The carbon balance of a young Beech forest
Article first published online: 25 DEC 2001
Volume 14, Issue 3, pages 312–325, June 2000
How to Cite
Granier, A., Ceschia, E., Damesin, C., Dufrêne, E., Epron, D., Gross, P., Lebaube, S., Le Dantec, V., Le Goff, N., Lemoine, D., Lucot, E., Ottorini, J. M., Pontailler, J. Y. and Saugier, B. (2000), The carbon balance of a young Beech forest. Functional Ecology, 14: 312–325. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00434.x
- Issue published online: 25 DEC 2001
- Article first published online: 25 DEC 2001
- Received 22 March 1999; revised 15 October 1999;accepted 1 November 1999
- eddy covariance;
- Fagus sylvatica;
- forest ecosystem;
1. We present measurements of CO2 fluxes over 2 years above and within a young Beech stand in the east of France. This site is part of the Euroflux network set up to monitor fluxes over representative European forests.
2. The net ecosystem carbon (C) exchange was derived from continuous eddy flux measurements. Major components of the total flux (i.e. soil and above-ground biomass respiration and assimilation of leafy branches) were measured independently using chambers. The main C stocks (i.e. root, stem and branch biomass) were also quantified.
3. Daily minima of CO2 flux were typically around −20 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 during the period of full leaf expansion, while night-time ecosystem respiration varied between 5 and 15 µmol CO2 m−2 s−1. The seasonal pattern of net ecosystem assimilation was very close to that of net assimilation at the single branch scale. The seasonal variation of net ecosystem exchange was closely related to leaf expansion and soil water content during the dry year of 1996.
4. Measurements of ecosystem respiration (eddy flux) were corrected for CO2 storage within the stand. This C flux showed a seasonal pattern, the maximum rates (4–7 g C m−2 day−1) occurring in spring and summer, and appeared to be correlated with soil temperature. Temporal variation of soil respiration showed the same pattern, and effects of both temperature and soil drying were found. Annual soil respiration was ≈ 70% of ecosystem respiration. Root respiration was 60% of the total below-ground respiration.
5. Annual net C exchange was −218 and −257 g C m−2 in 1996 and 1997, respectively, corresponding to net C uptake by the forest. These values are much lower than the annual biomass increment (stems and large roots) of the stand: 427 and 471 g C m−2 year−1, respectively. The difference may be explained by a release of CO2 from the decomposition of woody debris.
6. Ecosystem C loss by respiration was 800–1000 g C m−2 year−1. Gross C gain was 1000–1300 g C m−2 year−1. Ecosystem respiration therefore played a major role in the annual C balance of this forest.