SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    The Audit Commission Anaesthesia under examination. The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Anaesthesia and Pain Relief Services in England and Wales. http://www.auditcommission.gov.uk/publications/anaexec.shtml.
  • 2
    Shevde K, Panagopoulos G. A survey of 800 patients' knowledge, attitudes, and concerns regarding anesthesia. Anaesthesia and Analgesia1997; 73: 1908.
  • 3
    Buck N, Devlin HB, Lunn JN, eds. The Report of the Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths (1987). London, the Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust/King's Fund 1987.
  • 4
    Phillips GD, ed. Anaesthesia Related Mortality in Australia. Report of the Working Party of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. 1991–93. http://www.anzca.edu.au/publications/reports/mortality/mortfram.htm.
  • 5
    Fox AJ, Rowbotham DJ. Clinical Review. Recent advances: Anaesthesia. British Medical Journal 1999; 319: 55760.
  • 6
    Angelos P, DaRosa DA, Bentram D, Sherman H. Residents seeking informed consent: are they adequately knowledgeable? Current Surgery 2002; 59: 1158.
  • 7
    Young R. Informed consent and patient autonomy. In: KuhseH, SingerP, eds. A Companion to Bioethics. Massuchusetts: Blackwell 1998; 441.
  • 8
    Waisel DB, Truog RD. The benefits of the explanation of the risks of anaesthesia in the day surgery patient. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology 1995; 7: 2004.
  • 9
    Gillick V West Norfolk and Wisbech. Area Health Authority [1986] AC 112 (HL).
  • 10
    ReC (adult: refusal of medical treatment) 1994 1 All ER 819 (Fam Division).
  • 11
    Hawkins JL, Gibbs CP, Orleans M, Martin-Salvag G, Beaty B. Obstetric work force survey. 1981 Versus 1992 Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 13543.
  • 12
    Re, MB. (an adult: medical treatment) 2 FLR 426 (CA).
  • 13
    Kopp VJ. Communication with patients before anaesthesia and obtention of preanaesthetic consent. Current Opinions in Anaesthesiology 2002; 15: 2515.
  • 14
    Veatch RM. Abandoning informed consent. Hastings Centre Reports 1995; 25 ( 2 ): 512.
  • 15
    Jones MA. Informed consent and other fairy stories. Medical Law Review 1999; 7: 10334.
  • 16
    O'Neill O. Paternalism and partial autonomy. Journal of Medical Ethics 1984; 10: 1738.
  • 17
    Lavelle-Jones C, Byrne DJ, Rice P et al. Factors affecting quality of informed consent. British Medical Journal 1993; 306: 88590.
  • 18
    Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain andIreland. Information and Consent for Anaesthesia.http://www.aagbi.org/pdf/consent1.pdf.
  • 19
    Sidaway v Board of Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital and the Maudsley Hospital 1985 1 AC, 1999: 871.
  • 20
    Aitkenhead AR. Anaesthetists need consent, but not written consent. British Medical Journal 1999; 319: 1135.
  • 21
    British Medical Association. Report of the Consent Working Party, March 2001. http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/reportoftheconsentworkingparty.
  • 22
    Taylor V. Shropshire Health Authority [1998] Lloyd's Rep Medical 395 (QBD).
  • 23
    Gilberthorpe J. Consent to treatment. London, the Medical Defence Union, 1998, 1997.
  • 24
    Department of Health. A Guide to Consent for Examination and Treatment. London: Department of Health 1990.
  • 25
    Poswillo D. General Anaesthesia, Sedation and Resuscitation in Dentistry. Report of an Expert Working Party for the Standing Dental Advisory Committee. London, Department of Health 1990.
  • 26
    Department of Health. Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment. http://www.doh.gov.uk/consent/refguide.htm.
  • 27
    General Medical Council 2001 Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. http://www.gmc-uk.org/standards/consent.htm.
  • 28
    Australia and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. 1998 The Pre-anaesthesia consultation. Professional Standard PS7. http://www.anzca.edu.au/publications/profdocs/profstandards/ps7.htm.
  • 29
    American Medical Association Informed Consent (1998) http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/4608.html .
  • 30
    Health Care Consent Act (Ontario) (1996) SO1996, c2,Schedule A.
  • 31
    Whitefield TD. Consent to anaesthesia. Health Care Risk Report 1998; 4: 189.
  • 32
    Barnesci MG, Novelli GP, Miccinesi G, Paci E. Informed consent to anaesthesia. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 1998; 15: 5179.
  • 33
    Jones MA. Commentary: The legal position. British Medical Journal., 1995; 310: 467.
  • 34
    Mello MM. On swords and shields: the role of clinical practice guidelines in medical malpractice litigation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review., 2001; 149: 645710.
  • 35
    St Georges NHS Trust v S[1998] 3 All ER 673 (CA).
  • 36
    ReT (adult: refusal of medical treatment) 1992 9 BMLR 46 (CA).
  • 37
    Airedale NHS Trust v Bland 1993 1 All ER 821 (HL).
  • 38
    O'Brien v Cunard SS Co 1891 28 NE 266 (Mass Sup Jud Ct).
  • 39
    Chatterton v Gerson 1981 1 All ER, 1998: 257.
  • 40
    ReW. (a minor) (medical treatment)[1993] Fam 64 (CA).
  • 41
    Aitkenhead AR. The pattern of litigation against anaesthetists. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1994, 1993; 73: 1021.
  • 42
    Leigh JM, Walker J, Janaganathan P. Effect of preoperative anaesthetic visit on anxiety. British Medical Journal 1977; 2: 9879.
  • 43
    ReF. (mental patient: sterilisation)[1990] 2 AC 1 (HL).
  • 44
    Inglis S, Farnill D. The effects of providing preoperative statistical anaesthetic-risk information. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1993; 21: 799805.
  • 45
    Moerman N, Van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Oosting H. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1996; 82: 44551.
  • 46
    Chapman MV, Wolff AH. Consent for anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 710.
  • 47
    Farnill D, Inglis S. Patients' desire for information about anaesthesia: Australian attitudes. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 1624.
  • 48
    Lonsdale M, Hutchison GL. Patients' desire for information about anaesthesia. Scottish and Canadian attitudes. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 4102.
  • 49
    Garden AL, Merry AF, Holland RL, Petrie KJ. Anaesthesia information – what patients want to know. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1994; 24: 5948.
  • 50
    Paci E, Barnesci MG, Miccinesi G et al. Informed consent and patient participation in the medical encounter: a list of questions for an informed choice about the type of anaesthesia. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 1999; 16: 1605.
  • 51
    Kain ZN, Wang SM, Caramico LA, Hofstadter M, Mayes LC. Parental desire for perioperative information and informed consent: a two-phase study. Anaesthesia and Analgesia 1997; 84: 299306.
  • 52
    Shevde K, Panagopoulos G. A survey of 800 patients' knowledge, attitudes, and concerns regarding anaesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1994; 73: 1908.
  • 53
    Dawes PJ, Davison P. Informed consent: what do patients want to know? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 1994; 87: 14952.
  • 54
    Osuna E, Perez-Carceles MD, Perez-Moreno JA, Luna A. Informed consent. Evaluation of the information provided to patients before anaesthesia and surgery. Medicine and Law 1998; 17: 5118.
  • 55
    Bellew M, Atkinson KR, Dixon G, Yates A. The introduction of a paediatric anaesthesia information leaflet. an audit of its impact on parental anxiety and satisfaction. Paediatric Anaesthesia 2002; 12: 12430.
  • 56
    Bolam v Friern Barnet Hospital Management Committee[1957] 1 WLR: 582.
  • 57
    Pearce v United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust (1998) 48 BMLR 118 (CA).
  • 58
    Bolitho V City and Hackney Health Authority 1998, 39 BMLR, 1.
  • 59
    Kennedy I, Grubb A, eds. Medical Law, 2nd edn. London: Butterworths, 2000: 710.
  • 60
    Adams AM, Smith AF. Risk perception and communication: recent developments and implications for anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 74555.
  • 61
    Calman KC. Communication of risk: choice, consent and trust. Lancet 2002; 360: 1668.
  • 62
    Heneghan C. Consent to medical treatment: what should the patient be told? British Journal of Anaesthesia 1994; 73: 258.
  • 63
    Hansson MO. Balancing the quality of consent. Journal of Medical Ethics 1998; 24: 1827.
  • 64
    Faya and Rossi v Almaraz (1993) 620 A. 2d: 327(Maryland CA).
  • 65
    KAC. v Benson (1995) 527 NW2d 553 (Minn).
  • 66
    Kennedy I, Grubb A, eds. Medical Law, 2nd edn. London: Butterworths, 1995, 2000: 712.
  • 67
    Behringer Estate v Princeton Medical Centre(1992) 592 A. 2d: 1251 (New Jersey Supreme Court).
  • 68
    Barrigar DL, Flagel DC, Upshur REG. Hepatitis B virus infected physicians and disclosure of transmission risks to patients: a critical analysis. Biomed Central Medical Ethics 2001; 2: 4.
  • 69
    Hidding v Williams 1991 578 So 2d, 1192 (Louisiana CA).
  • 70
    Slovenko R. Informed consent: information about the physician. Medicine and Law 1994; 13: 46772.
  • 71
    R v Richardson (1998) 43 BMLR 21 (CA).
  • 72
    Wilsher v Essex AHA 1997 QB 730 (CA).
  • 73
    Department of Health. Medical Students in Hospitals: a Guide on Their Access to Patients and Clinical Work. London: Department of Health (1997).
  • 74
    Haughian v Paine 1987 37 DLR (4th) 624 (Sask CA).
  • 75
    Truman V Thomas 1980, 611: 2d, 902 (Cal & Supreme Ct).
  • 76
    Kellerman AL, Ackerman TF. Interhospital patient transfer. The case for informed consent. New England Journal of Medicine 1988; 319: 6436.
  • 77
    Houghton DJ, Williams S, Bennett JD, Back G, Jones AS. Informed consent: patients' and junior doctors' perceptions of the consent procedure. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences 1997; 22: 5158.
  • 78
    Soin B, Smellie WA, Thomson HJ. Informed consent: a case for more education of the surgical team. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 1993; 75: 625.
  • 79
    Mulcahy D, Cunningham K, McCormack D, Cassidy N, Walsh M. Informed consent from whom? Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 1997; 42: 1614.
  • 80
    Watkins EJ, Milligan LJ, O'Beirne HA. Information and consent for anaesthesia: a postal survey of current practice in Great Britain. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 87982.
  • 81
    Body DI. Civil and criminal actions against anaesthetists. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1994; 73: 8392.
  • 82
    R. v Arthur. Times, 5th November, 1981.
  • 83
    Williams Curnow A. Death under anaesthetic. the case of Dr Adomako. Medicine Science and the Law 1996; 36: 18893.
  • 84
    Ferner RE. Medication errors that have led to manslaughter charges. British Medical Journal 2000; 321: 12126.
  • 85
    Hills v Potter[1983] 3 All ER, 716.
  • 86
    White SM, Baldwin TJ. The Human Rights Act. : implications for anaesthesia and intensive care. Anaesthesia 2002, 1998; 57: 8828.
  • 87
    Freeman v Home Office[1984] QB 524 (CA).
  • 88
    Allan V Mount Sinai Hospital (1980) 109 DLR (3d): 634.
  • 89
    Devi v West Midlands RHA: CA, unreported.
  • 90
    Davis V Barking, Havering and Brentwood Health Authority , 1993 4 Medical Law Rev, 85.
  • 91
    Mason JK, McCall Smith RA. GMC may not be entitled to conclude that assault occurred. British Medical Journal 1995; 310: 936.
  • 92
    Caplan RA. Informed consent: patterns of liability from the ASA Closed Claims project. American Society of Anesthesiologists Newsletter 2000; 64: 59.
  • 93
    Jacobs v Great Yarmouth[1995] 3 Medical Law Rev 192 (CA).
  • 94
    Waisel DB, Truog RD. Informed consent. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 96878.
  • 95
    Chester v Afshar[2002] EWCA Civ 724 (CA).
  • 96
    ReW (a minor) (medical treatment) 1993 Fam 64 (CA).
  • 97
    ReL (medical treatment: Gillick competency) 1998 2 FLR, 810.
  • 98
    ReM (medical treatment: consent)[1998] 2 FLR, 1097.
  • 99
    ReP (minors) (wardship: cure and control)[1992] 2 FCR, 681.
  • 100
    ReG (a minor) (parental responsibility: education)[1994] 2 FLR, 964.
  • 101
    Re J (child's religious upbringing and circumcision) (1999) 52 BMLR 82 (CA).
  • 102
    Stokes MA, Drake-Lee AB. Children who withdraw consent for elective surgery. Paediatric Anesthesia 1998, 8: 1135.
  • 103
    Herczegfalvy v Austria[1992] 15 EHRR 437.
  • 104
    Roberts J. Consent issues in obstetric anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2002; 57: 12323.
  • 105
    Norfolk, Norwich Healthcare (NHS) Trust v W. [1997] 1 FCR 269 (Fam Division).
  • 106
    Rochdale Healthcare (NHS) Trust v C 1997 1 FCR 274 (Fam Division).
  • 107
    Tameside and Glossop Acute Services Trust v CH 1996 1 FLR, 762.
  • 108
    ReAK (Adult patient) (Medical treatment: consent)[2001] 1 FLR, 129.
  • 109
    Breen TW, McNeil T, Dierenfield L. Obstetric anaesthesia practice in Canada. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2000; 47: 123042.
  • 110
    Smedstad KG, Beilby W. Informed consent for epidural analgesia in labor. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2000; 47: 10559.
  • 111
    Jackson A, Henry R, Avery N, VanDenKerkhof E, Milne B. Informed consent for labour epidurals: what labouring women want to know. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2000; 47: 106873.
  • 112
    Pattee C, Ballantyne M, Milne B. Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: informed consent issues. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 1997; 44: 91823.
  • 113
    Swan HB, Borshoff DC. Informed consent – recall of risk information following epidural analgesia in labour. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 1994; 22: 13941.
  • 114
    Dyer AR, Bloch S. Informed consent and the psychiatric patient. Journal of Medical Ethics 1987; 13: 126.
  • 115
    T v T[1988] Fam 52.
  • 116
    Department of Health. Reforming the Mental Health Act. http://www.doh.gov.uk/mentalhealth/whitepaper.htm.
  • 117
    Faunce TA. Medical disclosure and consent forms: proposal for an international standard. Medicine and Law 1997; 16: 58191.
  • 118
    US President's Commission. The communication process. In: President's Commission: Making Health Care Decisions, Vol. 1Chapter 4. US. Government Printing Office. 1983: 109.
  • 119
    The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Consent to Medical Treatment. Policy #1–01. http://www.cpso.on.ca/Policies/consent.htm.
  • 120
    Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society. Guidelines to the Practice of Anaesthesia. The Preanaesthetic Period. http://www.cas.ca/guidelines/pre_an.asp .
  • 121
    Law Reform Commission of Victoria. Report 24. Informed Decisions About Medical Procedures. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/alrc/publications/reports/50/chap1.pdf.
  • 122
    Skene L, Smallwood R. Informed consent: lessons from Australia. British Medical Journal 2002; 324: 3941.
  • 123
    Gieson D. The patient's right to know – a comparative law perspective. Medicine and Law 1993; 12: 55365.
  • 124
    Skegg PDG. English medical law and ‘informed consent’. an antipodean assessment and alternative. Medical Law Review 1999; 7: 13565.
  • 125
    Reibl v Hughes (1980) 114 DLR (3d): 1 (Supreme Court of Canada).
  • 126
    Rogers v Whittaker(1992) 67 ALJR 47 (High Court of Australia).
  • 127
    New Zealand Code of Health and Disability Consumer's Rights 1996. http://www.hdc.org.nz/aboutus/the_code-2.html .
  • 128
    DeCruz P. Consent to medical treatment: evolution and development of the law in non-UK jurisdictions. In: Comparative Healthcare Law. London: Cavendish Publishing Ltd, 1992, 2001: 32358.
  • 129
    Smith v Tunbridge Wells HA[1994] 5 Medical Law Rev, 334.
  • 130
    Newell and Newell v Goldenberg[1995] 6 Medical Law Rev, 371.
  • 131
    Lybert v Warrington HA (1996) 7 Medical Law Rev 71 (CA).
  • 132
    Canterbury v Spence 1972 464 F 2d: 772 (DC).
  • 133
    LeBlang TR. Informed consent and disclosure in the physician-patient relationship: expanding obligations for physicians in the United States. Medicine and Law 1995; 14: 42944.
  • 134
    Moore V Regents of University of California (1990) 793 P2d 470 (California).
  • 135
    Moore V Baker (1993) 989 F2d 1129 (11t:h Circuit).
  • 136
    Truman v Thomas (1980) 611 2d 902 (Cal Supreme Ct).