Exploring variables underlying non-response in a survey of nurses and nurses' aides in practice

Authors

  • K. Louise Barriball BA RGN,

    1. Lecturer, Research in Nursing Studies Section, Florence Nightingale Division of Nursing and Midwifery, Kings College London, UK,
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Alison E. While BSc MSc PhD RGN RHV Cert Ed

    1. Professor of Community Nursing, Research in Nursing Studies Section, Florence Nightingale Division of Nursing and Midwifery, Kings College London, UK
    Search for more papers by this author

K. LouiseBarriball Research in Nursing Studies Section, Florence Nightingale Division of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, Cornwall House, Waterloo Road, London SE1 8WA, UK.

Abstract

Exploring variables underlying non-response in a survey of nurses and nurses' aides in practice¶This paper demonstrates that distinguishing between the different sources of unit response failure (i.e. refusals and non-contact) in survey research is methodologically important since minimizing non-contact and refusals requires different approaches. The findings of an interview survey show that unit response failure can be contained successfully through careful study design and management. The potential value of using resampling (i.e. obtaining some information from non-respondents) for identifying: (i) which direction, if any, the data from respondents are biased and; (ii) influencing variables on the incidence of non-response is also demonstrated.

Ancillary