The effect of different additives on the fermentation quality, aerobic stability and in vitro digestibility of pea/wheat bi-crop silages containing contrasting pea to wheat ratios

Studies were conducted to compare the effects of using two microbial inoculants, a sulphite salt-based additive, formic acid and quebracho tannins, on the fermentation quality, nutritive value and aerobic stability of pea/wheat bi-crop silages. Spring peas (Pisum sativum var. Magnus) and spring wheat (Triticum aestivum var. Axona) were drilled together at rates that gave high (HP/W; 3:1) or low (LP/W; 1:3) pea to wheat ratios. The peas and wheat were harvested at the yellow wrinkled pods and late milk/early dough maturity stage, respectively, and conserved in 1·5-kg polyethylene bag, laboratory silos. The bi-crops were conserved without treatment (control) or treated with either of two lactic acid bacteria-based inoculants [Lactobacillus buchneri; applied at 10⁵ colony-forming units (CFU) g^–1 fresh weight (FW) or Lactobacillus plantarum (applied at 10⁶ CFU g^–1 FW)], sulphite salts (applied at the rate of 1 ml sulphite solution kg^–1 FW), quebracho tannins (applied at 16 g kg^–1 FW) and formic acid (applied at 2·5 g kg^–1 FW). Six replicates were made for each treatment, and the silos were opened after 112 days of ensilage. The level of peas in the bi-crop influenced the effectiveness of the additives. With the exception of sulphite salts, all the additives significantly reduced the soluble nitrogen (N) and ammonia-N concentrations of all the silages. The ratio of lactic acid to acetic acid was generally lower in the LP/W silages than in the HP/W silages, and the additive treatments only increased the in vitro digestible organic matter in dry matter of the LP/W silages. Of all the additives evaluated, formic acid resulted in the least aerobic spoilage in HP/W bi-crop silages. However, in the LP/W bi-crops, additive treatment was not necessary for ensuring aerobic stability.