You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Spatio-temporal patterns of mink and muskrat in Canada during a quarter century

  1. Hildegunn Viljugrein1,
  2. Ole CHR. Lingjærde1,2,
  3. Nils CHR. Stenseth1,*,
  4. Mark S. Boyce3

Article first published online: 20 DEC 2001

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00526.x

Issue

Journal of Animal Ecology

Journal of Animal Ecology

Volume 70, Issue 4, pages 671–682, July 2001

Additional Information

How to Cite

Viljugrein, H., Lingjærde, O. CHR., Stenseth, N. CHR. and Boyce, M. S. (2001), Spatio-temporal patterns of mink and muskrat in Canada during a quarter century. Journal of Animal Ecology, 70: 671–682. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00526.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Division of Zoology, Department of Biology, University of Oslo, PO Box 1050 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway,

  2. 2

    Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1080 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway, and

  3. 3

    Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada

* Dr Nils Chr. Stenseth; phone: + 47–22 85 45 84/61; Fax: + 47 22 85 46 05; E-mail:n.c.stenseth@bio.uio.no

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 20 DEC 2001
  2. Article first published online: 20 DEC 2001

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (841K)

Keywords:

  • Hudson’s Bay Company;
  • Mustela vison;
  • Ondatra zibethicus;
  • population cycles;
  • predator–prey interactions;
  • synchrony

Summary

  • 1
     Fur-return data on muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) and mink (Mustela vison) from 80 posts of the Hudson’s Bay Company were analysed. From each post we obtained the number of furs bought from trappers during 25 years (1925–49).
  • 2
     The ecological information content of the data was assessed using questionnaires sent to each post. We conclude that fur-return data reflect relative abundance of muskrat and mink, and not primarily information about the trappers.
  • 3
     The most-common temporal pattern of the two species are cycles with a period of 8–9 years, with muskrat cycling 1–2 years ahead of the mink. This pattern, as would be expected in a typical predator–prey relationship, is found throughout the boreal forest region, with the exception of several posts in eastern Canada. In the eastern region, the two species were found to fluctuate in synchrony.
  • 4
     The data show broad-scale synchrony. Peaks (and troughs) are roughly aligned in phase over the entire Canadian boreal forest.
  • 5
     In some areas the phase of the cycle is either ahead or behind the average cycle. Peaks (and troughs) of mink and muskrat cycles generally appear first in the Athabasca Basin region (for mink in the Hudson’s Bay region of Manitoba and Ontario) and from this epicentre spread throughout Canada within 2–3 years.
  • 6
     Synchrony (i.e. mean correlation) declines with distance; for distances less than 450 km, similarity among populations is higher than the average.
View Full Article with Supporting Information (HTML) Get PDF (841K)