Food availability and the nocturnal vs. diurnal foraging trade-off in juvenile salmon
Article first published online: 3 FEB 2004
Journal of Animal Ecology
Volume 68, Issue 2, pages 371–381, March 1999
How to Cite
Metcalfe, N. B., Fraser, N. H. C. and Burns, M. D. (1999), Food availability and the nocturnal vs. diurnal foraging trade-off in juvenile salmon. Journal of Animal Ecology, 68: 371–381. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00289.x
- Issue published online: 3 FEB 2004
- Article first published online: 3 FEB 2004
- antipredator behaviour;
- Atlantic salmon;
- diel activity rhythms;
- Salmo salar
1. Much attention has been devoted to explaining the spatial distribution of foraging animals, but rather little to their temporal distribution (i.e. whether they are diurnal, nocturnal or crepuscular). Many animals face predictable diel cycles of food availability or predation risk, and so the approach of measuring the relative ratio of mortality risk to food gained (the ‘minimize μ/f’ rule) can be applied equally as well to different time periods of the day as to alternative food patches or habitats.
2. This method is used here to investigate the diel activity patterns of juvenile Atlantic salmon, which have previously been shown to become increasingly biased towards nocturnal activity in winter, hiding for much of the day in streambed refuges. Calculations based on published data show that nocturnal foraging in winter is far safer per unit of food obtained than is diurnal, despite greatly reduced food capture efficiency at night-time light levels.
3. Using an automated activity monitoring system based on passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags, this study shows that winter diel activity patterns in salmon are dependent on food availability. A change in food density led to a parallel change in time spent in the refuge, but (as predicted by the μ/f rule) the effect was greatest at the time of day with the least favourable ratio of predation cost to feeding benefit. Thus an experimental increase in food availability led to a 16% reduction in time spent in nocturnal foraging but a 98% reduction in time spent foraging by day, with fish spending only 0·6% of the daylight hours out of the refuge at the highest food density.
4. However, brief daytime foraging bouts had a major impact on growth rates (presumably because feeding efficiency was much greater in daylight), especially when food was scarce. Daytime feeding was thus profitable in terms of rapid food acquisition but normally suboptimal in terms of risk of predation.
5. Daily activity patterns are therefore suggested to be the result of a complex trade-off between growth and survival, which takes account of diel fluctuations in food availability, food capture efficiency and predation risk; individual variation in the extent of diurnal feeding in salmon may result from state-dependent differences in the benefits of rapid feeding and growth.