1365-2656/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=4f0919eca9042f833d018453e8f48b1e3e3123ec)
1365-2656/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=92164cf20561f2dc5785bff8431569e5b40f87aa)
You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article
The population response to environmental noise: population size, variance and correlation in an experimental system
Article first published online: 19 APR 2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00601.x
1365-2656/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=e1c445961d632cd41e33852af907c4900097559b "Journal of Animal Ecology")
Additional Information
How to Cite
Benton, T. G., Lapsley, C. T. and Beckerman, A. P. (2002), The population response to environmental noise: population size, variance and correlation in an experimental system. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71: 320–332. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00601.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 19 APR 2002
- Article first published online: 19 APR 2002
- Received 1 May 2001; revision received 23 November 2001
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- gamma distribution;
- Moran effect;
- negative binomial distribution;
- Sancassania berlesei;
- stochasticity
summary
- 1Variation in an organism’s environment can influence its life history and therefore its population size. Understanding the interplay between noise and population dynamics is of considerable importance, especially for prescribing management of economically important or threatened species. The impact of noise on population biology has been the subject of frequent theoretical investigations and discussed in posthoc analyses of time-series. However, there is a dearth of experimental investigations.
- 2Here we report results from a replicated laboratory study of soil mites, Sancassania berlesei, kept in controlled environments but with food supplied randomly, with different synchrony and variances, while maintaining the same mean rate.
- 3Increasing environmental variance increases population variance, but decreases mean population size, therefore changing the observed shape of the distribution of population sizes: the shape becomes more skewed with more environmental variance.
- 4The distribution of population sizes are best described by negative binomial or gamma distributions. Log-normal and normal distributions rarely fit and Poisson distributions never fit.
- 5The correlation between populations is sensitive to the correlation in environmental noise but insensitive to its variance.
- 6Different life stages (eggs, juveniles and adults) respond differently to noise, in that there are significant differences in the way that environmental variation changes the mean, variance, shape of distribution and relationship between environmental and population synchrony.