Colonization of grassland by sown species: dispersal versus microsite limitation in responses to management
Article first published online: 10 MAY 2002
Journal of Applied Ecology
Volume 38, Issue 1, pages 204–216, February 2001
How to Cite
Coulson, S. J., Bullock, J. M., Stevenson, M. J. and Pywell, R. F. (2001), Colonization of grassland by sown species: dispersal versus microsite limitation in responses to management. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38: 204–216. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00585.x
- Issue published online: 10 MAY 2002
- Article first published online: 10 MAY 2002
- hay cutting;
- Leucanthemum vulgare;
- Rhinanthus minor
- 1Diversification of species-poor grassland often requires the introduction of desirable species by sowing seed. Little is known about the factors controlling the spread of introduced species, or how these interact with management. We determined whether management affected spread rates of two grassland species by modifying seed dispersal or seedling establishment.
- 2An experiment was set up in 1995 on a species-poor grassland. It comprised five blocks, each with four treatments: (1) autumn grazed only; (2) cut July; (3) cut July and September; (4) cut July and aftermath grazed. Twenty-two plant species were separately slot-seeded into each treatment plot, providing discrete linear colonization foci.
- 3The mechanisms controlling spread were studied in two species: Rhinanthus minor, an annual with large seeds adapted for wind dispersal; and Leucanthemum vulgare, a perennial with small seeds with no obvious dispersal adaptations.
- 4Perpendicular spread of each species by 1998 was described well by a simple inverse power model. Rhinanthus had spread further in the hay-cut treatments (2–4) than in the grazed treatment (1). Leucanthemum spread poorly in all plots, with no treatment effects.
- 5Seed dispersal from source slots was also described well by the inverse power model. Dispersal curves for Rhinanthus were much longer in the hay-cut treatment (3) than in the grazed treatment (1), because more seed dispersed during hay cutting than before, and cutting dispersed seed longer distances. There was no dispersal by grazing animals. Dispersal showed directional effects: seeds travelled further in the prevailing wind direction before the hay-cut and in the grazed treatment; dispersal by hay cutting was further in the cut direction than in the opposite direction.
- 6Leucanthemum showed poor dispersal, with no treatment effects, except that more seeds were dispersed in the grazed (1) than the hay-cut (3) treatment.
- 7The establishment and survival of sown seeds showed no treatment effects for either species.
- 8Management effects on the spread of Rhinanthus reflected effects on dispersal, rather than establishment. Leucanthemum showed poor dispersal but good establishment in all treatments, suggesting its spread may also have been dispersal-limited. Rhinanthus was positively affected by hay cutting because it set seed at the time of cutting, whereas Leucanthemum set seed later and cutting reduced its seed production.
- 9The results indicate that management of grassland to enhance the colonization of sown species might be best targeted at enhancing seed-dispersal distances. Hay cutting can do this, but must coincide with seed set.