SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ågren, J., Danell, K., Elmqvist, T., Ericson, L. & Hjältén, J. (1999) Sexual dimorphism and biotic interactions. Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants (eds M.A.Geber, T.E.Dawson & L.F.Delph), pp. 217246. Springer, Berlin.
  • Åhman, I. (1997) Growth, herbivory and disease in relation to gender in Salix viminalis L. Oecologia 111, 6168.
  • Alliende, M.C. (1989) Demographic studies of a dioecious tree. II. The distribution of leaf predation within and between trees. Journal of Ecology 77, 10481058.
  • Boecklen, W.J., Price, P.W. & Mopper, S. (1990) Sex and drugs and herbivores: sex-biased herbivory in Arroyo Willow (Salix lasiolepis). Ecology 71, 581588.
  • Boecklen, W.J., Mopper, S. & Price, P.W. (1994) Sex-biased herbivory in arroyo willow: are there general patterns among herbivores? Oikos 71, 267272.
  • Bryant, J.P. & Reichardt, P.B. (1992) Controls over secondary metabolite production by arctic woody plants. Arctic Ecosystems in a Changing Climate – An Ecophysiological Perspective (eds F.S.Chapin, R.L.Jefferies, J.F.Reynolds, G.R.Shaver & J.Svoboda), pp. 379390. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Cohen, J. (1969) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press, New York.
  • Coley, P.D. (1987) Interspecific variation in plant anti-herbivore properties: the role of habitat quality and rate of disturbance. New Phytologist 106 (Suppl.), 251263.
  • Coley, P.D., Bryant, J.P. & Chapin, F.S. (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230, 895899.
  • Cox, P.A. (1981) Niche partitioning between sexes of dioecious plants. American Naturalist 117, 295307.
  • Crawford, R.M.M. & Balfour, J. (1983) Female predominant sex ratios and physiological differentiation in arctic willows. Journal of Ecology 71, 149160.
  • Crawford, R.M.M. & Balfour, J. (1990) Female-biased sex ratios and differential growth in Arctic willows. Flora 184, 291302.
  • Danell, K., Elmqvist, T., Ericson, L. & Salomonson, A. (1985) Sexuality in willows and preference by bark-eating voles: defence or not? Oikos 44, 8290.
  • Danell, K., Hjältén, J., Ericson, L. & Elmqvist, T. (1991) Vole feeding on male and female willow shoots along a gradient of plant productivity. Oikos 62, 145152.
  • Dawson, T.E. & Bliss, L.C. (1989) Patterns of water use and the tissue water relations in the dioecious shrub, Salix arctica: the physiological basis for habitat partitioning between the sexes. Oecologia 79, 332343.
  • Dawson, T.E. & Geber, M.A. (1999) Sexual dimorphism in physiology and morphology. Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants (eds M.A.Geber, T.E.Dawson & L.F.Delph), pp. 175215. Springer, Berlin.
  • De Jong, T.J. (1995) Why fast-growing plants do not bother about defense. Oikos 74, 545548.
  • Dupont, Y.L. & Kato, M. (1999) Sex ratio variation in dioecious plant species: a comparative ecological study of six species of Lindera (Lauraceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 19, 529540.
  • Elmqvist, T., Ericson, L., Danell, K. & Salomonson, A. (1988) Latitudinal sex ratio variation in willows, Salix spp. and gradients in vole herbivory. Oikos 51, 259266.
  • Elmqvist, T., Cates, R.G., Harper, J.K. & Gardfjell, H. (1991) Flowering in males and females of a Utah willow, Salix rigida, and effects on growth, tannins, phenolic glycosides and sugars. Oikos 61, 6572.
  • Freeman, D.C., Klikoff, L.G. & Harper, K.T. (1976) Differential resourse utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193, 597599.
  • Hagerman, A.E. (1998) Tannin Analysis. http://www.muohio.edu/hagermae/handbook/.
  • Hagerman, A.E. & Butler, L.G. (1989) Choosing and using appropriate standards for tannins. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15, 17951802.
  • Harborne, J.B. (1991) The chemical basis of plant defense. Plant Defenses Against Mammalian Herbivory (eds R.T.Palo & C.T.Robbins), pp. 4559. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
  • Hartley, S.E. & Jones, C.G. (1997) Plant chemistry and herbivory, or why the world is green. Plant Ecology (ed. M.J.Crawley), pp. 284324. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Hjältén, J. (1992) Plant sex and hare feeding preferences. Oecologia 89, 253256.
  • Hjältén, J. & Palo, R.T. (1992) Selection of deciduous trees by free ranging voles and hares in relation to plant chemistry. Oikos 63, 477484.
  • Houlé, G. (1999) Nutrient availability and plant gender influences on the short-term compensatory response of Salix planifolia ssp. planifolia to simulated leaf herbivory. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29, 18411846.
  • Irvine, R.J., Stien, A., Halvorsen, O., Langvatn, R. & Albon, S.D. (1999) Life-history strategies and populations dynamics of abomasal nematodes in Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus). Parasitology 120, 297311.
  • Jing, S.W. & Coley, P.D. (1990) Dioecy and herbivory: the effect of growth rate on plant defense in Acer negundo. Oikos 58, 369377.
  • Jones, C.G. & Hartley, S.E. (1999) A protein competition model of phenolic allocation. Oikos 86, 2744.
  • Jones, M.H., Macdonald, S.E. & Henry, G.H.R. (1999) Sex- and habitat-specific responses of a high arctic willow, Salix arctica, to experimental climate change. Oikos 87, 129138.
  • Lloyd, D.G. & Webb, C.J. (1977) Secondary sex characters in plants. Botanical Review 43, 177216.
  • Nichols-Orians, C.M., Fritz, R.S. & Clausen, T.P. (1993) The genetic basis for variation in the concentration of phenolic glycosides in Salix sericea: clonal variation and sex-based differences. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 21, 535542.
  • Opler, P.A. & Bawa, K.S. (1978) Sex ratios in tropical forest trees. Evolution 32, 812821.
  • Palo, R.T. (1984) Distribution of birch (Betula spp.), willow (Salix spp.), and poplar (Populus spp.) secondary metabolites and their potential role as chemical defense against herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology 10, 499520.
  • Price, P.W., Waring, G.L., Julkunen-Tiitto, R., Tahvanainen, J., Mooney, H.A. & Craig, T.P. (1989) Carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis in within-species phytochemical variation of Salix lasiolepis. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15, 11171131.
  • Raven, J.A. (1992) The physiology of Salix. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section B 98, 4962.
  • Retuerto, R., Lema, B.F., Roiloa, S.R. & Obeso, J.R. (2000) Gender, light and water effects in carbon isotope descrimination, and growth rates in the dioecious tree Ilex aquifolium. Functional Ecology 14, 529537.
  • Sakai, A.K. & Burris, T.A. (1985) Growth in male and female aspen clones: a twenty-five-year longitudinal study. Ecology 66, 19211927.
  • SAS Institute Inc. (1989) SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.
  • Silvertown, J.W. & Lovett Doust, J. (1994) Introduction to Plant Population Biology. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York.
  • Van der Wal, R., Irvine, J., Stien, A., Shepherd, N. & Albon, S.D. (2000) Faecal avoidance and the risk of infection by nematodes in a natural population of reindeer. Oecologia 124, 1925.
  • Van der Wal, R., Brooker, R.W., Cooper, E.J. & Langvatn, R. (2001) Differential effects of reindeer on high Arctic lichens. Journal of Vegetation Science 12, 705710.
  • Väre, H., Ohtonen, R. & Mikkola, K. (1996) The effects of heavy grazing by reindeer in oligotrophic pine heaths in northeastern Fennoscandia. Ecography 19, 245253.
  • Williams, S.L. (1995) Surfgrass (Phyllospadix torreyi) reproduction: reproductive phenology, resource allocation, and male rarity. Ecology 76, 19531970.
  • Zar, J.H. (1996) Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Zucker, W.V. (1983) Tannins: does structure determine function? An ecological perspective. American Naturalist 121, 335365.