SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • adherence;
  • gastrointestinal tract;
  • inhibition;
  • Lactobacillus;
  • pathogens;
  • probiotic

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

Aims: The study of two human strains of Lactobacillus to be used as probiotics in the gastrointestinal tract.

Methods and Results: The Lactobacillus acidophilus UO 001 and Lact. gasseri UO 002, were resistant to the gastrointestinal conditions (pH 2 and 3, presence of pepsin, pancreatin or bile salts), the resistance was enhanced in the presence of skimmed milk. Additionally, adhered to Caco-2 cells through glycoproteins in Lact. gasseri and carbohydrates in the case of Lact. acidophilus. These strains are able to inhibit the growth of certain enteropathogens: Salmonella, Listeria and Campylobacter without interfering with the normal microbiota of the gastrointestinal tract, as stated by using the mixed culture and the spot agar test. Finally, strongly adherent Lact. gasseri were found to inhibit the attachment of Escherichia coli O111 to intestinal Caco-2 cells under the condition of exclusion.

Conclusions: These results indicate that the two strains of Lactobacillus from human origin present important properties for survival in, and colonization of, the gastrointestinal tract, that give them potential probiotic.

Significance and Impact of the Study: Two strains of Lactobacillus isolated from human vagina of healthy premenopausal women could be promising candidates to be used in the preparation of probiotic products and for their use as health-promoting bacteria.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

Probiotics have been used in animal production for the last two decades, their efficiency on animal performance having been widely discussed. However, the mode of action of probiotics still remains unclear. It has been proposed that probiotics could maintain the healthy intestinal microbiota through competitive exclusion and antagonistic action against pathogenic bacteria in the animal intestine (Fuller 1989).

The ability of lactic acid bacteria to inhibit the growth of various Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria is well known. This inhibition may be due to the production of organic acids such as lactic and acetic acid (Gilliland and Speck 1977), hydrogen peroxide, bacteriocins, bacteriocin-like substances and possibly biosurfactants (Velraeds et al. 1996), which are active against certain pathogens and may be produced by different species of Lactobacillus. On the other hand, several studies have suggested that adhesive probiotic bacteria could prevent the attachment of pathogens and stimulate their removal from the infected intestinal tract (Lee et al. 2000).

These antagonistic properties could be very useful in probiotic products. Apart from this, successful probiotic bacteria should be able to survive gastric conditions and colonize the intestine, at least temporarily, by adhering to the intestinal epithelium (Lee and Salminen 1995). Such probiotic microorganisms appear to be promising candidates for the treatment of intestinal disorders produced by abnormal gut microflora and altered gut mucosal barrier functions (Salminen et al. 1996a, 1996b; Álvarez-Olmos and Oberhelman 2001). The most studied probiotics are the lactic acid bacteria, particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium.

This paper reports a study of two human strains of Lactobacillus described in a previous report (Boris et al. 1998) that presents properties that may allow their use as biotherapeutic agents in the genitourinary tract. Other characteristics such as acid and bile tolerance, adherence to intestinal epithelial cells and the antagonistic effect in vitro against certain enteropathogenic bacteria, three important properties for survival in, and colonization of, the gastrointestinal tract are described.

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

Lactobacillus acidophilus UO 001 and Lact. gasseri UO 002, two previously characterized (Boris et al. 1997; Boris et al. 1998) vaginal isolates, were employed in this study. The other bacterial strains used as enteropathogens were clinical specimens: Escherichia coli O111, Salmonella choleraesuis serotype Enteritidis, Yersinia enterocolitica, Staphylococcusaureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter jejuni, Clostridium difficile and Cl. perfringens. The following were used as members of normal microbiota: E. coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Bacteroides fragilis and Bifidobacterium bifidum CECT 870. All strains except Bif. bifidum were obtained at the Hospital Monte Naranco and the Hospital Central de Asturias (Oviedo).

Lactobacilli were incubated on LAPTg broth or agar (Raibaud et al. 1961). Other media such as eosin–methylene-blue (Oxoid) were used for enterobacterias; KF agar (Scharlau, Barcelona, Spain) for Ent. faecalis; Campylobacter medium (Oxoid) for Camp. jejuni, BHI (Biokar, Beauvais, France) for Listeria; TGY (Tryptone 30 g l−1, yeast extract 20 g l−1, glucose 5 g l−1 and thioglycolic acid sodium salt 1 g l−1) for Cl. perfringens and Cl. difficile; TPY (Adsa, Barcelona, Spain) for Bifidobacterium and TPY supplemented with haemine (5 μg ml−1) for Bacteroides and Chapman (Pronadisa, Madrid, Spain) for Staph. aureus.

The incubation temperature was 37°C. The strains were incubated in aerobic conditions, except for Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium and Clostridium, which were propagated under anaerobiosis.

Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

Simulated gastric digestion was tested essentially as described in (Zárate et al. 2000). Briefly, 50 ml of LAPTg medium were inoculated at 2% (v/v) with lactobacilli strains and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. After washing in sterile saline solution (NaCl, 0·9%) and centrifugation, the cell suspensions were added to 50 ml of artificial gastric juice with the following composition: NaCl, 125 mmol l−1; KCl 7 mmol l−1; NaHCO3, 45 mmol l−1 and pepsin, 3 g l−1. The final pH was adjusted with HCl to pH 2 and 3 and with NaOH to pH 7. The bacterial suspensions were incubated with agitation (200 rev min−1) to simulated peristalsis. Aliquots were taken for the enumeration of viable at 0, 90 and 180 min. The effect of gastric digestion was also determined by suspending the cells in skimmed milk instead of saline solution before the inoculation of gastric juice at pH 2.

As described in Zárate et al. (2000), simulated intestinal fluid was prepared by suspending the cells (after 180 min of gastric digestion) in 0·1% (wt/v) pancreatin (Sigma) and 0·15% (w/v) Oxgall bile salts (Sigma) in water and adjusting it to pH 8·0 with 5 mol l−1 NaOH. The suspensions were incubated as above and samples for total viable counts were taken at 0, 90 and 180 min.

Adherence assays

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

The adherence of lactobacilli to Caco-2 cells was examined as previously described (Coconnier et al. 1992). Briefly, the Caco-2 monolayers were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7·3. For each adhesion assay, 1 ml of Lactobacillus suspension (108 bacteria per ml in PBS) was added to each well of the tissue culture plate, which was incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. After 90 min of incubation, the monolayer was washed five times with sterile PBS, fixed with methanol, stained with Gram stain and examined microscopically. Each adherence assay was conducted in duplicate over three successive passages of intestinal cells. For each monolayer on a glass coverslip, the number of adherent bacteria was counted in 20 random microscopic areas. Adhesion of lactobacilli was expressed as the number of bacteria adhering to 100 Caco-2 cells. Lact. delbrueckii subsp. lactis UO 004 (an intestinal isolate) and Lact. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (dairy origin) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively, for adherence.

The bacteria were subjected to various treatments in order to characterize the bacterial determinants involved in lactobacilli adhesion. The bacterial suspension was heated to 100°C in a water bath for 10 min and cooled by immersion in an ice bath. Treatments with trypsin (2·5 mg ml−1, 37°C, 1 h), lipase from Rhizopus arrhizus (Sigma, Madrid, Spain) (2·5 mg ml−1, 37°C, 1 h), sodium metaperiodate (10 mg ml−1, 1 h, room temperature) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (20 mmol l−1 ) in PBS at pH 7·02 were performed as described previously (Barrow et al. 1980; Chauviére et al. 1992). The adherence experiment was performed as indicated above.

At the same time, in order to confirm the results obtained above, a radiolabelled method was used (Greene and Kleanhammer 1994). In our case LAPTg replaced MRS as culture medium.

In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

Lactobacilli were tested for inhibition of representative gastrointestinal tract pathogens using two methods: the mixed culture (Bathia et al. 1989) and the agar spot test described in Jacobsen et al. (1999). In the former, lactobacilli and the enteropathogens were incubated separately in LAPTg broth under aerobiosis until O.D.600=0·6. Aliquots of each Lactobacillus culture were mixed with equal volumes of each of the enteropathogen cultures and incubation was resumed. Samples from the mixed cultures were plated at 4-h intervals for 24 h on the appropriated media. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h and colony-forming units (CFU) counted (Bathia et al. 1989). The experiment was performed twice. The method described by Jacobsen et al. (1999) was used for the agar spot test. Briefly, aliquots of 2 μ1 of test cultures were seeded onto LAPTg agar plates and incubated for 24 h. Thereafter, 100 μl of the overnight cultures of the indicator bacteria were mixed with 7 ml of soft agar (7 g l−1) using the aforementioned medium for each strain. The plates were then incubated at 37°C for 48 h in aerobiosis, anaerobiosis or in a 5% CO2 atmosphere, depending on the tested strain, and inhibition zones were observed. When clear zones reached more than 1 mm, these were scored as positive. Each test was performed twice. This method was used for Listeria, Campylobacter and Clostridium sp.

Similar methods were used in the case of some strains of the normal microbiota, the mixed culture for Ent. faecalis and E. coli and the second one for Bact. fragilis and Bif. bifidum.

Identification of the inhibitor

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

To further determine the properties of the inhibitor, Supernatants of Lact. acidophilus cultures (24 h) were subjected to different treatments: (i) sensitivity to proteases; trypsin and proteinase K were added to a final concentration of 1 mg ml−1, incubated at 37°C for 1 h, and the samples were adjusted to pH 4 with 1 m HCl; (ii) heat; 100°C for 30 min; (iii) ammonium sulphate precipitation (85%); the pellet was resuspended in distilled water and the supernatant was dialysed using a dialysis membrane with a pore exclusion unit of 1200 Da; (iv) chloroform extraction; the chloroform was combined with an equal volume of filtered supernatant, shaken and allowed to separate, the organic phase was evaporated and resuspended in saline solution at pH 3; (v) the 24-h culture supernatant of Lact. acidophilus was incubated with 250 μg l−1l-lactic dehydrogenase (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MD, USA) for 2 h at 37°C.

All the samples were tested using the well diffusion assay (Schilinger and Lucke 1989), the plates being prepared by adding 100 μl from an overnight culture of E. coli O 111 to 10 ml of LAPTg containing 1·2% (w/v) agar. After solidification, wells (5-mm diameter) were made with a sterile cork-borer and filled with 15 μl of each sample.

Interference assays

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

Interference experiments were performed with E. coli O111 and Lact. gasseri, as they showed a significant capacity to adhere to Caco-2 cells. The procedures described in (Spencer and Chesson 1990) were used. Briefly, for the exclusion tests, Lact. gasseri (108 CFU ml−1 ) were added to Caco-2 monolayers and incubated together for 45 min; radiolabelled E. coli (108 CFU ml−1) was subsequently added, and incubation was continued for a further 45 min. For competition tests, Lactobacillus and the radiolabelled pathogen were added to wells and incubated for 90 min. For displacement tests, the radiolabelled E. coli was added to Caco-2 monolayers and incubated together for 45 min, Lact. gasseri was then added, and incubation was continued for a further 45 min.

Subsequently, the monolayers were washed and solubilized as described in the adherence assays. Samples harvested were added to 10 ml of scintillation liquid and counted in a scintillation model Rack Beta 1211 LKB counter (Turku, Finland).

The controls used were the following: C1, a suspension of radiolabelled E. coli in PBS pH 7·3; C2, the Caco-2 cells incubated with 1 ml of PBS pH 7·3; and C3, the Caco-2 cells incubated with 500 μl of radiolabelled E. coli and 500 μl of PBS pH 7·3.

The percentage of the total added radioactivity associated with the washed monolayers was calculated by the equation:

  • image

Each assay was conducted in triplicate twice.

Statistical analysis

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

Two-factor analysis of variance (anova) was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the experimental results. Factor one represents the three conditions (i.e. exclusion, competition and displacement) and the control group. The second was a factor block with two levels, one of which represents an independent repetition of the experiment; all measurements being carried out with a minimum of duplicate samples per variable for each experiment.

Data are expressed as mean ± typical deviation and the posteriori comparison was analysed by the Tukey's DHS. The statistical significance for treatments and posteriori test was P < 0·01.

Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

As can be seen in Fig. 1, at pH 3 any Lactobacillus present a decrease in the viability at least during 3 h of incubation, whereas at pH 2 Lact. acidophilus and Lact. gasseri survive during 90 min. When milk was added (pH 2·5) the viability was recovered in all cases.

image

Figure 1. Effect of digestion by gastric (solid lines) and intestinal fluids (dotted lines) on the survival of Lact. acidophilus UO 001 (a) and Lact. gasseri UO 002 (b) at pH 2 (•), pH 3 (▴), and pH 7 (▪) and in gastric juice pH 2 plus skimmed milk (○)

Download figure to PowerPoint

With respect to the intestinal fluid, Lact. acidophilus seem to be slightly more resistant than Lact. gasseri. As we stated previously, the presence of milk stimulated survival in all the strains and situations (Fig. 1).

Adherence to Caco-2 cells

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

Lactobacillus gasseri strongly adhered to Caco-2 cells similar to the positive control, an intestinal isolate, Lact. delbrueckii subsp. lactis, whereas Lact. acidophilus adhered in least numbers (Table 1). These results were confirmed by a radiolabelled method. The results are expressed as the adherence rate, i.e. the ratio between the number of the bacteria added to the cell monolayer and the remaining adhered bacteria. This is 3·23 ± 0·99 % in Lact. gasseri and 1·39 ± 0·55 % for Lact. acidophilus.

Table 1.  Ability of Lactobacillus acidophilus UO 001 and Lact. gasseri UO 002 to adhere to Caco-2 cells
StrainNo. of adherent cells (mean ± SD)
Lact. delbrueckii subsp. lactis (intestinal isolate)213·9 ± 17·5
Lact. gasseri233·9 ± 55·4
Lact. acidophilus168·6 ± 39·9
Lact. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (dairy origin)35·08 ± 13·02

The biochemical characterization of the adhesion (Table 2) revealed that this involved protease- and metaperiodate-sensitive factors on the bacterial surface (possibly glycoproteins) in Lact. gasseri, whereas in the case of Lact. acidophilus heat-labile carbohydrates requiring divalent cations are involved in the adherence.

Table 2.  Nature of the adhesins of Lactobacillus sp. for Caco-2 cells
TreatmentNo. of adherent cells (mean ± SD) of:
Lact. acidophilusLact. gasseri
  1. *P < 0·001 compared with the Lact. acidophilus control.

  2. P < 0·001 compared with the Lact. gasseri control.

  3. EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; ND, nor determined; SD, standard deviation.

None (control)168·6 ± 39·9 (100%)233·9 ± 55·4 (100%)
Trypsin (1 mg/ml−1)164·8 ± 40 (97·8%)25·4 ± 10·6 (10·8%)†
Lipase (1 mg/ml−1)182·7 ± 31 (108%)174·2 ± 52·8 (74·5%)
Sodium metaperiodate  (10 mg/ml−1)46·9 ± 23·1 (27·8%)*5·3 ± 1·9 (2·3%)†
Heat (100°C)55·9 ± 25·3 (35·5%)*208·9 ± 24·8 (89·3%)
EDTA (20 mm)54·5 ± 18·5 (32·3%)*ND

Interaction with normal microbiota

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

When each Lactobacillus strain is incubated in mixed culture with Ent. faecalis, no differences in the viability were observed with respect to the control (Fig. 2). Similar results were obtained for E. coli (data not shown). In the case of B. bifidum and Bact. fragilis, the agar spot test described in Methods was used. No inhibition was observed with any Lactobacillus (data not shown).

image

Figure 2. Effect of Lactobacillus sp. on Enterococcus faecalis growth. Control culture (black bar) mixed culture with Lact. acidophilus UO 001 (patterned bar), and with Lact. gasseri UO 002 (white bar)

Download figure to PowerPoint

Inhibition of enteropathogens

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

In relation to the interaction between the lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, complete inactivation was observed after 7 h of mixed incubation of Lact. acidophilus or Lact. gasseri with Salm. choleraesuis, Y. enterocolitica or E. coli O111. Only slight inhibition was detected in the case of S. aureus (Fig. 3).

image

Figure 3. Interaction between Lactobacillus sp. and enteropathogenic bacteria. Mixed culture assay with (a) Salmonella choleraesuis serotype Enteritidis; (b) Staphylococcus aureus (•), control culture, (○), enteropathogen with Lact. acidophilus UO 001, (□), enteropathogen with Lact. gasseri UO 002

Download figure to PowerPoint

On the other hand, when the spot agar method was used for Clostridium sp., Campylobacter, or Listeria, a strong inhibition was observed (data not shown).

In order to characterize the inhibitory compound produced by Lactobacillus, its culture supernatant was assayed for the presence of bacteriocin and organic acids. The active component of the supernatants was small, as judged by its solubility in up to 85% ammonium sulphate, its pass-through dialysis tubing with a pore exclusion limit of 1200 Da and its resistance to heat (100°C for 30 min). In addition, its polar nature was confirmed because it was not extractable with chloroform. Finally, it was resistant to proteinase K, which discarded the assumption that it was a bacteriocin. Similar results were obtained from supernatants of lactobacilli incubated in aerobiosis, in a 5% CO2 atmosphere or anaerobically, which indicated that the inhibitor was not H2O2. All these data were compatible with an organic acid and most probably lactic acid, given the homofermentative metabolism of the lactobacilli under study and the loss of antibacterial activity of Lact. acidophillus after l-lactic dehydrogenase treatment (Fig. 4).

image

Figure 4. Analysis of the inhibitor produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus UO 001 against E. coli O111. (1) Lactobacillus cells washed with distilled water; (2) concentrated supernatant of the culture; (3) redisolved sediment after precipitation of the supernatant with 85% ammonium sulphate; (4) supernatant dialysed through a membrane with a pore limit of 1200 Da; (5) supernatant treated with proteinase K; (6) supernatant heated at 100°C; (7) supernatant treated with lactate dehydrogenase; (8) aqueous and (9) organic fractions after chloroform extraction

Download figure to PowerPoint

Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

A large reduction in adherence of E. coli was observed when Lact. gasseri was incubated with Caco-2 monolayers before the addition of the pathogen, indicating that a phenomenon of exclusion exists, presumably by having the same cellular receptors. This fact was statistically significant as can be seen in Table 3.

Table 3.  Effect of Lactobacillus gasseri on the attachment of E. coli O111 to Caco-2 cells under conditions of exclusion, competition and displacement
ConditionPercentage of adherence (mean ± T.D.)
Trial 1Trial 2
  1. *Adhesion levels significantly different (P < 0·01).

Control1·52 ± 0·073· 45 ± 0·35
Competition1·20 ± 0·643·02 ± 0·62
Exclusion0·16 ± 0·14*1·48 ± 0·53*
Displacement1·60 ± 0·332·77 ± 0·88

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

The first requirement for a probiotic bacterium is its ability to survive transport to the active site in which its beneficial action is expected. Hence, the bacteria destined to benefit intestinal functions must survive passage through the acidic environment to the stomach. The gastric pH in healthy humans is about 2–2·5. As demonstrated, Lact. acidophilus and Lact. gasseri survive under these conditions for at least 90 min, which could be enough to reach their action site in the intestine.

The resistance to bile salts is another important character, which could explain the inefficiency of some commercial preparations of probiotics. It is quite difficult to suggest a precise concentration to which the selected strain should be tolerant (Havenaar et al. 1992). The lactobacilli tested in this study were not lysed in the presence of bile salts (0·15%) and seem to be resistant to gastric and intestinal conditions, above all, in the presence of skimmed milk, as also was observed for Lact. casei 212·3 (Charteris et al. 1998) and for propionibacteria (Velraeds et al. 1996), showing that Emmental cheeses exerted a protective effect. This is important in order to use these strains as dietary adjuncts in dairy functional foods.

Adhesion of the probiotic microorganisms to the intestinal mucosa is a prerequisite for colonization and for antagonistic activity against enteropathogens (Owehand 1998). Upon reaching the intestine, the probiotics must attach to the brush border of microvilli or adhere to the mucus layer in order not to be swept from the colon by peristalsis. The adherence assay was carried out using the human intestinal cell line Caco-2, a well-characterized cellular lineage established from a human colonic adenocarcinoma (Fogh et al. 1977). The ability of Lactobacillus to adhere to the differentiated Caco-2 cells varies considerably between species, as different authors (Chauviére et al. 1992; Coconnier et al. 1992; Bernet et al. 1993; Green and Kleanhammer 1994) have reported. In our case, Lact. gasseri is the most adherent.

Multiple components of the bacterial cell surface seem to participate in the adherence of the strains to intestinal epithelial cells. In Lact. gasseri, adherence involved proteins and carbohydrates (possibly glycoproteins), while Lact. acidophilus seemed to depend on carbohydrates; in this case, divalent cations, probably Ca2+, were also involved in adherence. The results are consistent with previous findings in which it was reported that lactobacilli adhere to human intestinal cells by means of a mechanism that involves different combinations of carbohydrate and protein factors on the bacterial cell surface (Chauviére et al. 1992; Coconnier et al. 1992; Bernet et al. 1993; Green and Kleanhammer 1994). The same components are also involved in lactobacilli adherence to vaginal cells (Boris et al. 1998). In contrast, lipoteichoic acid is responsible for Lactobacillus adherence to uroepithelial cells (Chan et al. 1985).

Lactic acid bacteria have been shown to inhibit the in vitro growth of many enteric pathogens and have been used in both humans and animals to treat a broad range of gastrointestinal disorders (Rolfe 2000). Lact. acidophilus and Lact. gasseri have been shown in vitro to strongly inhibit same enteropathogenic bacteria without interfering with the normal bacterial residents of the gastrointestinal tract, lactic acid could account for this antimicrobial activity. Similar results were reported for other strains of Lactobacillus isolated from chickens that inhibited Salmonella and E. coli growth (Jin et al. 1996) and a strain of Lact. acidophilus that inhibited Camp. pylori (McGroarty and Reid 1988), also because of the production of lactic acid.

Competitive inhibition for bacterial adhesion sites on intestinal epithelial surfaces is another mechanism of action for probiotics. The results of competitive binding assays clearly showed that Lact. gasseri effect the attachment of enteropathogen E. coli to Caco-2 cells under the condition of exclusion; Coconnier (Coconnier et al. 1992) also observed that lactobacilli have been shown to exclude enterotoxigenic E. coli from Caco-2 cells.

Recently great interest has arisen in the possibility of deliberately feeding beneficial microorganisms to humans as an alternative to antibiotic therapy in gastrointestinal disorders, probiotics being an attractive treatment alternative (Rolfe 2000). There have been hundreds of publications describing the use of probiotics to prevent and treat a variety of gastrointestinal disorders. However, only a relatively few studies have contributed convincingly to the health effects of probiotics in humans.

The results obtained in vitro do not allow direct extrapolation on the behaviour of lactobacilli, although they are an indication of the possible ability of the strains as probiotics. In particular, the inhibition of pathogens observed in vitro might be a method for screening potentially efficient strains for sanitary purposes. We conclude that these organisms possess a number of interesting properties that constitute the basis for their use as health-promoting bacteria and warrant further clinical investigations. Studies in vivo are under investigation.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References

This research was funded by grant AGL2000-1611-C03-03 from the “DGCYT” of the Spanish Ministry of Education. M.F. Fernández was the recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from the ‘Ministerio de Educación y Cultura’. Spain.

We wish to thank Dr. J. Méndez and Dr. F. Vázquez for their kind gift of clinical specimens, which made this work possible, and Dr. N. Corral for helping in the statistical analysis.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Bacterial strains and culture conditions
  6. Resistance to artificial gastric and intestinal fluids
  7. Adherence assays
  8. In vitro interaction between lactobacilli and some enteropathogens, and with some members of the normal microbiota
  9. Identification of the inhibitor
  10. Interference assays
  11. Statistical analysis
  12. Results
  13. Effect of gastric and intestinal digestion on the viability of human lactobacilli
  14. Adherence to Caco-2 cells
  15. Interaction with normal microbiota
  16. Inhibition of enteropathogens
  17. Adhesion interference of intestinal pathogens
  18. Discussion
  19. Acknowledgements
  20. References
  • Álvarez-Olmos, M. and Oberhelman, R.A. (2001) Probiotic agents and infection diseases: A modern perspective on a traditional therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases 32, 15671576.
  • Barrow, P. A., Brooker, B.E., Fuller, R. and Newport, M.J. (1980) The attachment of bacteria to the gastric epithelium of the pig and its importance in the microecology of the intestine. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 48, 147154.
  • Bathia, S.J., Kochar, N., Abraham, P., Nair, N.G. and Mehta, A.P. (1989) Lactobacillus acidophilus inhibits growth of Campylobacter pylori in vitro. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 27, 23282330.
  • Bernet, M.F., Brassart, D., Neeser, J.R. and Servin, A.L. (1993) Adhesion of human bifidobacterial strains to cultured human intestinal epithelial cells and inhibition of enteropathogen-cell interactions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59, 41214128.
  • Boris, S., Suárez, J.E. and Barbés, C. (1997) Characterization of the aggregation promoting factor from Lactobacillus gasseri, a vaginal isolate. Journal of Applied Microbiology 83, 413420.
  • Boris, S., Suárez, J.E., Vázquez, F. and Barbés, C. (1998) Adherence of human vaginal lactobacilli to vaginal epithelial cells and interaction with uropathogens. Infection and Immunity 66, 19851989.
  • Coconnier, M.H., Klaenhammer, T.R., Kernéis, S., Bernet, M.F. and Servin, A.L. (1992) Protein-mediated adhesion of Lactobacillus acidophilus BG2FO4 on human enterocyte and mucus-secreting cell lines in culture. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58, 20342039.
  • Chan, R.C.Y., Reid, G., Irvin, R.T., Bruce, A.W. and Costerton, J.V. (1985) Competitive exclusion of uropathogens from human uroepithelial cells by Lactobacillus whole cells and cell wall fragments. Infection and Immunity 47, 8489.
  • Charteris, W.P., Kelly, P.M., Morelli, L. and Collins, J.K. (1998) Development and application of an ‘in vitro’ methodology to determine the transit tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in the upper human gastrointestinal tract. Journal of Applied Microbiology 84, 75968.
  • Chauviére, G., Coconnier, M.H., Kerneis, S., Fourniat, S. and Servin, A.L. (1992) Adhesion of human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB to human enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells. Journal of General Microbiology 138, 16891696.
  • Fogh, J., Fogh, J.M. and Orfeo, T. (1977) One hundred and twenty-seven cultured human tumor cell lines in nude mice. Journal of National Cancer Research 59, 221226.
  • Fuller, R. (1989) Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 66, 365378.
  • Gilliland, S.E. and Speck, M.L. (1977) Antagonistic action of Lactobacillus acidophilus toward intestinal and foodborne pathogens in associative cultures. Journal of Food Protection 40, 820823.
  • Greene, J.D. and Kleanhammer, T.D. (1994) Factors Involved in Adherence of lactobacilli to human Caco-2 cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 50, 44874494.
  • Havenaar, R. Ten Brink, B. and Huis In't Veld, J.H.J. (1992) Selection of strains for probiotic use. In: Probiotics. The Scientific Basis ed. Fuller, R. pp. 209224. London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Jacobsen, C.N., Rosenfeldt, N.V., Hayford, A.E., Moller, P.L., Michaelsen, K.F., Paerregaard, A., Sandströn, B., Tvede, M. and Jakobsen, M. (1999) Sceening of probiotic activities of forty-seven strains of Lactobacillus spp. by in vitro techniques and evaluation of the colonization ability of five selected strains in humans. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 49494956.
  • Jin, L.Z., Ho, Y.W., Abdullah, N., Ali, M.A. and Jalaludin, S. (1996) Antagonistic effects of intestinal Lactobacillus isolates on pathogens of chicken. Letters in Applied Microbiology 23, 6771.
  • Lee, Y.-K., and Salminen, S. (1995) The coming of age of probiotics. Trends in Food Science Technology 6, 241245.
  • Lee, Y.-K., Lim, C.Y., Teng, W.L., Ouwehand, A.C., Tuomola, E.M. and Salminen, S. (2000) Quantitative approach in the the study of adhesion of lactic acid bacteria to intestinal cells and their competition with enterobacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66, 36923697.
  • McGroarty, J.A. and Reid, G. (1988) Detection of Lactobacillus substance that inhibits Escherichia coli. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 34, 974978.
  • Owehand, A.C. (1998) Antimicrobial components from lactic acid bacteria. In: Lactic acid bacteria: Microbiology and functional aspects, eds. Salminen, S. and Von Wright, A. 2nd edn. pp. 139160. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.
  • Raibaud, P., Caulet, M., Galpin, J.V. and Moquot, G. (1961) Studies on the bacterial flora of the alimentary tract of pigs. II. Streptococci: selective enumeration and differentation of the dominant group. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 24, 285306.
  • Rolfe, D.R. (2000) The role of probiotic cultures in the control of gastrointestinal health. Journal of Nutrition 130, 396S402S.
  • Salminen, S., Isolauri, E. and Salminen, E. (1996a) Probiotics and stabilization of the gut mucosal barrier. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition 5, 5356.
  • Salminen, S., Isolauri, E. and Salminen, E. (1996b) Clinical uses of probiotics for stabilizing the gut mucosal barrier: successful strains and future challenges. Antoine van Leeuwenhoek 70, 347358.
  • Schilinger, U. and Lucke, F.K. (1989) Antibacterialactivity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 55, 19011906.
  • Spencer, R.J. and Chesson, A. (1990) The effect of Lactobacillus spp. on the attachment of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to isolate porcine enterocytes. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 77, 215220.
  • Velraeds, M.M.C., Van der Mei, H.C., Reid, G. and Busscher, J.H. (1996) Inhibition of initial adhesion of uropathogenis Enterococcus faecalis by biosurfactants from Lactobacillus isolated. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62, 19581963.
  • Zárate, G., Pérez Chaia, A., González, S. and Oliver, G. (2000) Viability and β-galactosidase activity of dairy propionibacteria subjected to digestion by artificial gastric and intestinal fluids. Journal of Food Protection 63, 12141221.