SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
  • 2
    Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Adopted. GA Res.; 217A (III): UN Document AA/810, 10th December, 1948.
  • 3
    Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocol no. 11 Rome, 4.XI 1950. Council of Europe website: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm
  • 4
    The impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on medical decision making October 2000. BMA website: http://www.bma.org.uk/public/ethics.nsf
  • 5
    A National. Health Service Trust v D & Ors. 2000 2 FLR 677.
  • 6
    per Laws J. In: R. v. Cambridge Health Authority, Ex Parte B 1995 25. BMLR 5.
  • 7
    Re F. 1989 2 WLR 1025.
  • 8
    Airedale NHS Trust v Bland. 1993 AC 789.
  • 9
    NHS Trust A v M; NHS, Trust B, v H. 2001 2 WLR 942.
  • 10
    Re G. 1995 2 FCR 46.
  • 11
    Wright T. Health. In: Baker, C, ed. Human Rights Act 1998: a Practitioner's Guide. London, Sweet and Maxwell 1998. Chapter 9, p 301.
  • 12
    The Queen on the Application of Mrs Diane Pretty (Appellant) v Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) and Secretary of. State for the Home Department (Interested Party). 2001 UKHL 61.
  • 13
    De Mello R, eds. Human Rights Act 1998. A Practical Guide. Bristol, Jordans, 2000: p 57.
  • 14
    R v North and. East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan. 1999 The Times, 20/7/1999.
  • 15
    Tanko v Finland. 1994 Application No. 23634/94 (Unreported). European Commission on Human Rights.
  • 16
    X v Denmark. 1983 Application no. 9974/82 32 DR 282.
  • 17
    De Mello R, eds. Human Rights Act 1998. A Practical Guide. Bristol, Jordans, 2000: 63.
  • 18
    Herczegfalvy v Austria. 1992 15 EHRR 437.
  • 19
    D v UK. 1997 24 EHRR 423.
  • 20
    X v FRG. 1984 7 EHRR CD 152.
  • 21
    Re C (adult; refusal of medical treatment). 1994 1 FLR 31.
  • 22
    Re MB (an adult: medical treatment). 1997 2 FLR 426 (CA).
  • 23
    Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA.1986 AC 112, [1985] 3 All ER 402, [1985] 2 BMLR 11 (HL).
  • 24
    Lewis P. Feeding anorexic patients who refuse food. Medical Law Review1999; 7: 2137.
  • 25
    Wadham J, Mountfield H, eds. Blackstone's Guide to the Human Rights Act, 2nd edn. Blackstone Press, London, 1998: 69.
  • 26
    Horton R. Health and the UK Human Rights Act. Lancet 20001998; 356: 11868.
  • 27
    Hewson B. Why the human rights act matters to doctors. British Medical Journal2000; 321: 7801.
  • 28
    Van de Mussele v Belgium. 1983 6 EHRR 163.
  • 29
    Szmukler G, Holloway F. Reform of the Mental Health Act: health or safety? British Journal of Psychiatry 2000; 177: 196200.
  • 30
    Le Compte, Van Leuven and Demeyere v Belgium. 1981 Series A. no. 43; 6 EHRR 583.
  • 31
    Brahams D. UK. impact of European human rights law. Lancet.; 356: 14334, 2000.
  • 32
    Darnell v UK. 1991 69 DR 306.
  • 33
    Tomlin PJ. Both GMC and NHS disciplinary hearings breach Human Rights Act. Hospital Doctor, 11/10/2001.
  • 34
    Diennet v France. 1995 21 EHRR 554.
  • 35
    Brahams D. GMCs sifting and investigation of complaints must be ‘transparent’. Lancet; 356: 144, 2000.
  • 36
    Gaskin v UK 1989 Series A, no. 160; 12. EHRR 36.
  • 37
  • 38
    MS v Sweden 1997 3 BHRC 248.
  • 39
    X v Commission of the European Communities. 1995 IRLR 320.
  • 40
    W v UK 1987 Series A, no. 121 10. EHRR 29.
  • 41
    Re S (a minor) (medical treatment). 1993 1 FLR 376.
  • 42
    Re J (a minor) (wardship: medical treatment). 1992 3 WLR 758.
  • 43
    Sedley S. The right to know. London Review of Books. 10/8/2000: 135.
  • 44
    R v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte Wagstaff 2 000 All ER (D) 1021.
  • 45
    General Medical Council. Good medical practice. GMC website: http://www.gmc-uk.org/standards/standards_ frameset.htm.