Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: m.turnbull@botn.canterbury.ac.nz
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
Moa ghosts exorcised? New Zealand’s divaricate shrubs avoid photoinhibition
Article first published online: 19 APR 2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00613.x
Additional Information
How to Cite
Howell, C. J., Kelly, D. and Turnbull, M. H. (2002), Moa ghosts exorcised? New Zealand’s divaricate shrubs avoid photoinhibition. Functional Ecology, 16: 232–240. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00613.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 APR 2002
- Article first published online: 19 APR 2002
- Received 20 April 2001; revised 14 September 2001; accepted 22 September 2001
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Browsing defence;
- canopy structure;
- carbon fixation;
- chlorophyll fluorescence;
- photosynthesis
Summary
- 1An intriguing feature of the New Zealand flora is the high frequency of ‘divaricate’ shrubs and tree juveniles. These plants have numerous interlacing wide-angled branches with small leaves and no or few leaves in the outer canopy. They comprise 10% of native woody species, and have evolved in 18 different plant families.
- 2We tested the hypothesis that the leaves of divaricate plants are sensitive to cold-induced photoinhibition, and that self-shading by outer branches reduces light intensities enough to prevent photodamage. In a field experiment, leaves of three divaricate species (Aristotelia fruticosa A. Cunn., Corokia cotoneaster Raoul and Coprosma propinqua Hook. f.) inside the north (sunny) side of the shrubs were exposed to one of three experimental treatments over winter: (i) control leaves which were not manipulated; (ii) exposed leaves which had their outer screen of branches pruned away leaving them open to full sun; or (iii) shaded leaves which were exposed by pruning, then sheltered from direct sunlight with shade cloth.
- 3Experimental removal of the shielding branches in winter led to rapid (< 20 days), large (23–31%) and persistent (> 3 months) reductions in the maximum photosynthetic capacity (Amax) and photochemical efficiency (dark adapted Fv/Fm) in exposed leaves, but not in shaded leaves. Full recovery of photosynthetic capacity and photochemical efficiency was displayed by Coprosma propinqua, but very little capacity for recovery was displayed by Aristotelia fruticosa or Corokia cotoneaster.
- 4When the effects of self-shading and photoinhibition were combined, control leaves photosynthesized faster than exposed leaves at all ambient irradiances in A. fruticosa, and in bright light (> 500 µmol m−2 s−1) in C. cotoneaster.
- 5Our data show that by shielding their leaves within an outer screen of branches, the three divaricate species studied reduce photoinhibition of photosynthesis. We contend that this architectural self-shading in divaricate plants maximizes potential carbon fixation by minimizing photoinhibition.

1365-2435/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=c8b848a8f001fdfa90240fe2ab26b1f04b6fe8e4)
1365-2435/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=2cf6e00d281371851f86902da3937ac5884bcfe0)
1365-2435/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=571713c051a4c9b4843f1aa4a484de7ca8661854)