Evaluating clinical educators: an employer's perspective

Authors

  • Sally J Wellard RN BA(SocSc) Renal Cert MN,

    Corresponding author
    1. Lecturer Deakin University School of Nursing, Melbourne, Australia
      Sally J Wellard, Lecturer School of Nursing, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway Burwood 3125 Victoria Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Colleen Rolls RN RM Child Hlth Cert BAppSc(AdvNurs) Grad Dip Child Development MEdSt,

    1. Lecturer Deakin University School of Nursing, Melbourne, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Ferguson de Sales RN BA BEd MN

    1. Principal lecturer, Deakin University School of Nursing, Melbourne, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

Sally J Wellard, Lecturer School of Nursing, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway Burwood 3125 Victoria Australia

Abstract

An Australian school of nursing's attempt to introduce an evaluation process required by management for clinical educators involved in undergraduate preregistration education is discussed Reliance on student feedback and clinical agencies' perceptions of the quality of teaching were seen as inadequate mechanisms for evaluation The evaluation process adopted incorporated observation of the educators together with self-reflection on their performance We conclude that post-briefings were poorly used and generally not reflective Educators relied heavily on their clinical skills and used a limited range of teaching strategies Whilst evaluation of clinical educators was time consuming and therefore costly, it is argued that it is essential to the integrity of the course The evaluation process has provided direction for support and development of clinical educators within the context of the curriculum

Ancillary