Comparison between theophylline and spironolactone in the management of cirrhotic ascites: a randomized controlled study
Article first published online: 25 DEC 2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00318.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Stanley, Forrest, Dabos, Gilchrist and Hayes (1998), Comparison between theophylline and spironolactone in the management of cirrhotic ascites: a randomized controlled study. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 12: 389–393. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00318.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 25 DEC 2001
- Article first published online: 25 DEC 2001
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Background:
It has been suggested that adenosine is involved in the renal haemodynamic and tubular abnormalities observed in cirrhosis. Low-dose theophylline is an adenosine antagonist and recent studies have shown that this drug can improve renal blood flow and sodium excretion in cirrhotic patients.
Methods:
Fifteen patients with newly diagnosed cirrhotic ascites were randomized to receive either 100 mg spironolactone daily for 7 days or 250 mg theophylline on days 1, 2, 4 and 6. Baseline clinical and urinary and serum biochemical data were collected and compared following therapy.
Results:
After 7 days of spironolactone there were increases in urinary sodium excretion (43.5 ± 15.6 vs. 106.8 ± 34.7 mmol/day; P < 0.05) and urine volume (769.1 ± 206.5 vs. 1541.6 ± 342.6 mL/day; P < 0.05). No changes in the patients’ weight, creatinine clearance or serum electrolytes were observed. No change was detected in any of these parameters following theophylline therapy.
Conclusion:
Adenosine antagonism in the form of low-dose theophylline is less efficacious than spironolactone in the management of cirrhotic ascites.

1365-2036/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=45db8c78d1d41c404034f2eaf7587620d5727843)
1365-2036/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=45518840b7e2e59fcc9d74113b13f4474a604878)
1365-2036/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=d621428d7905f55dc6cbe431b6da6a6c8f16399c)