Instar-specific sensitivity of specialist Manduca sexta larvae to induced defences in their host plant Nicotiana attenuata
Article first published online: 20 DEC 2001
Volume 26, Issue 6, pages 578–586, December 2001
How to Cite
Van Dam, N. M., Hermenau, U. and Baldwin, I. T. (2001), Instar-specific sensitivity of specialist Manduca sexta larvae to induced defences in their host plant Nicotiana attenuata. Ecological Entomology, 26: 578–586. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2001.00366.x
- Issue published online: 20 DEC 2001
- Article first published online: 20 DEC 2001
- Compensatory feeding;
- effects of starvation;
- induced defence;
- intraspecific competition;
- larval development;
- lepidopteran herbivores;
- optimal defence theory;
- protease inhibitors;
- time delay
1. The time delay associated with the activation of induced defences is thought to be a liability for this type of defence because it allows herbivores to remove biomass before the defence is fully induced. When defences are costly and plants grow with competitors, however, it may be more advantageous not to induce defences too fast and motivate the herbivore to move to the neighbour when it is most voracious.
2. Such a strategy can only work when the costs for the herbivore of moving to a neighbouring plant are smaller than the costs of staying on a fully induced plant. For lepidopteran herbivores, both the sensitivity to induced defences and the costs of moving may vary considerably between instars and this variation may constrain the plant's defensive opportunities.
3. This study was designed to examine whether the cost of moving, mimicked by a starvation period of 8 h, was larger than the cost of staying on a fully induced plant for each larval instar of the specialist Manduca sexta feeding on induced and control tissues of Nicotiana attenuata.
4. For first- and second-instar larvae, the costs of moving were larger than the costs of staying on a fully induced plant. In contrast, feeding on induced plant material retarded development in third-instar larvae more than did starvation, indicating that in this instar the costs of leaving are smaller than the costs of staying on an induced plant. More than 98% of the lifetime leaf mass consumed by a M. sexta larva is consumed during the fourth and fifth instars, and during these instars larval development was not affected by either induced defences or starvation. Thus the third instar, the stage just before larvae cause the majority of damage, represents a window of sensitivity to induced defences during which larvae can be motivated to change plants.
5. These results suggest that N. attenuata plants, which commonly compete with conspecifics in nature, have the opportunity to manipulate the behaviour of the specialist herbivore M. sexta to minimise the fitness effects of inducing defences when these defences are most costly, i.e. when plants grow under intraspecific competition.