Abstract
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
1. Sexual differences in behaviour and ecology have important implications for the management of harvested ungulate populations.
2. This study investigated the long-term effects of harvesting on the abundance and distribution of sexes within an introduced population of Himalayan tahr in the Two Thumb and Sibbald Ranges, New Zealand. Annual counts of tahr were made from 1984 to 1996 in two catchments subject to different harvest regimes.
3. Although populations in the two catchments increased at similar rates over the study period, their adult sex ratios diverged significantly in the late 1980s. In Carneys Creek, which was subject to unrestricted harvest, the adult sex ratio was initially equivalent to the estimated population sex ratio, but from 1991 it was significantly male-biased. In North Branch, 10 km from Carneys Creek but subject only to adult (trophy) male harvest, the population was significantly female-biased in all years.
4. There was a large and male-biased harvest in Carneys Creek in 1993, suggesting that immigration of males may have been responsible for the long-term changes in sex ratio observed there. In contrast, the harvest of males in North Branch was insufficient to explain its female-biased population.
5. Monthly counts of male and female tahr in Carneys Creek between December 1993 and February 1996 revealed a consistent seasonal change in the abundance of sub-adult males, and perhaps adult males, but not females. Sub-adult males immigrated into Carneys Creek during spring, increasing to a summer maximum before emigrating during autumn; few sub-adult males were present during winter.
6. Counts at six additional sites during summer and autumn 1996 indicated that the probable source of these males was an adjacent hunting reserve. This hunting reserve, which included North Branch, contained a female-biased population with moderate female density.
7. The observed changes appear to have been a consequence of sexual differences in habitat selection and mobility. In particular, outside the rut the larger-bodied males avoided habitats containing high densities of females.
8. Harvesting has the potential to affect the spatial distribution of age–sex classes for sexually dimorphic ungulates. Managers need to consider these effects when designing and interpreting harvest and monitoring programmes.
Introduction
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
Although many studies have illustrated the probable effects of different harvesting strategies on population size and age–sex composition in ungulates (e.g. Beddington 1974; Fairall 1985; Ginsberg & Milner-Gulland 1994; Buckland et al. 1996), there is little information on how management actions can affect the spatial distribution of sexes. Clutton-Brock, Iason & Guinness (1987) observed that male red deer avoided high densities of females, and Main & Coblentz (1996) recorded a similar pattern for mule deer Odocoileus hemionus. Since harvesting has the potential to alter density at a variety of spatial scales, it is important to understand how such exploitation can affect the distribution, and hence availability, of age–sex classes.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of two harvesting regimes on the distribution and abundance of male and female Himalayan tahr Hemitragus jemlahicus Smith in the Two Thumb & Sibbald Ranges, Southern Alps, New Zealand. From 1984 to 1996 the northern catchments of the Two Thumb Range were subject to unlimited harvesting of all age–sex classes, but only a small harvest of trophy males occurred in the remainder of the study area. In this paper (i) 13 years of population monitoring in two catchments are examined, one within each harvesting regime; (ii) annual harvesting patterns within these catchments are described; and (iii) the seasonal movements of male and female tahr within one catchment are analysed. Unexpected changes in the abundance and distribution of male tahr within the study area appear to have been a consequence of interactions between harvesting-induced changes in female density and sexual differences in behaviour.
Himalayan tahr in new zealand
Male and female tahr are strongly dimorphic; adult males average 73 kg whereas adult females weigh 36 kg (Tustin 1990). Mating peaks in May and the median birth date of tahr in the eastern Southern Alps is 30 November; twins are rare (Caughley 1971). Habitats utilized by tahr in New Zealand are similar to those used in central Nepal (Caughley 1970b). Females in New Zealand are sedentary on rock bluffs (Tustin & Parkes 1988) with home ranges of ≈ 2 km2 (Tustin 1990). The limited female dispersal that occurs appears to be density-dependent (Parkes & Tustin 1985). In contrast, adult males are frequently recorded many kilometres from the nearest female group (Anderson & Henderson 1961; Caughley 1970a).
The sexes aggregate on snow-free bluffs during winter, but are segregated outside this period (Tustin & Challies 1978; Tustin 1990; Forsyth 1997). Adult and sub-adult males form loose social groups in late winter, and move into summer habitat which may be well separated from, or interspersed between, habitat used by female groups (Caughley 1967).
Study areas
The Two Thumb and Sibbald Ranges extend eastward from the central Southern Alps and are drained by the Godley and Macaulay Rivers in the south, and by the Havelock and Rangitata Rivers in the north (Fig. 1). Elevations range from 500 m a.s.l. to > 2500 m peaks near the Main Divide. Terrain is typical of tahr habitat in the eastern Southern Alps (Tustin & Challies 1978), with extensive areas of scree and tussock intergrading with rock bluffs and, at lower altitudes, shrubland and small patches of forest (Forsyth 1997). The region receives 4000–5000 mm of precipitation annually, with rain or snow recorded on 2 days in 3 (Canterbury Regional Council, unpublished data).
Following the establishment of an overseas market for tahr meat in 1970, government and commercial helicopter-based hunting coupled with recreational hunting dramatically reduced tahr densities throughout the Southern Alps (Parkes & Tustin 1985; Parkes, Nugent & Warburton 1996; Forsyth & Hickling 1998; this study). Helicopter-based hunting continued in the Two Thumb and Sibbald Ranges until 1983 when a government moratorium prohibited the practice in this area (Hughey & Parkes 1995). Densities of tahr have subsequently increased over much of the eastern Southern Alps range (Forsyth & Hickling 1998).
Annual monitoring (see Methods) of tahr began in Carneys Creek and North Branch in 1984. These two catchments occupied different land tenures subject to contrasting harvest regimes and were considered to be representative of tahr habitat in the Two Thumb and Sibbald Ranges. North Branch was in an area of pastoral lease (termed the Godley Hunting Reserve) that leaseholders managed as a trophy-hunting area until 1996. Only adult male tahr (≥5 years old; see Parkes & Tustin 1988) were harvested in North Branch during 1984–92 (G. Joll, unpublished data) but, beginning in 1993, a new leaseholder conducted some helicopter-based control of females and juveniles.
The upper Havelock River, and Carneys Creek in particular, has traditionally been a popular area for recreational tahr hunting (Challies & Thomson 1989). During 1984–96, recreational hunting was actively encouraged as a means of controlling tahr by the New Zealand Forest Service (1984–87) and the New Zealand Department of Conservation (1987–96). Free hunting permits were issued to recreational hunters with no restrictions on the number, age, or sex of tahr harvested. The area east of Carneys Creek, in the northern Two Thumb Range, was pastoral lease. In contrast to North Branch, recreational hunters had virtually unrestricted access to this lease. For simplicity, the portion of the northern Two Thumb Range that was subject to unrestricted recreational hunting is termed the Rangitata Hunting Area.
North Branch and Carneys Creek, ≈ 10 km apart, are of similar size (20·4 and 19·1 km2, respectively) and habitat. Seasonal habitat selection by tahr was evaluated in Carneys Creek in an associated study (Forsyth 1997). Habitat availability was estimated in 1995–96 by digitizing aerial photographs in three seasons (spring, summer–autumn, and winter). In winter, only the steepest rock and grass bluffs were free of snow. Grasslands and shrublands became available at lower altitudes in spring. During summer and autumn only a few small areas of permanent snow and ice remained.
Discussion
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
Female tahr give birth to similar numbers of male and female offspring (Caughley 1966), so in 1991–96 the Carneys Creek female population was insufficient to produce the number of sub-adult males present during the annual summer or autumn counts (Fig. 3). Sub-adult, and perhaps adult, males immigrated into Carneys Creek in spring, stayed for summer, and then emigrated during autumn; few males were present in winter (Fig. 4). The probable source of these males was the Godley Hunting Reserve (Fig. 5). During the 1993–96 monthly counts, adult and sub-adult male tahr were frequently observed moving in and out of Carneys Creek along the axial ridge of the Two Thumb Range during spring, summer, and autumn. In January and February 1996 the Godley Hunting Reserve contained, relative to the high densities of the 1960s, moderate densities of females but few males. From 1984 to 1992, only 30–40 adult trophy males (≥ 5 years) and no females were harvested annually from this area (G. Joll, unpublished data). However, during winter 1995 c. 2000 tahr were culled from throughout Godley Hunting Reserve by the leaseholder, so the densities of females recorded there during summer 1996 were likely to have been lower than during the previous few years.
The extreme male-biased recreational hunter harvest recorded in Carneys Creek in 1993 is unlikely to represent only hunter selectivity for males (Table 2). A subsequent postal survey of legal recreational hunters (Davys, Forsyth & Hickling 1999) recorded a significantly male-biased harvest in the Havelock watershed during 1994–95 (see Fig. 1), but not in the more northern Clyde watershed. The Clyde watershed would have been too geographically separated to receive immigrant males from the Godley Hunting Reserve, suggesting that the harvest recorded in Carneys Creek in 1993 was facilitated by immigration of males. The annual counts (Fig. 3) indicate that significant immigration of male tahr born within the Godley Hunting Reserve into Carneys Creek began about 1989. In that year the number of males counted in Carneys Creek began to increase.
The seasonal migration of sub-adult male tahr recorded in this study appears to be related to long-term changes in the density of females within the Godley Hunting Reserve. There is strong circumstantial evidence that female density affects habitat use by male tahr when the sexes are segregated. In 1965, when tahr were at high density throughout the Two Thumb and Sibbald ranges (Caughley 1967; Tustin & Challies 1978), few males summered in Carneys Creek and large female-juvenile groups were observed in the two areas (sites B and D in Fig. 2) that did not contain females in this study. During 1993–96 the seasonal changes in abundance of sub-adult males in Carneys Creek were significantly greater in the non-female sites compared to the female sites. Furthermore, few sub-adult males were observed within the Godley Hunting Reserve during summer 1996, despite this class not being harvested there. These results suggest that the larger-bodied sub-adult male tahr avoid habitats utilized by females when sexually segregated. Illius & Gordon (1987) showed that a sexual size dimorphism of only 20% could lead to swards becoming unprofitable for males if grazing reduced mean sward height below some critical threshold (see also Clutton-Brock & Harvey 1983), and Clutton-Brock, Iason & Guinness (1987) argued that such a mechanism was responsible for increased sexual segregation in red deer at high population density. Permanent vegetation monitoring plots were established in North Branch in 1990–92, and in Carneys Creek in 1992, and were remeasured in 1996 and 1997, respectively (Parkes & Thomson 1998). Most indices of tussock biomass and health declined in North Branch, but not in Carneys Creek (Parkes & Thomson 1998). Male tahr thus appear to avoid areas of high female density when segregated due to the overgrazing of preferred food species (see also Caughley 1970c,d).
In this study two harvest regimes, unrestricted harvest vs. limited adult male harvest, created low and moderate female densities, respectively. Emigration of male tahr from the moderate female density area to the low female density area during the period of sexual segregation resulted in an extremely male-biased harvest in the latter area. Age- and sex-specific differences in seasonal distribution apparently resulted from asymmetries in philopatry, mobility, and resource selection.
Harvesting activities that impact on population density can significantly affect the spatial distribution of age–sex classes in sexually dimorphic ungulates. In situations where ungulates are controlled to protect environmental values, such as tahr in the Southern Alps of New Zealand, management will often necessitate large and instantaneous population reductions within management units. These reductions may alter habitat use by segregated males and females in a non-linear fashion relative to the population reduction. The potential for such effects is particularly evident near the border of management units (i.e. areas subject to different control intensities, as occurred in this study). Managers need to understand how age- and sex-specific differences in behaviour interact with changing population density, and should consider the potential for such effects when designing and interpreting both harvest and monitoring programmes.
Recommendations
Considerable money is spent attempting to mitigate the impacts of tahr on indigenous flora in the Southern Alps of New Zealand (Tustin 1990). Current management involves maintaining tahr populations below specified ‘intervention densities’ at which grasslands are modified (Department of Conservation 1993). Densities of tahr are monitored by annual summer or autumn counts in sample catchments spread throughout the breeding range. This study demonstrates how careful interpretation of spatial and temporal trends in the abundance of age–sex classes can illuminate population changes at larger spatial scales. However, this ability relies on observers being able to differentiate accurately between age–sex classes. It is thus recommended that observers be sufficiently trained to be able to classify accurately tahr as ‘sub-adult male’, ‘adult male’, ‘female’, or ‘juvenile’.
Although the total summer population in Carneys Creek has exceeded the intervention density specified for that management unit (2·5 tahr km–2; Department of Conservation 1993) since 1990, a control operation that did not target the source of the migrant males (i.e. Godley Hunting Reserve) would have achieved only a short-term reduction in density, with seasonal immigration of males continuing to occur. Because of the spatial segregation of males from females outside winter, intervention densities monitored through summer counts should be defined and interpreted in terms of age–sex classes. In particular, using female density rather than total density would remove uncertainty resulting from the mobility of male tahr outside winter and their apparent preference for areas containing low densities of females.
Acknowledgements
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- References
I thank the many New Zealand Forest Service, New Zealand Forest Research Institute, New Zealand Department of Conservation, and Landcare Research New Zealand employees who participated in the annual Carneys Creek and North Branch counts, in particular: D.C. Anderson, N. Bolton, C.N. Challies, M.C. Coleman, S. Harraway, K. Lange, C. Pearson, and C. Thomson. K.F.D. Hughey, J. Andrew, and D.C. Anderson (New Zealand Department of Conservation, Canterbury) were instrumental in prohibiting hunting within Carneys Creek during 1994–96. L. Prouting provided periodic aerial transport to Carneys Creek, the use of huts on Mesopotamia Station, and permission to count tahr in Camp Creek. I thank R.J. Barker and C.M. Frampton for statistical advice, and K.G. Tustin for permission to cite unpublished data. Comments by G.J. Hickling, J.P. Parkes, V.C. Bleich, R.J. Barker, J. Hone, M. Festa-Bianchet, and two anonymous referees improved the manuscript. Funding was provided by New Zealand Department of Conservation Research Grant 1894 & a Lincoln University Doctoral Scholarship.