracts. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden, 250.
  • Conti E, Litt A, Sytsma KJ. 1996. Circumscription of Myrtales and their relationships to other rosids: evidence from rbcL sequence data. American Journal of Botany 83: 221233.
  • Contreras VR, Scogin R, Philbrick CT. 1993. A phytochemical study of selected Podostemaceae: systematic implications. Aliso 13: 513520.
  • Cronquist A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Cuénoud P, Savolainen V, Powell M, Grayer RJ, Chase MW. 2002. Molecular phylogenetics of the Caryophyllales based on combined analyses of 18S rDNA and rbcL, atpB and matK sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 132144.
  • Cusset C, Cusset G. 1988. Étude sur les Podostemales. 9. Delimitation taxinomiques dans les Tristichaceae. Bulletin du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle, Séries 4 (10): 149175.
  • Dahlgren R. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 119149.
  • Dahlgren RMT, Clifford HT, Yeo PF. 1985. The families of the monocotyledons: structure, evolution, and taxonomy. Berlin: Spinger-Verlag.
  • Dayanandan S, Ashton PS, Williams SM, Primack RB. 1999. Phylogeny of the tropical tree family Dipterocarpaceae based on nucleotide sequences of the chloroplast rbcL gene. American Journal of Botany 86: 11821190.
  • Doweld AB. 2001. Tentamen Systematis Plantarum Vascularium (Tracheophytorum). Moscow: GEOS.
  • Doyle JA, Endress PK. 2000. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: comparison and combination with molecular data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (6 Suppl.): S121S153.
  • Duvall MR, Clegg MT, Chase MW, Clark WD, Kress WJ, Hills HG, Eguiarte LE, Smith JF, Gaut BS, Zimmer EA, Learn GH. 1993. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the monocotyledons constructed from rbcL sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 607619.
  • Engler A. 1930. Saxifragaceae. In: EnglerA, PrantlK, eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 18a. Leipzig: W. Engelman, 74226.
  • Farris JS, Albert VA, Källersjö M, Lipscomb D, Kluge AG. 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12: 99124.
  • Fay MF, Bremer B, Prance GT, Van Der Bank M, Bridson D, Chase MW. 2000a. Plastid rbcL sequence data show Dialypetalanthus to be a member of Rubiaceae. Kew Bulletin 55: 853864.
  • Fay MF, Rudall PJ, Sullivan S, Stobart KL, De Bruijn AY, Reeves G, Qamaruz-Zaman F, Hong W-P, Joseph J, Hahn WJ, Conran JG, Chase MW. 2000b. Phylogenetic studies of Asparagales based on four plastic DNA loci. In: WilsonKL, MorrisonDA, eds. Systematics and evolution of monocots. Proceedings of the 2nd International Monocot Symposium. Melbourne: CSIRO, 360371.
  • Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783791.
  • Fishbein M, Hufford L, Soltis DE. 2003. Phylogeny of Saxifragales: patterns of floral evolution and taxonomic revision. Systematic Botany in press.
  • Fuse S, Tamura MN. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis of the plastid matK gene with emphasis on Melanthiaceae sensu lato. Plant Biology 2: 415427.
  • Givnish TJ, Evans TM, Pires JC, Sytsma KJ. 1999. Polyphyly and convergent morphological evolution in Commelinales and Commelinidae: evidence from rbcL sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12: 360385.
  • Graham SW, Olmstead RG. 2000. Evolutionary significance of an unusual chloroplast DNA inversion found in two basal angiosperm lineages. Current Genetics 37: 183188.
  • Gregory T, Chandler GT, Bayer RJ. 2000. Phylogenetic placement of the enigmatic Western Australian genus Emblingia based on rbcL sequences. Plant Species Biology 15: 6772.
  • Greuter W, McNeill J, Barrie FR, Burdet HM, Demoulin V, Filgueiras TS, Nicolson DH, Silva PC, Skog JE, Trehane P, Turland NJ, Hawksworth DL. 2000. International code of botanical nomenclature (Saint Louis Code) adopted by the Sixteenth International Botanical Congress, St. Louis, Missouri, July – August 1999. Regnum Vegetabile 138: 1474.
  • Haberle RC. 1998. Phylogenetic systematics of Pseudonemacladus and the North American cyphioids (Campanulaceae sensu lato). MSc Thesis, Northern Arizona University.
  • Hall JC, Sytsma KJ, Iltis HH. 2002. Phylogeny of Cappar-aceae and Brassicaceae based on chloroplast sequence data. American Journal of Botany 89: 18261842.
  • Hibsch-Jetter C, Soltis DE, MacFarlane TD. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of Eremosyne pectinata (Saxifragaceae s.l.) based on rbcL sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 204: 225232.
  • Hillis DM. 1996. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383: 130.
  • Hoot SB, Magallon-Puebla S, Crane PR. 1999. Phylogeny of basal eudicots based on three molecular data sets: atpB, rbcL and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 119131.
  • Jäger-Zürn I. 1997. Embryological and floral studies in Weddellina squamulosa Tul. (Podostemaceae, Tristichoideae). Aquatic Botany 57: 151182.
  • Jeong SC, Ritchie NJ, Myrold DD. 1999. Molecular phylogenies of plants and Frankia support multiple origins of actinorhizal symbioses. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 13: 493503.
  • Judd WS. 1997. The Flacourtiaceae in the southeastern United States. Harvard Papers in Botany 1: 6579.
  • Judd WS, Campbell CS, Kellogg EA, Stevens PF. 1999. Plant systematics – a phylogenetic approach. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
  • Judd WS, Campbell CS, Kellogg EA, Stevens PF, Donoghue MJ. 2002. Plant systematics – a phylogenetic approach, 2nd edn. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer.
  • Källersjö M, Bergqvist G, Anderberg A. 2000. Generic realignment in primuloid families of the Ericales s. l. a phylogenetic analysis based on DNA sequences from three chloroplast genes and morphology. American Journal of Botany 87: 13251341.
  • Källersjö M, Farris JS, Chase MW, Bremer B, Fay MF, Humphries CJ, Petersen G, Seberg O, Bremer K. 1998. Simultaneous parsimony jacknife analysis of 2538 rbcL DNA sequences reveals support for major clades of green plants, land plants, seed plants and flowering plants. Plant Systematics and Evolution 213: 259287.
  • Kårehed J. 2001. Multiple origin of the tropical forest tree family Icacinaceae. American Journal of Botany 88: 22592274.
  • Kårehed J. 2003. The family Pennantiaceae and its relationships to Apiales. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 124.
  • Kårehed J, Lundberg J, Bremer B, Bremer K. 1999. Evolution of the Australasian families Alseuosmiaceae, Argophyllaceae, and Phellinaceae. Systematic Botany 24: 660682.
  • Kron KA, Judd WS, Stevens PF, Crayn DM, Anderberg AA, Gadek PA, Quinn CJ, Luteyn JL. 2002. Phylogenetic classification of Ericaceae: molecular and morphological evidence. Botanical Review 68: 335423.
  • Litt A, Chase MW. 1999. The systematic position of Euphronia, with comments on the position of Balanops: an analysis based on rbcL sequence data. Systematic Botany 23: 401409.
  • Lundberg J. 2001. The asteralean affinity of the Mauritian Roussea (Rousseaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 267276.
  • Lundberg J, Bremer K. 2002. A phylogenetic study of the order Asterales using one large morphological and three molecular data sets. International Journal of Plant Sciences, in press.
  • Manhart JR, Rettig JH. 1994. Gene sequence data. In: Behnke , H-D, Mabry, TJ, eds. Caryophyllales: evolution and systematics. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 235246.
  • Meimberg H, Dittrich P, Bringmann G, Schlauer J, Heubl G. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of Caryophyllidae s.l. based on matK sequences with special emphasis on carnivorous taxa. Plant Biology 2: 218228.
  • Morgan DR, Soltis DE. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships among members of the Saxifragaceae sensu lato based on rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 631660.
  • Nandi O, Chase MW, Endress PK. 1998. A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and non-molecular data sets. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 137212.
  • Neyland R. 2002. A phylogeny inferred from large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA sequences suggests that Burmanniales is polyphyletic. Australian Plant Research 15: 1928.
  • Nickrent DL. 2002. Orígenes filogenéticos de las plantas parásitas. In: López-SáezJA, CatalánP, SáezL, eds. Plantas parásitas de la Península Ibérica e Islas Baleares. Madrid, Spain: Mundi-Prensa Libros, 2956.
  • Nickrent DL, Blarer A, Qiu Y-L, Soltis DE, Zanis M. 2001. Paleoherb status of Hydnoraceae supported by multigene analyses. In: Botany 2001: plants and people, Abstracts. Columbus, Ohio: Botanical Society of America, 130131.
  • Nickrent DL, Duff RJ. 1996. Molecular studies of parasitic plants using ribosomal RNA. In: MorenoMT, CuberoJI, BernerD, JoelD, MusselmanLJ, ParkerC, eds. Advances in parasitic plant research. Cordoba, Spain: Junta de Andalucia, Direccion General de Investigacion Agraria, 2852.
  • Nickrent DL, Duff RJ, Colwell AE, Wolfe AD, Young ND, Steiner KE, DePamphilis CW. 1998. Molecular phylogenetic and evolutionary studies of parasitic plants. In: SoltisDE, SoltisPS, DoyleJJ, eds. Molecular systematics of plants II. Boston: Kluwer, 211241.
  • Nickrent DL, Malécot V. 2001. A molecular phylogeny of Santalales. In: FerA, ThalouarnP, JoelDM, MusselmanLJ, ParkerC, VerkleijJAC, eds. Proceedings of the 7th International Parasitic Weed Symposium. Nantes, France: Faculté Des Sciences, Université de Nantes, 6974.
  • Olmstead RG, DePamphilis CW, Wolfe AD, Young ND, Elisons WJ, Reeves PA. 2001. Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae. American Journal of Botany 88: 348361.
  • Olmstead RG, Ferguson D. 2001. A molecular phylogeny of the Boraginaceae-Hydrophyllaceae. In: Botany 2001: plants and people, Abstracts. Columbus, Ohio: Botanical Society of America, 131.
  • Olmstead RG, Kim K-J, Jansen RK, Wagstaff SJ. 2000. The phylogeny of the Asteridae sensu lato based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16: 96112.
  • Oxelman B, Backlund M, Bremer B. 1999. Relationships of Buddlejaceae s.l. investigated using parsimony jackknife and branch support analysis of chloroplast ndhF and rbcL sequence data. Systematic Botany 24: 164182.
  • Pires JC, Sytsma KJ. 2002. A phylogenetic evaluation of a biosystematic framework: Brodiaea and related petaloid monocots (Themidaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 13421359.
  • Plunkett GM. 2001. Relationship of the order Apiales to subclass Asteridae: a re-evaluation of morphological characters based on insights from molecular data. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 8: 183200.
  • Plunkett GM, Lowry PP. 2001. Relationships among ‘ancient araliads’ and their significance for the systematics of Apiales. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19: 259276.
  • Qiu Y-L, Chase MW, Hoot SB, Conti E, Crane PR, Sytsma KJ, Parks CR. 1998. Phylogenetics of Hamamelidae and their allies: parsimony analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 891905.
  • Qiu Y-L, Lee J, Bernasconi-Quadroni F, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Zanis M, Zimmer EA, Chen Z, Savolainen V, Chase MW. 1999. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402: 404407.
  • Renner SS. 1999. Circumscription and phylogeny of the Laurales: evidence from molecular and morphological data. American Journal of Botany 86: 13011315.
  • Reveal JL. 1998onward. Indices nominum supragenericorum plantarum vascularium. Alphabetical listing by genera of validly published suprageneric names. http:www.inform.umd.eduPBIOfaminspvindex.html.
  • Ronse Decraene LP, Smets EF. 1999. Similarities in floral ontogeny and anatomy between the genera Francoa (Francoaceae) and Greyia (Greyiaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: 377393.
  • Rudall PJ, Conran JG, Chase MW. 2000a. Systematics of Ruscaceae/Convallariaceae: a combined morphological and molecular investigation. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 134: 7392.
  • Rudall PJ, Cribb PJ, Cutler DF, Humphries CJ. 1995. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
  • Rudall PJ, Furness CA, Fay MF, Chase MW. 2000b. Consider the lilies – systematics of Liliales. In: WilsonKL, MorrisonDA, eds. Systematics and evolution of monocots. Proceedings of the 2nd International Monocot Symposium. Melbourne: CSIRO, 347359.
  • Savolainen V, Chase MW, Hoot SB, Morton CM, Soltis DE,  Bayer  C,  Fay  MF,  de Bruijn  AY,  Sullivan  S,  Qiu Y-L. 2000a. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Systematic Biology 49: 306362.
  • Savolainen V, Fay MF, Albach DC, Backlund A, Van Der Bank M, Cameron KM, Johnson SA, Lledó MD, Pintaud J-C, Powell M, Sheahan MC, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Weston P, Whitten WM, Wurdack KJ, Chase MW. 2000b. Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bulletin 55: 257309.
  • Savolainen V, Spichiger R, Manen JF. 1997. Polyphyletism of Celastrales deduced from a chloroplast non-coding DNA region. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7: 145157.
  • Sheahan MC, Chase MW. 1996. A phylogenetic analysis of Zygophyllaceae R. Br. based on morphological, anatomical and rbcL sequence data. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 122: 279300.
  • Sheahan MC, Chase MW. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within Zygophyllaceae based on DNA sequences of three plastid regions, with special emphasis on Zygophylloideae. Systematic Botany 25: 371384.
  • Shore JS, McQueen KL, Little SL. 1994. Inheritance of plastid DNA in the Turnera ulmifolia complex. American Journal of Botany 81: 16361639.
  • Simmons MP, Clevinger CC, Savolainen V, Archer RH, Mathews S, Doyle JJ. 2001. Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from phytochrome B gene sequence and morphology. American Journal of Botany 88: 313325.
  • Soltis DE, Senters AE, Kim S, Thompson JD, Soltis PS, Zanis MJ, De Craene LS, Endress PK, Farris JS, 2003. Gunnerales are sister to other core eudicots and exhibit floral features of early-diverging eudicots. American Journal of Botany 90: 461470.
  • Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Chase MW. 1999. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402: 402404.
  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Chase MW, Mort ME, Albach DC, Zanis M, Savolainen V, Hahn WH, Hoot SB, Fay MF, Axtell M, Swensen SM, Prince LM, Kress WJ, Nixon KC, Farris JA. 2000a. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381461.
  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Nickrent DL, Johnson LA, Hahn WJ, Hoot SB, Sweere JA, Kuzoff RK, Kron KA, Chase MW, Swensen SM, Zimmer EA, Chaw SM, Gillespie LJ, Kress WJ, Sytsma KJ. 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 149.
  • Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Zanis MJ, Kim S. 2000b. Basal lineages of angiosperms: Relationships and implications for floral evolution. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (6, Suppl.): S97S107.
  • Soltis, DE, Soltis, PS. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae sensu lato: a comparison of topologies based on 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 84: 504522.
  • Sosa V, Chase MW. 2003 Phylogenetics of Crossosomataceae based on rbcL DNA sequence data. Systematic Botany 27, in press.
  • Stevens, PF. 2001. Angiosperm phylogeny website. http:www.mobot.org.MOBOTresearchAPweb.
  • Sytsma KJ, Morawetz J, Pires JC, Nepokroeff M, Conti E, Zjhra M, Hall JC, Chase MW. 2002. Urticalean rosids: circumscription, rosid ancestry, and phylogenetics based on rbcL, trnLF, and ndhF sequences. American Journal of Botany 89: 15311546.
  • Takhtajan AL. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Thorne RF. 1992. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Botanical Review 58: 225348.
  • Thorne RF. 2001. The classification and geography of flowering plants: dicotyledons of the class Angiospermae (subclasses Magnoliidae, Ranunculidae, Caryophyllidae, Dilleniidae, Rosidae, Asteridae, and Lamiidae). Botanical Review 66: 441647.
  • Ueda K, Kosuge H, Tobe H. 1997. A molecular phylogeny of Celtidaceae and Ulmaceae (Urticales) based on rbcL nucleotide sequences. Journal of Plant Research 110: 171178.
  • Wiegrefe SJ, Sytsma KJ, Guries RP. 1998. The Ulmaceae, one family or two? Evidence from chloroplast DNA restriction site mapping. Plant Systematics and Evolution 210: 249270.
  • Wilson KL, Morrison DA. 2000. Systematics and evolution of monocots. Proceedings of the 2nd International Monocot Symposium. Melbourne: CSIRO.
  • Wu C-Y, Tang Y-C, Chen Z-D, Li D-Z. 2002. Synopsis of a new ‘polyphyletic-polychronic-polytopic’ system of the angiosperms. Acata Phytotaxonoica Sinica 40: 289322.
  • Wurdack KJ, Horn JW. 2001. A reevaluation of the affinities of the Tepuianthaceae: molecular and morphological evidence for placement in the Malvales. In: Botany 2001: plants and people, Abstracts. Columbus, Ohio: Botanical Society of America, 151.
  • Xiang Q-Y, Moody M, Soltis DE, Fan CZ, Soltis PS. 2002. Relationships within Cornales and circumscription of Cornaceae –matK and rbcL sequence data and effects of outgroups and long branches. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24: 3547.
  • Zanis MJ, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Qiu Y-L, Mathews S, Donoghue MJ. 2002. The root of the angiosperms revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 99: 68486853.
  • Zanis MJ, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Qiu Y-L, Zimmer EA. 2003. Phylogenetic analyses and perianth evolution in basal angiosperms. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden in press.