Get access
Advertisement

Carbon-based secondary and structural compounds in Mediterranean shrubs growing near a natural CO2 spring

Authors

  • J. Peñuelas,

    Corresponding author
    1. Unitat d'Ecofisiologia CSIC-CREAF, Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals (CREAF), Facultat de Ciències, Universitat Autònoma, Bellaterra 08193 (Barcelona), Spain,
      Prof. Josep Peñuelas, fax +34/93-5811312, e-mail Josep.Penuelas@uab.es
    Search for more papers by this author
  • E. Castells,

    1. Unitat d'Ecofisiologia CSIC-CREAF, Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals (CREAF), Facultat de Ciències, Universitat Autònoma, Bellaterra 08193 (Barcelona), Spain,
    Search for more papers by this author
  • R. Joffre,

    1. DREAM Unit, Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive-CNRS, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France,
    Search for more papers by this author
  • R. Tognetti

    1. Dipartimento di Scienze Animali Vegetali e dell'Ambiente (SAVA), Universitá degli Studi del Molise, via De Sanctis I-86100 Campobasso, Italy
    Search for more papers by this author

Prof. Josep Peñuelas, fax +34/93-5811312, e-mail Josep.Penuelas@uab.es

Abstract

We studied carbon-based secondary and structural compounds (CBSSCs) in Myrtus communis, Erica arborea, and Juniperus communis co-occurring in a natural CO2 spring site and in a nearby control site in a Mediterranean environment. Leaf concentrations of phenolics and CBSSCs, such as lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose, total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNCs), and lipids were measured monthly (phenolics) and every two months (the other compounds) throughout a year. There was a slight seasonal trend towards maximum concentrations of most of these CBSSCs during autumn–winter and minimum values during the spring season, particularly in Myrtus communis. For most of the CBSSCs and species, there were no consistent or significant patterns in response to the elevated [CO2] (c. 700 μmol mol−1) of the spring site. These results were not due to a dilution effect by increased structural or nonstructural carbon. Therefore, in contrast to many experimental studies of CO2 enrichment, mainly conducted for short periods, there were no greater concentrations of phenolics, and, as in many of these studies, there were neither greater concentrations of the other CBSSCs. These results do not agree with the predictions of the carbon source-sink hypotheses. Possible causes of this disagreement are discussed. These causes include the complex heterogeneous environmental conditions and the variability of resource availabilities in the field, photosynthetic down-regulation, and/or the homeostatic and evolutionary nature of organisms. These results suggest evolutionary adaptive responses to changes in CO2. They also suggest caution in attributing increased CBSSC concentrations to elevated [CO2] at long-term scale in natural conditions, and therefore in their implications for plant–herbivore interactions and for decomposition.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary