Responses of human elbow flexor muscles to electrically stimulated forced lengthening exercise
Article first published online: 22 FEB 2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2002.00936.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
NOSAKA, K. , NEWTON, M. and SACCO, P. (2002), Responses of human elbow flexor muscles to electrically stimulated forced lengthening exercise. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 174: 137–145. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2002.00936.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 22 FEB 2002
- Article first published online: 22 FEB 2002
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- maximal isometric force;
- muscle damage;
- muscle soreness;
- percutaneous electrical stimulation;
- plasma CK activity;
- repeated bout effect;
- ROM;
- swelling
This study developed an electrical stimulation model for human elbow flexors to examine eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage and adaptation. Male students (n=17) were randomly placed into one of two groups; isometric (ES-ISO, n=8) and eccentric (ES-ECC, n=9). The elbow joint was fixed at 90° (1.57 rad) and the elbow flexors stimulated percutaneously by an electronic muscle stimulator for 5 s through two electrodes placed over the muscles for ES-ISO. In ES-ECC, the muscles were stimulated similarly to the ES-ISO, but the elbow joint was forcibly extended from an elbow flexed (90° 1.57 rad) to a full-extended position (180°, 3.14 rad) in 3 s. Maximal voluntary isometric force, range of motion, upper arm circumference, muscle thickness by ultrasonography, muscle soreness, plasma creatine kinase and aspartate aminotransferase activities were assessed before and for 4 days after exercise. ES-ECC produced significantly larger changes in all criterion measures compared with ES-ISO (P < 0.01). These findings confirmed that eccentric muscle actions induced muscle damage, but isometric contractions resulted in little or no damage. Six subjects from the ES-ECC group repeated the same eccentric exercise (ECC2) 2 weeks after the first bout (ECC1), and changes in the criterion measures were compared between the bouts. Changes in all criterion measures after ECC2 were significantly smaller than ECC1 (P < 0.01). These results suggest that the first eccentric exercise produced a protective effect against muscle damage in the subsequent eccentric exercise bout, which does not involve adaptations in the central nervous system.

1748-1716/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=d77126e9bca501df7554d8c1578bcba3ce3110cc)
1748-1716/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=0c8adad6c391a4a6d3ae45d0363506a9fc03e60b)