You have full text access to this OnlineOpen article

Connectance in stream food webs

  1. Jenny M. Schmid-Araya1,*,
  2. Peter E. Schmid1,
  3. Anne Robertson2,
  4. Julie Winterbottom1,
  5. Charlotte Gjerløv1,3,
  6. Alan G. Hildrew1

Article first published online: 1 NOV 2002

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00668.x

Issue

Journal of Animal Ecology

Journal of Animal Ecology

Volume 71, Issue 6, pages 1056–1062, November 2002

Additional Information

How to Cite

Schmid-Araya, J. M., Schmid, P. E., Robertson, A., Winterbottom, J., Gjerløv, C. and Hildrew, A. G. (2002), Connectance in stream food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71: 1056–1062. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.00668.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK;

  2. 2

    School of Life Sciences, University of Surrey Roehampton, Whitelands College, West Hill, London SW15 3SN, UK

  3. 3

    Department of Forest Sciences, 3041–2424 Main Hall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T I124, Canada

* J.M. Schmid-Araya, School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, UK. Fax: +44 208983 0973. E-mail: J.M.Schmid-Araya@qmul.ac.uk

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 1 NOV 2002
  2. Article first published online: 1 NOV 2002
  3. Received 30 November 2001; accepted 3 July 2002

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (244K)

Keywords:

  • connectance;
  • macrofauna;
  • meiofauna;
  • stream food webs;
  • taxonomic resolution

Summary

  • 1
    The properties of food webs are important both in theoretical ecology and environmental management, yet remain elusive. Here, we examined 12 new stream food webs of higher taxonomic resolution and completeness than any previously published data set and combined them with other 10 published stream webs.
  • 2
    Compared with most previously published food webs, these stream communities (containing between 22 and 212 species) had more feeding links per species, a higher fraction of intermediate species (0·78–0·88) and lower fractions of top (0·04–0·09) and ‘basal’ species (0·07–0·15).
  • 3
    The exponent of the log link-log species relationship (S1·3) differed significantly (ancova: P < 0·001) from the link-species ‘law’ (S1) and the constant connectance hypothesis (S2). Based on these results, the link scaling law and the constant connectance hypothesis must be rejected for food webs in stream systems.
  • 4
    Connectance was markedly lower than previously reported and decreased with web size. We attribute this to the body-size disparity of organisms at the top and the bottom of the web, flow disturbance and to the high physical heterogeneity and complexity of the sedimentary habitat. All these may reduce the fraction of possible feeding links that are realized.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (244K)