SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Aebischer, N.J. (1999) Multi-way comparisons and generalized linear models of nest success: extensions of the Mayfield method. Bird Study, 71, 2231.
  • Blancher, P.J. & Robertson, R.J. (1982) Kingbird aggression: does it deter predation? Animal Behaviour, 30, 929930.
  • Buler, J.J. & Hamilton, R.B. (2000) Predation of natural and artificial nests in a southern pine forest. Auk, 117, 739747.
  • Bureš, S. (1997) High common vole Microtus arvalis predation on ground-nesting bird eggs and nestlings. Ibis, 139, 173174.
  • Burhans, D.E. (2000) Avoiding the nest: responses of field sparrows to the threat of nest predation. Auk, 117, 803806.
  • Burhans, D.E. & Thompson, F.R. (1998) Effects of time and nest-site characteristics on concealment of songbird nests. Condor, 100, 663672.
  • Burhans, D.E. & Thompson, F.R. (2001) Relationship of songbird nest concealment to nest fate and flushing behavior of adults. Auk, 118, 237242.
  • Butler, M.A. & Rotella, J.J. (1998) Validity of using artificial nests to assess duck-nest success. Journal of Wildlife Management, 62, 163171.
  • Clark, R.G. & Shutler, D. (1999) Avian habitat selection: Pattern from process in nest-site use by ducks? Ecology, 80, 272287.
  • Crawley, M.J. (1993) GLIM for Ecologists. Blackwell, London.
  • Cresswell, W. (1997) Nest predation: the relative effects of nest characteristics, clutch size and parental behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 53, 93103.
  • Davison, W.B. & Bollinger, E. (2000) Predation rates on real and artificial nests of grassland birds. Auk, 117, 147153.
  • Dion, N., Hobson, K.A. & Larivière, S. (2000) Interactive effects of vegetation and predators on the success of natural and simulated nests of grassland songbirds. Condor, 102, 629634.
  • Götmark, F., Blomqvist, D., Johansson, O.C. & Bergkvist, J. (1995) Nest site selection: a trade-off between concealment and view of the surroundings? Journal of Avian Biology, 26, 305312.
  • Grim, T. & Honza, M. (2001) Differences in behaviour of closely related thrushes (Turdus philomelos and T. merula) to experimental parasitism by the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus. Biologia, 56, 549556.
  • Hansson, B., Bensch, S. & Hasselquist, D. (2000) Patterns of nest predation contribute to polygyny in the Great Reed Warbler. Ecology, 81, 319328.
  • Hatchwell, B.J., Chamberlain, D.E. & Perrins, C.M. (1996) The reproductive success of blackbirds Turdus merula in relation to habitat structure and choice of nest site. Ibis, 138, 256262.
  • Hensler, G.L. (1985) Estimation and comparison of functions of daily nest survival probabilities using the Mayfield method. Statistics in Ornithology (eds B. J. T.Morgan & P. M.North), pp. 289301. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  • Hobson, K.A., Bouchart, M.L. & Sealy, S.G. (1988) Responses of naive yellow warblers to a novel nest predator. Animal Behaviour, 36, 18231830.
  • Hogstad, O. (1995) Do avian and mammalian nest predators select for different nest dispersion patterns of fieldfares Turdus pilaris? A 15-year study. Ibis, 137, 484489.
  • Hoi-Leitner, M., Nechtelberger, H. & Hoi, H. (1995) Song rate as a signal for nest site quality in blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 399405.
  • Honza, M., Oien, I.J., Moksnes, A. & Røskaft, E. (1998) Survival of reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus clutches in relation to nest position. Bird Study, 45, 104108.
  • Howlett, J.S. & Stutchbury, B.J. (1996) Nest concealment and predation in hooded warblers: experimental removal of nest cover. Auk, 113, 19.
  • Ketterson, E.D., Nolan, V., Cawthorn, M.J., Parker, P.G. & Ziegenfus, C. (1996) Phenotypic engineering: using hormones to explore the mechanistic and functional bases of phenotypic variation in nature. Ibis, 138, 7086.
  • King, D.I., Degraaf, R.M., Griffin, C.R. & Maier, T.J. (1999) Do predation rates on artificial nests accurately reflect predation rates on natural bird nests? Journal of Field Ornithology, 70, 257262.
  • Komdeur, J. & Kats, R.H. (1999) Predation risk affects trade-off between nest guarding and foraging in Seychelles warblers. Behavioral Ecology, 10, 648658.
  • Korpimäki, E., Koivunen, V. & Hakkarainen, H. (1996) Microhabitat use and behavior of voles under weasel and raptor predation risk: predator facilitation? Behavioral Ecology, 7, 3034.
  • Maier, T.J. & DeGraaf, R.M. (2000) Predation on Japanese quail vs. house sparrow eggs in artificial nests: small eggs reveal small predators. Condor, 102, 325332.
  • Major, R.E. & Kendal, C.E. (1996) The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: a review of methods and conclusions. Ibis, 138, 298307.
  • Manolis, J.C., Andersen, D.E. & Cuthbert, F.J. (2000) Uncertain nest fates in songbird studies and variation in Mayfield estimation. Auk, 117, 615626.
  • Manson, R.H. & Stiles, E.W. (1998) Links between microhabitat preferences and seed predation by small mammals in old fields. Oikos, 82, 3750.
  • Marini, M.Â. & Melo, C. (1998) Predators of quail eggs, and the evidence of the remains: implications for nest predation studies. Condor, 100, 395399.
  • Martin, T.E. (1992a) Interaction of nest predation and food limitation in reproductive strategies. Current Ornithology, Vol. 9 (ed. D. M.Power), pp. 163197. Plenum, New York.
  • Martin, T.E. (1992b) Breeding productivity considerations: What are the appropriate habitat features for management? Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrants (eds J. M.Hagan & D. W.Johnston), pp. 455473. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
  • Martin, T.E. (1998) Are microhabitat preferences of coexisting species under selection and adaptive? Ecology, 79, 656670.
  • Martin, T.E., Martin, P.R., Olson, C.R., Heidinger, B.J. & Fontaine, J.J. (2000a) Parental care and clutch sizes in North and South American birds. Science, 287, 14821485.
  • Martin, T.E., Scott, J. & Menge, C. (2000b) Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences, 267, 22872293.
  • McLean, I.G. & Rhodes, G. (1991) Enemy recognition and response in birds. Current Ornithology, Vol. 8 (ed. D. M.Power), pp. 173211. Plenum, New York.
  • McLean, I.G., Smith, J.M. & Stewart, K.G. (1986) Mobbing behavior, nest exposure, and breeding success in the American robin. Behaviour, 96, 171185.
  • Misenhelter, M.D. & Rotenberry, J.T. (2000) Choices and consequences of habitat occupancy and nest site selection in sage sparrows. Ecology, 81, 28922901.
  • Montgomerie, R.D. & Weatherhead, P.J. (1988) Risks and rewards of nest defense by parent birds. Quarterly Review of Biology, 63, 167187.
  • Murphy, M.T., Cummings, C.L. & Palmer, M.S. (1997) Comparative analysis of habitat selection, nest site and nest success by cedar waxwings (Bombycilla cedrorum) and eastern kingbirds (Tyrannus tyrannus). American Midland Naturalist, 138, 344356.
  • Pietz, P.J. & Granfors, D.A. (2000) Identifying predators and fates of grassland passerine nests using miniature video cameras. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 7187.
  • Rangen, S.A., Clark, R.G. & Hobson, K.A. (1999) Influence of nest-site vegetation and predator community on the success of artificial songbird nests. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77, 16761681.
  • Rangen, S.A., Clark, R.G. & Hobson, K.A. (2000) Visual and olfactory attributes of artificial nests. Auk, 117, 136146.
  • Ricklefs, R.E. (1977) Reactions of some Panamanian birds to human intrusion at the nest. Condor, 79, 376379.
  • SAS Institute Inc. (2000) SAS OnlineDoc., Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary. NC.
  • Schmidt, K.A. (1999) Foraging theory as a conceptual framework for studying nest predation. Oikos, 85, 151160.
  • Schmidt, K.A., Goheen, J.R. & Naumann, R. (2001a) Incidental nest predation in songbirds: behavioral indicators detect ecological scales and processes. Ecology, 82, 29372947.
  • Schmidt, K.A., Goheen, J.R., Naumann, R., Ostfeld, R.S., Schauber, E.M. & Berkowitz, A. (2001b) Experimental removal of strong and weak predators: mice and chipmunks preying on songbird nests. Ecology, 82, 29272936.
  • Söderstrom, B., Pärt, T. & Rydén, J. (1998) Different nest predator faunas and nest predation risk on ground and shrub nests at forest ecotones: an experiment and a review. Oecologia, 117, 108118.
  • Steiger, J.H. (1999) Statistica Power Analysis. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK.
  • Veen, T., Richardson, D.S., Blaakmeer, K. & Komdeur, J. (2000) Experimental evidence for innate predator recognition in the Seychelles warbler. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences, 267, 22532258.
  • Vickery, P.D., Hunter, M.L. & Wells, J.V. (1992) Evidence of incidental nest predation and its effects on nests of threatened grassland birds. Oikos, 63, 281288.
  • Weidinger, K. (2001a) Laying dates and clutch size of open-nesting passerines in the Czech Republic: a comparison of systematically and incidentally collected data. Bird Study, 48, 3847.
  • Weidinger, K. (2001b) How well do predation rates on artificial nests estimate predation on natural passerine nests? Ibis, 143, 632641.
  • Weidinger, K. (2001c) Does egg colour affect predation rate on open passerine nests? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49, 456464.
  • Willson, M.F. & Gende, S.M. (2000) Nesting success of forest birds in southeast Alaska and adjacent Canada. Condor, 102, 314324.
  • Willson, M.F., Morrison, J.L., Sieving, K.E., De Santo, T.L., Santisteban, L. & Diaz, I. (2001) Patterns of predation risk and survival of bird nests in a Chilean agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology, 15, 447456.
  • Wilson, G.R., Brittingham, M.C. & Goodrich, L.J. (1998) How well do artificial nests estimate success of real nests? Condor, 100, 357364.