SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • 16S rDNA sequence analysis;
  • fish microbiota;
  • fluorescence in situ hybridization;
  • microbial diversity

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

Aims:  To identify the dominant culturable and nonculturable microbiota of rainbow trout intestine.

Methods and Results:  Microbial density of rainbow trout intestine was estimated by direct microscopic counts (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, DAPI) and by culturing on tryptone soya agar (TSA). Differential gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of bacterial DNA from intestinal samples, re-amplification of bands and sequence analysis was used to identify the bacteria that dominated samples where aerobic counts were ≤2% of the DAPI counts. 16S rDNA gene sequences of 146 bacterial isolates and three sequences of uncultured bacteria were identified. A set of oligonucleotide probes was constructed and used to detect and enumerate the bacterial community structure of the gastrointestinal tract of rainbow trout by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Members of the gamma subclass of Proteobacteria (mainly Aeromonas and Enterobacteriaceae) dominated the bacterial population structure. Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Shewanella, Plesiomonas and Proteus were also identified together with isolates belonging to the beta subclass of Proteobacteria and Gram-positive bacteria with high and low DNA G + C content. In most samples, the aerobic count (on TSA) was 50–90% of the direct (DAPI) count. A bacterium representing a previously unknown phylogenetic lineage with only 89% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to Anaerofilum pentosovorans was detected in intestinal samples where aerobic counts were ≤2% of direct (DAPI) counts. Ten to 75% of the microbial population in samples with low aerobic counts hybridized (FISH) with a probe constructed against this not-yet cultured bacterium.

Conclusions:  Proteobacteria belonging to the gamma subclass dominated the intestinal microbiota of rainbow trout. However, in some samples the microflora was dominated by uncultivated, presumed anaerobic, micro-organisms. The bacterial population structure of rainbow trout intestine, as well as total bacterial counts, varied from fish to fish.

Significance and Impact of the Study:  Good correlation was seen between cultivation results and in situ analysis, however, a molecular approach was crucial for the identification of organisms uncultivated on TSA.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

The indigenous microflora of fish, particularly the microbial ecology of the digestive tract, has been investigated by many researchers (Trust and Sparrow 1974; Horsley 1977; Austin and Al-Zahrani 1988; Munro et al. 1994; Ringøet al. 1995; Spanggaard et al. 2000). This is due to its assumed importance in digestion and disease control (Westerdahl et al. 1991; Austin et al. 1995; Bly et al. 1997). It is known, mainly from studies of the intestinal microflora of warm blooded animals, that the bacterial population structure of the intestine influences the establishment of pathogenic micro-organisms in the intestinal tract (Van der Waaij 1989; Singer and Nash 2000). The composition of the fish microflora and its dynamics has been investigated mostly by culture-dependent methods (Onarheim and Raa 1990; Ringøet al. 1995; Sugita et al. 1995) and identification of the fish microflora has typically relied on phenotypic and biochemical key characteristics (Cahill 1990). Recently, molecular techniques (Differential gradient gel electrophoresis, DGGE) were used to characterize the presumed dominating micro-organisms in haddock larvae (Griffith et al. 2001) and in farmed and wild salmon (Holben et al. 2002). However, a more thorough molecular and culturable characterization has, to our knowledge, not been performed on the microbial population of fish.

Within other ecological niches it has been shown that large subpopulations of micro-organisms exist that are not easily isolated and cultivated on traditional agar substrates (Van Elsas and van Overbeek 1993). The culturability of bacteria in water environments (seawater, freshwater and mesotrophic lake) is below 1% (Amann et al. 1995) and one study reported a culturability of micro-organisms from fish skin of <0·01% (Bernadsky and Rosenberg 1992).

Molecular methods based on the PCR, rDNA sequence analysis or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have reached a high level of acceptance in microbial ecology as techniques for identification and specific enumeration of bacteria unbiased by the limitations of culturability. Group-specific rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes offer means to rapidly assess those bacterial phylogenetic groups that are most abundant in a given sample. So far they have been successfully applied to various environmental samples such as activated sludge, marine picoplankton, biofilms, soil and the human intestine (Amann et al. 1995; Franks et al. 1998). Using 16S rRNA-targeted FISH, Amann et al. (1990) detected Fibrobacter intestinalis in the intestinal ecosystem of mice. Langendijk et al. (1995) applied quantitative FISH analysis to the human intestine for the detection of Bifidobacterium spp. with genus-specific oligonucleotide probes. With 16S rRNA probe hybridization using oligonucleotide probes specifically constructed for the environmental sample of interest, a high resolution in situ identification can be achieved. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA genes of total bacterial DNA from an environmental sample offers a visualization of the bacterial diversity as a DNA fingerprint. It gives the opportunity for subsequent identification and enumeration of community members by sequence analysis and in situ hybridization with probes specifically developed for the bacteria identified from the environment (Muyzer et al. 1993).

The present study on the microbial diversity of the gastrointestinal tract of rainbow trout is part of a larger study in which we evaluated the potential disease preventive effect of bacterial strains isolated from fish (Gram et al. 1999; Spanggaard et al. 2000, 2001). The work has focused on the dominant part of the microflora assuming that these organisms may play an important role in vivo. It is therefore crucial to our strategy that the dominant micro-organisms are isolated and characterized. In a previous study (Spanggaard et al. 2000) we found that, in general, the dominant bacterial microflora of rainbow trout intestine was culturable. In some fish, however, the bacteria dominating the intestinal microflora as visualized by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining could not be cultured by standard methods (Spanggaard et al. 2000).

The present study reports identification of the dominant culturable as well as nonculturable bacterial microflora of rainbow trout intestine detected by 16S rDNA sequencing and comparative sequence analysis. The retrieved 16SrDNA sequences were used for the construction of a set of group-specific oligonucleotide probes. These probes were subsequently applied by FISH analysis in conjunction with other group-specific probes to localize and enumerate the dominating bacterial population structure of rainbow trout intestine.

Sampling of rainbow trout

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

Rainbow trout were collected from three freshwater fish farms in Denmark (Table 4) and have been described elsewhere (Spanggaard et al. 2000). All fish were killed by a blow to the head and placed on ice and examined in the laboratory within 3 h. The intestinal contents were extracted by dissecting the fish, removing the intestine and squeezing out the contents for microbial analysis. All samples were weighed and homogenized for 1 min on Ultra Turrax T25, (Janke & Kunkel, IKA®-Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany) after addition of 2 ml phosphate-buffered saline (PBS: 130 mmol l−1 NaCl, 10 mmol l−1 NaH2PO4, pH 7·2).

Table 4.  Details on the fish analysed in this study. Data partly from Spanggaard et al. (2000)
Fish farm (sampling date)No. of fish* No. of isolates†No. of 16S rDNA sequences‡DAPI counts cells per gram (all fish)§Viable counts CFU per gram (all fish)¶No. of fish for FISH analysis**DAPI counts cells per gram (one fish)Viable counts CFU per gram (one fish)Culturability (%) (one fish)
  1. *Total number of fish examined per sampling point.

  2. †Total number of isolates purified and characterized by physiological criteria.

  3. Total number of 16S rDNA sequences retrieved from rainbow trout intestine.

  4. §Total bacterial cell count for all fish.

  5. ¶Bacterial bacterial plate counts on TSA agar.

  6. **Numbers of PFA-fixed fish intestines analysed in detail for microflora composition (DAPI, CFU, FISH).

1 (22 August 1997)6129421 × 105–2 × 1082 × 104–9 × 10711·8 × 1088·9 × 10749
2 (11 November 1997)8110139 × 103–2 × 1078 × 102–2 × 10611·8 × 1072·0 × 10611
3 (10 September 1997)6126765 × 103–1 × 1073 × 102–5 × 10611·0 × 1075·0 × 10650
3 (9 December 1997)22139152 × 105–7 × 1086 × 103–6 × 10811·6 × 1083·2 × 1062

Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

The samples were serially diluted in physiological saline and appropriate dilutions were spread on tryptone soya agar (TSA, Oxoid CM131). Bacterial colonies were isolated after incubation at 15°C for 7 days. A total of 504 isolates were pure cultured and identified (Spanggaard et al. 2000). A rapid tentative grouping of the isolates was performed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analyses of the isolates with the aim of reducing the number of bacterial strains for sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and phylogenetic identification (Spanggaard et al. 2000).

Identification by sequence data analysis

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

Bacterial pure cultures (146) representing different physiological groups and different RAPD-groups were selected for sequence analyses of the most variable region of the 16S rRNA gene. Almost complete 16S rRNA gene fragments corresponding to nucleotides 8-1541 of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA molecule were amplified in vitro (Springer et al. 1992) and excess primers and deoxynucleotide triphosphates were removed using MicroSpin S-400 HR Columns (Pharmacia Biotech, Inc., Uppasala, Sweden). Direct sequencing of the purified PCR products was performed using rDNA-specific primers (Springer et al. 1992). Cycle sequencing was carried out on both strands of the amplified 16S rDNA using the Thermo Sequenase fluorescent-labelled primer cycle sequencing kit (Amersham, Life Science, Hillerød, Denmark) according to the instructions of the manufacturer and were analysed on an automated DNA sequencer (A.L.F. express, Pharmacia Biotech).

Data analysis

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

Fifteen full and 131 partial 16S rDNA sequences of the isolates were added to an alignment of about 16 000 homologous full and partial primary structures using the respective automated tools of the ARB software package (Ludwig and Strunk 1997). The partial sequences (5′-end of the 16S rRNA molecule) were used for maximum parsimony analysis and a phylogenetic classification of the isolates. After adding the 16S rRNA gene sequences to the sequence database of the Technical University Munich, the ARB_EDIT tool of the ARB software package (Ludwig and Strunk 1997) was used for sequence alignment. The alignment was corrected manually. The 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic trees were based on the results of maximum parsimony analysis of all available 16S rRNA primary structures for bacteria. The topologies of the different trees were evaluated by performing maximum parsimony analysis of the full data set and subsets, respectively. The full sequences retrieved were also analysed for distance matrix criteria using the neighbour-joining treeing method. The phylogenetic positions of all organisms represented by partial sequences were roughly reconstructed by applying the parsimony criteria without changing the overall tree topology.

Oligonucleotide probes

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

Oligonucleotide probes complementary to 16S rRNA target sites of phylogenetic groups of bacterial isolates from the rainbow trout intestine were designed using the PROBE_DESIGN Tool of the ARB program package. The selected oligonucleotide target sites were tested for specificity against the 16S rRNA sequences available in the ARB program package using the PROBE_MATCH tool of the program. Fluorescein-, TAMRA- and CY3-labelled oligonucleotide probes were synthesized and purified by Hobolth DNA Syntese (Hillerød, Denmark). All probe sequences, their hybridization conditions and references are shown in Table 2. Hybridization conditions for the new oligonucleotide probes were optimized as described previously (Manz et al. 1992). Paraformaldehyde (PFA)-fixed bacterial pure cultures with one, two and three mismatches in the probe target region served as reference strains for testing the probes (Table 3). Probe stringency was adjusted by adding formamide to the hybridization buffer in concentrations ranging from 0 to 45% (v/v).

Table 2.  Oligonucleotide probes used for FISH analysis of rainbow trout intestinal microbiota
ProbeSpecificity Sequence (5′[RIGHTWARDS ARROW]3′) of probeTarget* site (rRNA positions)FA†in situ (%)Reference
  1. *Escherichia coli numbering (Brosius et al. 1981).

  2. †Percentage of (v/v) formamide in the in situ hybridization buffer.

EUB338-mixBacteriaGC(A/T)GCC(A/T)CCCGTAGG(A/T)GT16S (338–355)0–50Daims et al. (1999)
NON-EUB338Negative control for bacteriaACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGC16S (338–355)0–50Amann et al. (1990)
ALF968Alpha-ProteobacteriaGGTAAGGTTCTGCGCGTT16S (968–985)35Neef (1997)
BET42aBeta-ProteobacteriaGCCTTCCCACTTCGTTT23S (1024–1043)35Manz et al. (1992)
GAM42aGamma-ProteobacteriaGCCTTCCCACATCGTTT23S (1024–1043)35Manz et al. (1992)
CF319a/bCytophaga/FlavobacteriumTGGTCCGT(G/A)TCTCAGTAC16S (319–336)35Manz et al. (1996)
HGC69aHigh G + C-Gram-positiveTATAGTTACCACCGCCGT23S (1901–1918)25Roller et al. (1994)
LGC354a/b/cLow G + C-Gram-positive(T/C)G(C/G)AAGATTCCCTACTGC16S (354–371)25Meier et al. (1999)
ACA23aAcinetobacter spp.ATCCTCTCCCATACTCTA16S (652–669)35Wagner et al. (1994)
AER66Aeromonas spp.CTACTTTCCCGCTGCCGC16S (65–82)35Kämpfer et al. (1996)
ECO1531Enterobacteriaceae spp.CACCGTAGTGCCTCGTCATCA23S (1531–1551)35Poulsen et al. (1993)
ASA446Aeromonas salmonicidaAGGCGCCAACCTTTCCTC16S (446–463)35This study
VAN71Vibrio spp.GAACAAGTTCCTCTGTGC16S (71–88)0This study
YER445Yersinia ruckeriACACTTAACCCTTCCTCC16S (445–462)20This study
ACA432Acinetobacter spp.CCTCCTCGCTTAAAGTGC16S (432–449)35This study
AER642Aeromonas spp.AGACTCTAGCTGGACAGT16S (642–659)35This study
ASO642Aeromonas sobriaAGACTCTAGCTGAACAGT16S (642–659)35This study
ECO180Some EnterobacteriaceaeCTTTGGTCTTGCGACGTT16S (180–197)35This study
PSE224PseudomonadsCCGACCTAGGCTCATCTG16S (224–241)35This study
PAH64Pseudomonas spp.GCAAGCTTCTCTCTACCG16S (64–81)35This study
YER1251YersiniaTCGCGAGTTCGCTTCACT16S (1251–1268)45This study
CUR145Curtobacterium spp.GTTTCCAACGCTTATCCC16S (145–162)25This study
CAR193Carnobacterium spp.AGCCACCTTTCCTTCAAG16S (193–210)25This study
UNK712Carnobacterium sp. (DFI 3)GTTATCCGCCACAATTCC16S (712–729)0This study
UNK730Unidentified intestinal bacterium (DFI 1)TAGAGCCCAGTAAACCGC16S (730–748)0This study
UNK835Clostridium sp. (DFI 2)CGGAAGTCATGACAACTC16S (835–853)0This study
Table 3.  Specificity of the probes developed in this study
GroupProbeTarget*Target organisms tested by FISH†Negative controls tested by FISH‡
Species/strainsBase pair mismatchConditions§ (% FA)
  1. *Target group.

  2. †Target organisms tested by whole-cell hybridization as positive controls for probe stringency.

  3. ‡Nontarget organisms tested by whole-cell hybridization as negative controls.

  4. §Base pair mismatches of the closest 16S rRNA sequence determined theoretically from the ARB database.

  5. ¶Isolates from rainbow trout intestine identified by 16S rDNA sequencing.

  6. ND: not determined by FISH.

AcinteobacterACA432Acinetobacter spp.Isolates of Acinetobacter spp.¶Yerisina ruckeri135
   (A17, A75, A109, T41, T42)Erwinia carotovora  
   Aeromonas salmonicida  
AeromonasAER642Aeromonas spp.A. salmonicida, A. hydrophilaRahnella aquatilis235
   56 isolates of Aeromonas spp.¶Yersinia ruckeri  
   Citrobacter freundii3 
ASA446A. salmonicidaIsolates of A. salmonicidaIsolates of Aeromonas spp.¶235
   (A24, A34, A38, A47, A50, A59, A74, A83, A120, T114) (A16, A32, B112), A. hydrophila  
ASO642A. sobriaIsolates of A. sobriaA. hydrophila, A. salmonicida135
   (A16, A97)A. trota2 
EnterobacteriaceaeECO180EnterobacteriaceaeE. coli isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (A28, T25, T116, T120)Sphingomonas adhaesiva235
YER445Yersinia ruckeriY. ruckeriRahnella aquatilis120
YER1251YersiniaY. ruckeriRahnella aquatilis145
PseudomonasPSE224PseudomonadsPs. fluorescens AH2Acinetobacter junii235
  (rRNA group 1)isolates of Pseudomonads¶isolates of Acinetobacter spp.¶  
   (A73, A76) (A17, A20, A86, A87)  
PAH64Ps. fluorescens AH2Ps. fluorescens AH2Gill isolate of Pseudomonads¶ (B128)235
 Ps. aureofaciensPs. aureofaciens   
 P. viridiflava    
VibrioVAN71V. anguillarumV. anguillarumC. freundii20
 V. ordali, V. mimicus    
 V. cholerae    
CurtobacteriumCUR145C. citreumIsolate of Curtobacterium¶ (B85)Cellulomonas flavigena125
 C. luteum    
CarnobacteriumCAR193C. piscicolaIsolates of Carnobacterium¶ (D35, D73)ND325
 C. gallinarum    
 L. maltaromicus    

Total cell counts by DAPI staining

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

The intestinal samples were fixed in ethanol/PBS (1 : 1) and stained with DAPI (Sigma D 9542; 1 μg ml−1) for 20 min in the dark, filtered on polycarbonate filters (diameter 25 mm, pore size 0·2 μm, type GTTP; Millipore, Glostrup, Denmark) and placed on nitrocellulose support filters (25 mm, 0·45 μm; Sartorius, Roskilde, Denmark). Excess DAPI solution was removed, the filters air-dried and immersed in Citifluor (Citifluor Ltd, London, UK). Cell numbers were determined by counting with a grid ocular. Epifluorescence microscopy at ×1000 magnification was performed with a Zeiss Axioskop 20 (Brock & Michelsen, Birkerød, Denmark) using a Chroma filterset (F41-000).

Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

Specificity and stringency of the designed oligonucleotide probes were tested on pure bacterial cultures by whole-cell hybridization. All strains were grown overnight in TSB at room temperature and fixed in 3% PFA (Amann et al. 1990). The whole-cell hybridization with PFA-fixed bacterial strains as positive and negative controls (Table 3) was performed as described by Manz et al. (1992). For probe testing the virulent strains of the fish pathogens Vibrio anguillarum [strain 90-11-287, serotype 01 (Skov et al. 1995)], Yersinia ruckeri (7/97; Biomar A/S, Brande, Denmark) and Aeromonas salmonicida (970618-1/1, Dr I. Dalsgaard, RVAU, Copenhagen, Denmark) as well as the Pseudomonas fluorescens strain AH2 with inhibitory effect towards fish pathogens (Gram et al. 1990) were used. All other bacterial reference strains were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and the German Type Culture Collection (DSMZ, Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen, Braunschweig). The strains Acinetobacter junii (ATCC 17908T), Aeromonas eucrenophila (ATCC 7966T), Aeromonas hydrophila (ATCC 7966T), Aeromonas trota (ATCC 49657T), Cellulomonas flavigena (DSM 20109), Citrobacter freundii (ATCC 29935), Erwinia carotovora (ATCC 15713T), E. coli K-12 (DSM 30083T), Ps. aeruginosa (DSM 20109), Ps. aureofaciens (DSM 6698T) and Rahnella aquatilis (ATCC 33989) were used.

FISH and probe specific cell counts

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

Intestinal samples were fixed with 3% PFA and immobilized on glass slides. FISH analysis of the intestinal microflora of rainbow trout was performed by applying general group-specific oligonucleotide probes and oligonucleotide probes specifically constructed for this study. The hybridization conditions are described by Manz et al. (1992). Micrographs were taken with a Zeiss Axioskop 20 epifluorescence microscope using Chroma HQ-FITC (F41-001) and HQ-CY3 (F41-007) high quality filtersets as well as using a LSM 510 scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with an Argon laser (450–514 nm) and a He-Ne laser (543 nm).

DGGE analysis

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

The DNA extracted from fish intestine was used for PCR amplification by applying the primer combination GM5F (E. coli position 341 of the 16SrDNA, with GC-clamp) and 907R (E. coli position 907 of the 16SrDNA). A 550-bp fragment of the 16S rDNA was amplified, suitable for subsequent DGGE analysis. PCR amplifications were performed as described earlier (Casamayor et al. 2000) using a hot-start and touchdown annealing reaction to increase the specificity of the amplification. DGGE was performed with a Bio-Rad DCodeTM system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). About 400 ng of PCR product were deposited in each well of the DGGE gel. The urea/formamide gradient of the gel ranged from 20 to 80%. Electrophoresis was performed for 5.5 h at a constant voltage of 200 V at 60°C. After electrophoresis the gels were stained in aqueous SYBR-Green I solution (10 000× diluted) and photographed on a u.v. (302 nm) transillumination table with a polaroid camera. Selected DGGE bands were excised from the DGGE gel, eluted, and reamplified with the same primers but without GC-clamp. Purification and sequencing of the purified PCR products were carried out as described above.

Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

Fifteen bacterial isolates representing the major RAPD groups were fully sequenced and 131 isolates were partially sequenced at the most variable 5′-end of the 16S rRNA gene representing the dominant RAPD groups (Spanggaard et al. 2000). Most of the isolates could be identified to genus level (95% sequence similarity, Stackebrandt and Goebel 1994), but some only to family or subclass level (Table 1). The bacteria isolated from rainbow trout intestine were mainly Proteobacteria of the gamma subclass, but Proteobacteria of the beta subclass, Flavobacteria and Gram-positive bacteria with low and high DNA G + C-content were also identified.

Table 1.  Sequence analysis and whole-cell hybridization results of bacterial strains isolated from TSA plates from fish farms 1, 2 and 3
Fish farmNo. of isolatesPhylogenetic groupIsolate codeLength of sequence (bp)Whole-cell hybridization to specific probes testedAccession no. (GenBank)
1 22 August 19971EnterobacteriaceaeT11491EUB338, GAM42a, ECO180AY374104
1 T921485EUB338, GAM42a, ECO180AY374105
29  293–692EUB338, GAM42a, ECO180 
1ProteusT1151484EUB338, GAM42aAY374106
1Plesiomonas 470EUB338, GAM42a 
5Acinetobacter 446–472EUB338, GAM42a, ACA432 
4Aeromonas 381–474EUB338, GAM42a, AER642 
Total42     
2 11 November 19971Beta-subclass of ProteobacteriaB1151473EUB338, BET42aAY374111
1 B21482EUB338, BET42aAY374107
3  466–477EUB338, BET42a 
5Aeromonas 285–481EUB338, GAM42a, AER642 
1FlavobacteriumB761377EUB338, CF319a/bAY374109
1CurtobacteriumB851408EUB338, HGC69a, CUR145AY374110
1StaphylococcusB291490EUB338, LGC354a/b/cAY374108
Total13     
3 10 September 19971AeromonasA971503EUB338, GAM42a, AER642AY374113
45  206–707EUB338, GAM42a, AER642 
9Shewanella 196–666EUB338, GAM42a, 
1AcinetobacterA751494EUB338, GAM42a, ACA432AY374112
13  370–731EUB338, GAM42a, ACA432 
2Enterobacteriaceae 286–473EUB338, GAM42a, ECO180 
1Plesiomonas 206EUB338, GAM42a 
2Pseudomonas (rRNA group 1) 464–467EUB338, GAM42a, PSE224 
1ArthrobacterA1051481EUB338, HGC69aAY374114
1RhodococcusA1101345EUB338, HGC69aAY374115
Total76     
3 9 December 19971EnterobacteriaceaeD2111496EUB338, GAM42a, ECO180AY374118
4  410–477EUB338, GAM42a, ECO180 
2Shewanella 424–480EUB338, GAM42a, 
1ProteusD221488EUB338, GAM42aAY374116
1Aeromonas 443EUB338, GAM42a, AER642 
1Pseudomonas (rRNA group 1) 412EUB338, GAM42a, PSE224 
1CarnobacteriumD351499EUB338, LGC354a/b/c, CAR193AY374117
4  468–760EUB338, LGC354a/b/c, CAR193 
Total15     

16S rDNA sequencing of 42 isolates from fish farm 1 showed that Enterobacteriaceae dominated the cultured flora (86%). Two full and 29 partial sequences of Enterobacteriaceae were determined. Other bacterial isolates were identified as Plesiomonas, Proteus, Acinetobacter and Aeromonas (Table 2). From fish farm 2 (11 November 1997) 13 bacterial isolates were identified by 16S rDNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. By molecular identification (RAPD-analyses and whole-cell hybridization with the probe BET42a) 61% of the cultured bacteria were characterized as members of the beta subclass of Proteobacteria. These isolates were grouped into two phylogenetic groups, one closely related to Duganella zoogloeides, with 98% sequence similarity, and the other to Iodobacter fluviatile as the closest related bacterial pure culture with 93% sequence similarity (Fig. 1). The gamma subclass of Proteobacteria isolates were identified as heterogeneous aeromonads and the Gram-positive bacteria as members of the Staphylococcus and Curtobacterium. Flavobacterium was also identified by 16S rDNA sequencing (Table 1). From fish farm 3 (10 September 1997), 76 bacterial strains were sequenced and the population was dominated by heterogeneous aeromonads (71%) (Table 4). Enterobacteriaceae, Shewanella, Acinetobacter, Plesiomonas, Pseudomonas, Arthrobacter and Rhodococcus were also identified. At a later sampling at fish farm 3 on 9 December 1997, the cultured microflora was dominated by Enterobacteriaceae (54%) as well as by Carnobacterium (33%). Four Carnobacterium, five isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and more representatives of the gamma subclass of Proteobacteria (isolates of the genera Shewanella, Proteus, Aeromonas and Pseudomonas) were identified (Table 1). However, the microscopic analysis of the fish intestines, and also the low culturability rate of 0·1–2%, indicated that the dominant part of the microflora from this sampling was not cultured.

image

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rDNA sequences showing the relationships of the isolates from rainbow trout intestine with their closest relatives among the beta subclass of Proteobacteria. The phylogenetic positions of the isolates were reconstructed by applying the parsimony criteria without changing the overall tree topology. The numbers in brackets behind the 16S rRNA primary structures retrieved from the database are accession numbers. The numbers in brackets behind each sequence from rainbow trout intestine (indicated in bold typeface) show the length of the sequence analysed. The numbers in the boxes indicate the number of sequences grouped. The bar indicates 10% estimated sequence divergence

Download figure to PowerPoint

Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

An alignment of 16S rRNA sequences using the ARB ribosomal RNA database containing all 146 sequences of identified isolates was used for the construction of nine specific oligonucleotide probes for the microflora of rainbow trout intestine (Table 2). Because of the close phylogenetic relationship between the fish intestine isolates, most of the probes for the 16S rDNA sequences were designed to be group-specific and tested against species/strains from culture collections and against isolates from rainbow trout intestine (Table 3). In addition, three probes (YER445, ASA446 and VAN71) were developed for the important fish pathogens Yersinia ruckeri, Aeromonas salmonicida and Vibrio anguillarum.

The probes designed for Acinetobacter (ACA432), Aeromonas sobria (ASO642), Yersinia ruckerii (YER445), Yersinia spp. (YER1251 and Curtobacterium (CUR145) did not detect representatives of the bacterial species with only one base pair mismatch (using 20–45% formamide) (Table 3). The probes ACA432 and ASO642 hybridized with fish intestinal strains identified by 16S rDNA sequencing as Acinetobacter and A. sobria, respectively.

The probe ECO180 detected Enterobacteriaceae, including rainbow trout isolates identified as Citrobacter and Enterobacter. The PROBE_MATCH tool of the ARB program showed single strains existing within the family Enterobacteriaceae that could not be detected by the probe, indicating that this probe cannot detect the whole family of the Enterobacteriaceae. The probe AER642 detected the whole genus Aeromonas and hybridized (by whole-cell hybridization) with all 56 isolates identified by 16S rDNA sequencing as Aeromonas (Tables 3 and 4). Representatives of Rahnella aquatilis and Yersinia ruckeri with two mismatches in the probe target region of AER642 were not detected when 35% formamide was used. No bacterial strain with only one mismatch in the probe target region is known. All 10 isolates identified as A. salmonicida by 16S rRNA gene sequencing were detected by the probe ASA446 in whole-cell hybridization experiments, whereas strains with two mismatches were not detected. Twenty-four Aeromonas isolates of rainbow trout intestine could be identified as A. sobria with the probe ASO642.

The probe PSE224 designed for rRNA group 1 pseudomonads hybridized with fish isolates and did not detect bacterial isolates (Acinetobacter) with two mismatches in the probe target region. Under stringent conditions the probe PAH64 developed for the detection of the probiotic strain Ps. fluorescens AH2, also detected P. viridiflava and Ps. aureofaciens. It was not possible to construct a 16S rRNA-targeted probe specific for the strain P. fluorescens AH2 alone because of the close relationship within the bacterial genus Pseudomonas. The probe VAN71, which was constructed specifically for Vibrio anguillarum, did not detect bacterial strains with two mismatches in the probe target region, but did, even under stringent hybridization conditions, also detect the species V. ordalii, V. mimicus and V. cholerae.

The probe CAR193 was specific for the genus Carnobacterium including the species Lactobacillus maltaromicus. All isolates of rainbow trout intestine that were identified as Carnobacterium were detected by the probe. The probe was not tested against bacterial negative controls, but no known bacterium (corresponding to the ARB database of ca 16 000 16S rRNA sequences) showed fewer than three mismatches in the probe target region. The probe was used with 25% formamide in the hybridization buffer and the signal disappeared if higher formamide concentrations were applied in whole-cell hybridization experiments.

Culturability

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

As described in Spanggaard et al. (2000), the counts of the intestinal microflora varied by 3–5 log units between fish within the same sampling point (Table 4) and, in general, high culturability (11–50%) was found. At fish farm 3, several samples contained high counts of noncultured bacteria (Spanggaard et al. 2000). One fish intestine contained 98% of not culturable bacteria (clusters of small coccoid bacteria) and was selected for further analysis. Subsequently, these coccoid bacteria were also identified in other fish at this sampling point (9 December 1997).

Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

Three DGGE bands could be detected in all intestinal samples of the sampling point 9 December 1997 from fish farm 3. These were excised, re-amplified and sequenced (Fig. 2). By phylogenetic analysis, the first band sequence was identified as belonging to the Carnobacteria with 98% sequence similarity to Carnobacterium piscicola (DFI 3), the second band belonged to the Clostridia with 95% sequence similarity to Clostridium botulinum (DFI 2). The third sequence did not belong to any well-known phylogenetic lineage (DFI 1). The closest related bacterial pure culture was Anaerofilum pentosovorans with 89% sequence similarity of the 16S rRNA (Fig. 3).

image

Figure 2. Negative image of an SYBR Green I-stained DGGE gel containing PCR amplified segments of bacterial 16S rRNA genes retrieved from three fish of fish farm 3 (9 December 1997). The three dominant bands of each profile have been excised from the DGGE gel, reamplified, sequenced and were phylogenetically placed using the ARB program

Download figure to PowerPoint

image

Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of the three organisms represented by the sequenced bands retrieved from the DGGE gel to their closest relatives among the domain bacteria. The phylogenetic positions were reconstructed by applying the parsimony criteria without changing the overall tree topology. The three sequences from rainbow trout intestine are indicated in bold typeface. The bar indicates 10% estimated sequence divergence

Download figure to PowerPoint

Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

Three specific oligonucleotide probes were constructed for the recovered sequences from the DGGE fingerprints of rainbow trout intestine from fish farm 3 (9 December 1997). The probes labelled with CY3 were applied to PFA-fixed intestinal samples of the same sampling point. The probe UNK730 constructed for the sequence DFI 1 could specifically detect the clusters of small coccoid bacteria (Fig. 4). By in situ hybridization of rainbow trout intestines, no bacteria could be detected with the probes UNK712, constructed for the sequence DFI 3 with 98% sequence similarity to Carnobacterium piscicola, and UNK835, constructed for the sequence DFI 2 with 95% similarity to Clostridium botulinum. The probes were applied without adding formamide to the hybridization buffer. They were not tested with bacterial pure cultures as positive controls in whole-cell hybridization experiments as the probes detected uncultured bacteria. The probe UNK730 was subsequently applied to nine fish samples from fish farm 3 where DAPI counts were 2–3 log units higher than the culturable counts (Spanggaard et al. 2000). In five of nine samples, cells hybridizing to UNK730 were found in high concentrations whereas such cells were found on lower amounts in four samples. The UNK730 hybridized to 10–100% of the cells in a microcopic view field.

image

Figure 4. (a) Fluorescence overlay of two confocal laser scanning microscopic images showing the dominant bacterial flora of rainbow trout of fish farm 3 (9 December 1997) after in situ hybridization with fluorescently labelled oligonucleotide probes. The clusters of small coccoid bacteria were identified by simultaneous hybridization to the fluorescein-labelled probe EUB338-mix and the CY3-labelled probe UNK730 that was specifically developed for a 16S rDNA sequence retrieved from the DGGE gel (DFI 1), representing an organism that shows 89% sequence similarity to Anaerofilum pentosovorans. All cells are detected by both probes (yellow). (b) Phase contrast micrograph showing the identical microscopic field. Bar = 10 μm

Download figure to PowerPoint

In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

One fish of each fish farm and sampling point was assessed for a high resolution FISH analysis of the microbial composition of the intestine. This approach is limited by the number of bacteria present per microscopic field and a detailed in situ analysis was only carried out on the fish with highest bacterial counts in the intestine, varying from 1 × 107 to 7 × 108. Bacterial numbers were analysed using general group-specific probes and all probes constructed in this study (Table 2). The intestinal microflora was quantified by microscopic counting using individual probes compared with total bacterial counts with the probe EUB338-mix detecting all bacteria in the sample (Fig. 5). For the fish analysed by in situ hybridization in detail the DAPI : EUB338-mix ratio was also determined. The specific probes revealed that each fish carried its own predominant bacterial population (Fig. 5).

image

Figure 5. Comparison of the bacterial community structure of one fish of all four sampling points determined by FISH analysis with all probes listed in Table 2. The intestinal microflora was quantified by microscopic counting. The percentage of individual bacterial populations (% on top of the bar depicting the probe used for the analysis) relative to the total number of bacteria as determined with the probe EUB338-mix is shown. The major phylogenetic groups are shown with full bars and subgroups with hatched bars. For details on the FISH analysed see Table 1. Only bacterial populations that were detected by microscopic counting are indicated

Download figure to PowerPoint

Enterobacteriaceae (ECO180) dominated the intestinal microflora of the fish from fish farm 1 (22 August 1997) with total bacterial counts of 1.8 × 108 (Figs 5 and 6a,b). Bacteria belonging to the genera Aeromonas (AER642) and Acinetobacter (ACA432) and low G + C Gram-positive bacteria could be detected in lower numbers. About 85% of all bacteria were detected by FISH analysis and 89% of the total cell count (DAPI) was detected by the bacterial probe EUB338-mix. In the fish investigated from fish farm 2 (11 November 1997), with total bacterial counts of 1·8 × 107, Proteobacteria belonging to the beta and gamma subclass dominated (Figs 5 and 6c,d). The gamma-Proteobacteria were dominated by Aeromonas (AER642). Acinetobacter (ACA432) and Pseudomonas (PSE224) were detected in situ but had not been isolated on TSA. Twelve per cent of the flora were Gram-positive bacteria and were detected by LGC354a/b/c (10%) and HGC69a (2%). About 84% of all bacteria (EUB338-mix) were detected by FISH analysis and 83% of the total cell count (DAPI) were detected by the bacterial probe EUB338-mix. From fish farm 3 the intestinal contents of two fish of two different sampling points were analysed. One fish with a total of 1 × 107 bacteria in the intestine, from 10 September 1997, was dominated by representatives of the genus Aeromonas (AER642, Fig. 6e,f), while the fish with total bacterial counts of 1·6 × 108 from 9 December 1997 was dominated by clusters of very small coccoid bacteria (UNK730, Fig. 4a,b), which could not be cultured (72% of the bacterial flora). Twelve per cent of the microflora was identified as belonging to the Gram-positive bacteria with low DNA G + C content. About 80 and 84% of the bacterial flora were detected by the oligonucleotide probes applied, respectively. The DAPI : EUB338-mix ratio was 86% on 10 September 1997 on 97% on 9 December 1997.

image

Figure 6. Micrographs of the indigenous microflora of one fish of each investigated fish farm after in situ hybridization with fluorescently labelled oligonucleotide probes. Epifluorescence micrographs (left) and phase contrast images (right) are shown for identical microscopic fields. (a) In situ hybridization with the probe ECO180 (TAMRA labelled, red) detecting members of the Enterobacteriaceae in one fish of fish farm 1 (22 August 1997). The autofluorescing intestinal background appears yellow. (c) Simultaneous in situ hybridization with the probes GAM42a (fluorescein labelled, green), detecting the gamma subclass of Proteobacteria, and Bet42a (TAMRA labelled, red), detecting the beta subclass of Proteobacteria, in one fish of fish farm 2 (11 November 1997). (e) Simultaneous in situ hybridization with the probe EUB338-mix (fluorescein labelled, green), detecting all bacteria, and the probe AER642 (TAMRA labelled, red), detecting members of the genus Aeromonas in one fish of fish farm 3 (10 September 1997). All cells detected by both probes appear yellow, those bacteria that only hybridize to the probe EUB338-mix appear green

Download figure to PowerPoint

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References

The use of molecular methods, and in particular the 16S rRNA approach for microbial communities, has previously provided insight into the diversity and population dynamics of bacterial communities in different habitats including seawater (Giovannoni et al. 1990), activated sludge (Wagner et al. 1993), the rumen (Stahl et al. 1988), termite intestines (Ohkuma and Kudo 1996) and soil (Liesack and Stackebrandt 1992). In the present study, we performed a molecular analysis for cultivation-independent identification of the dominant microflora. Although complete 16S rDNA sequences should be used for phylogenetic reconstruction (Ludwig and Strunk 1997), partial sequences of the most variable part of the 16S rRNA gene were, in our study, sufficient to determine the closest relatives for unknown sequences and to assign them to well-established phylogenetic groups (Muyzer et al. 1995; Stackebrandt and Rainey 1995).

In Arctic charr some micro-organisms appear to be associated with the gut wall (Ringøet al. 2001a), but in rainbow trout electron microscopy studies (Austin and Al-Zahrani 1988) and direct FISH analysis (I. Huber, unpublished data) point to a general lack of colonization of the gut wall, with the vast majority of the organisms residing in the lumen. We therefore believe that our data (based on the squeezed intestinal contents) reflects the microbial population of the gastrointestinal tract of trout.

For many ecosystems it has been shown that only a fraction of the total number of bacteria present in the sample can be cultured (Amann et al. 1995; Berg 1996) or that cultivation-based identification can be biased because of media selectivity (Wagner et al. 1994; Amann et al. 1995). However, we typically found high culturability rates and, in general, good agreement was seen between direct in situ identification and flora composition as based on the culturable flora.

Although culturability rates were relatively high (11–50%), our data also indicate that some organisms in the trout intestine have not yet been cultured. Thus FISH analysis demonstrated that 20% of the total cell counts (DAPI) were not detected by the bacteria-specific probe EUB338-mix. These cells could either be nonbacterial or be cells that have not been permeabilized by the applied conditions for FISH.

In samples where cultivation rates were only 0·1–2%, a direct amplification followed by DGGE analysis and sequencing allowed us to identify the uncultured clusters of cocci bacteria as a new bacterial phylogenetic lineage with 89% sequence similarity to Anaerofilum pentosovorans. This new microbial population detected in the sample reflected the strongest band in the DGGE gel. FISH analysis confirmed the dominance of this microbial population in rainbow trout intestine in several samples with low culturability rates. The other two sequences identified were members of the genera Clostridium and Carnobacterium both of which have been identified from fish intestine (Sugita et al. 1997; Ringøet al. 2001b). The specific probes constructed for these two bacterial populations did not detect bacterial cells in situ which could either be due to malfunctioning probes or to a significantly lower proportion than that of the dominant cocci clusters. Working with mixtures of pure cultures, Muyzer et al. (1993) found that DGGE analysis enabled detection of populations with an abundance of <1% of the total cell count. As it is assumed that the primers used for PCR amplification are general for bacteria, DGGE fingerprints should not be biased towards known bacterial groups, as they rely on direct rRNA gene retrieval from environmental DNA. However, biases in this molecular approach may occur in the efficiency of cell lysis (Picard et al. 1992), DNA extraction and purification (Liesack et al. 1991) as well as during PCR amplification (Reysenbach et al. 1992). Therefore it cannot be expected that the full species richness of total microbial diversity in a complex habitat can be estimated with this method. Strictly anaerobic bacteria were not investigated in our study, but have previously been isolated from fish gut (Sakata et al. 1980b; Austin and Al-Zahrani 1988). Ringøet al. (1995) have previously suggested that the predominant bacteria isolated from the salmonid gut are aerobes or facultative anaerobes.

It has been suggested that the microbial flora of fish intestine consists of bacteria that are also present in the surrounding water, but which are able to persist and multiply in the environment provided by the intestinal tract (Sugita et al. 1988; Cahill 1990). In agreement with this, both the cultivation approach and the direct molecular FISH approach demonstrated that Proteobacteria of the gamma subclass dominated the microflora. Fermentative bacteria of the Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae and Aeromonodaceae are fast growing organisms that are likely to thrive in the fish gastrointestinal tract with its conditions of low pH, lack of oxygen and ample nutrients. It has previously been described that faecal streptococci and coliforms can enter fish farms via incoming water and feed, and have the potential to multiply in the fish intestine (Cahill 1990). One group of isolates within the beta-Proteobacteria could not be identified to genus level. This group showed 93% 16S rRNA sequence similarity to Iodobacter fluviatile. Closely related bacterial isolates (more than 99% 16S rDNA sequence similarity) were identified on the skin of fish from the same fish farm at different sampling points (results not shown), indicating that this group of isolates represents bacteria from the surrounding water that were established on the outer surfaces of the fish.

Rearing conditions of the fish and seasonal changes (e.g. temperature) may influence fish microflora (Cahill 1990). Our results support these findings for the rainbow trout intestine as the fish of every sampling point had a specific predominant intestinal microflora. Large animal-to-animal variations in the population sizes of the dominant bacteria have been found in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs by the use of culturing methods (Robinson et al. 1984). High variations in bacterial counts between individuals have also been reported for fish (Trust and Sparrow 1974; Yoshimizu and Kimura 1976; Sakata et al. 1980a) and were confirmed by our results.

In conclusion, the combination of bacterial isolation, DGGE analysis, 16S rDNA sequencing and subsequent FISH analysis with oligonucleotide probes specifically developed for the set of rRNA sequences retrieved proved to be a powerful tool for detailed insight into the microbial diversity of rainbow trout intestine. A high bacterial diversity was found in the gut, although the fish intestine seemed to have a predominant bacterial flora at each sampling point. Molecular tools proved essential to answer the many questions concerning the composition, structure and stability of this microbial ecosystem. We showed that molecular methods can be applied for a detailed analysis of the microbial community structure of fish intestine. Future studies should use the molecular approach described to determine the stability of the microflora of individual fish over time as dependent on feeding, season and antibiotic administration. Such studies will be crucial in determining whether the microflora is established in the fish gut or whether it is indeed transient, representing the flora of the surrounding water.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Sampling of rainbow trout
  6. Isolation and characterization by traditional techniques
  7. Identification by sequence data analysis
  8. Data analysis
  9. Oligonucleotide probes
  10. Total cell counts by DAPI staining
  11. Bacterial strains and whole-cell hybridization
  12. FISH and probe specific cell counts
  13. DNA-extraction from the fish intestine
  14. DGGE analysis
  15. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
  16. Results
  17. Identification of bacterial isolates from fish gut by 16S rDNA sequence analysis and phylogenetic analysis
  18. Specific probes constructed for the microflora of rainbow trout
  19. Culturability
  20. Identification of the uncultured bacterial microflora of the rainbow trout intestine by DGGE fingerprinting and phylogenetic affiliation
  21. Oligonucleotide probes for the identification of the yet uncultured intestinal microflora
  22. In situ analysis of rainbow trout intestine with oligonucleotide probes
  23. Discussion
  24. Acknowledgements
  25. References
  • Amann, R.I., Krumholz, L. and Stahl, D.A. (1990) Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative phylogenetic and environmental studies in microbiology. Journal of Bacteriology 172, 762770.
  • Amann, R.I., Ludwig, W. and Schleifer, K.H. (1995) Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiological Reviews 59, 143169.
  • Austin, B. and Al-Zahrani, A.M.J. (1988) The effect of antimicrobial compounds on the gastrointestinal microflora of rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson. Journal of Fish Biology 33, 114.
  • Austin, B., Stuckey, L.F., Robertson, P.A.W., Effendi, I. and Griffith, D.R.W. (1995) A probiotic strain of Vibrio alginolyticus effective in reducing diseases caused by Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio anguillarum and Vibrio ordalii. Journal of Fish Diseases 18, 9396.
  • Berg, R.D. (1996) The indigenous gastrointestinal microflora. Trends in Microbiology 4, 430435.
  • Bernadsky, G. and Rosenberg, E. (1992) Drag-reducing properties of bacteria from the skin mucus of the cornetfish (Fistularia commersonii). Microbial Ecology 24, 6374.
  • Bly, J.E., Quiniou, S.M.A., Lawson, L.A. and Clem, L.W. (1997) Inhibition of Saprolegnia pathogenic for fish by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Journal of Fish Diseases 20, 3540.
  • Brosius, J., Dull, T.J., Sleeter, D.D. and Noller, H.F. (1981) Gene organization and primary structure of a ribosomal RNA operon from Escherichia coli. Journal of Molecular Biology 148, 107127.
  • Cahill, M.M. (1990) Bacterial flora of fishes: a review. Microbial Ecology 19, 2141.
  • Casamayor, E., Schäfer, H., Bañeras, L., Pedrós-Alió, C. and Muyzer, G. (2000) Identification of spatio-temporal differences between microbial assemblages from two neighboring sulfurous lakes: comparison by microscopy and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66, 499508.
  • Daims, H., Bruhl, A., Amann, R.I., Schleifer, K.H. and Wagner, M. (1999). The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 22, 434444.
  • Franks, A.H., Harmsen, H.J.M., Raangs, G.C., Jansen, G.J., Schut, F. and Welling, G.W. (1998) Variations of bacterial populations in human feces measured by fluorescent in situ hybridization with group-specific 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 64, 33363345.
  • Giovannoni, S., Britschgi, T.B., Moyer, C.L. and Field, K.G. (1990) Genetic diversity in Sargasso Sea bacterioplankton. Nature 345, 6063.
  • Gram, L., Wedell-Neergaard, C. and Huss, H. (1990) The bacteriology of fresh and spoiling Lake Victorian Nile perch (Lates niloticus). International Journal of Food Microbiology 10, 303316.
  • Gram, L., Melchiorsen, J., Spanggaard, B., Huber, I. and Nielsen, T.F. (1999) Inhibition of Vibrio anguillarum by Pseudomonas fluorescens AH2, a possible probiotic treatment of fish. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 969973.
  • Griffith, S., Melville, K., Cook, M., Vincent, S., St. Pierre, M. and Lanteigne, C. (2001) Profiling of bacterial species associated with haddock larviculture by PCR amplification of 16S rDNA and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 13, 355363.
  • Holben, W.E., Williams, P., Saarinen, M., Särkilahti, L.K. and Apajalahti, J.H.A. (2002) Phylogenetic analysis of intestinal microflora indicates a novel mycoplasma phylotype in farmed and wild salmon. Microbial Ecology 44, 175185.
  • Horsley, R.W. (1977) A review of the bacterial flora of teleosts and elasmobranchs, including methods for its analysis. Journal of Fish Biology 10, 529553.
  • Kämpfer, P., Erhart, R., Beimfohr, C., Böhringer, M., Wagner, R. and Amann, R.I. (1996) Characterization of bacterial communities from activated sludge: culture-dependent numerical identification versus in situ identification using group- and genus-specific rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. Microbial Ecology 32, 101121.
  • Langendijk, P.S., Schut, F., Jansen, G.J., Raangs, G.C., Kamphuis, G.R., Wilkinson, M.H.F. and Welling, G.W. (1995) Quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization of Bifidobacterium spp. with genus-specific 16S rRNA-targeted probes and its application in fecal samples. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 30693075.
  • Liesack W. and Stackebrandt, E. (1992) Occurence of novel groups of the domain bacteria as revealed by analysis of the genetic material isolated from an Australian terrestrial environment. Journal of Bacteriology 174, 50725078.
  • Liesack, W., Weyland, H. and Stackebrandt, E. (1991) Potential risks of gene amplification by PCR as determined by 16S rDNA analysis of a mixed-culture of strict barophilic bacteria. Microbial Ecology 21, 191198.
  • Ludwig, W. and Strunk, O. (1997) ARB: a software environment for sequence data (http://www.mikro.biologie.tu-muenchen.de/pub/ARB/documentation/arb.ps).
  • Manz, W., Amann, R.I., Ludwig, W., Wagner, M. and Schleifer, K.H. (1992) Phylogenetic oligodeoxynucleotide probes for the major subclasses of proteobacteria: problems and solutions. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 15, 593600.
  • Manz, W., Amann, R.I., Ludwig, W., Vancanneyt, M. and Schleifer, K.H. (1996) Application of a suite of 16S rRNA-specific oligonucleotide probes designed to investigate bacteria of the phylum cytophaga-flavobacter-bacteroides in the natural environment. Microbiology 142, 10971106.
  • Meier, H., Amann, R.I., Ludwig, W. and Schleifer, K.H. (1999) Specific oligonucleotide probes for in situ detection of a major group of Gram-positive bacteria with low DNA G + C-content. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 22, 186196.
  • Munro, P.D., Barbour, A. and Birkbeck, T.H. (1994) Comparison of the gut bacterial flora of start-feeding larval turbot under different conditions. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 77, 560566.
  • Muyzer G., de Waal, E.C. and Uitterlinden, A.G. (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59, 695700.
  • Muyzer, G., Teske, A., Wirsen, C.O. and Jannasch, H.W. (1995) Phylogenetic relationship of Thiomicrospira species and their identification in deep-sea hydrothermal vent samples during denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of 16S rDNA fragments. Archives of Microbiology 164, 165172.
  • Neef, A. (1997) Anwendung der in situ-Einzelzell-Identifizierung von Bakterien zur Populationsanalyse in komplexen mikrobiellen Biozö nosen. PhD thesis , Department of Microbiology, Technical University Munich.
  • Ohkuma, M. and Kudo, T. (1996) Phylogenetic diversity of the intestinal bacterial community in the termite Reticulitermes seperatus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62, 461468.
  • Onarheim, A.M. and Raa, J. (1990) Characteristics and possible biological significance of an autochthonous flora in the intestinal mucosa of sea-water fish. In Microbiology in Poecilotherms ed. Lésel, R. pp. 197201. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
  • Picard, C., Ponsonnet, C., Paget, E., Nesme, X. and Simonet, P. (1992) Detection and enumeration of bacteria in soil by direct DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58, 27172722.
  • Poulsen, L.K., Ballard, G. and Stahl, D. (1993) Use of rRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization for measuring the activity of single cells in young and established biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59, 13541360.
  • Reysenbach, A.L., Giver, L.J., Wickham, S. and Pace, N.R. (1992) Differential amplification of rRNA genes by polymerase chain reaction. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58, 34173418.
  • Ringø, E., Strøm, E. and Tabachek, J.A. (1995) Intestinal microflora of salmonids. A review. Aquaculture Research 26, 773789.
  • Ringø, E., Lødemel, J.B., Myklebust, R., Kaino, T., Mayhew, T.M. and Olsen, R.E. (2001a) Epithelium-associated bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L.). An electromicroscopical study. Journal of Applied Microbiology 90, 294300.
  • Ringø, E., Wesmajervi, M.S., Bendiksen, H.R., Berg, A., Olsen, R.E., Johnsen, T., Mikkelsen, H., Seppola, M. et al. (2001b) Identification and characterization of Carnobacteria isolated from fish intestine. Systematic and Applied Microbiology 24, 183191.
  • Robinson, I.M., Whipp, S.C., Bucklin, J.A. and Allison, M.J. (1984) Characterization of predominant bacteria from the colons of normal and dysenteric pigs. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 48, 964969.
  • Roller, C., Wagner, M., Amann, R.I., Ludwig, W. and Schleifer, K.H. (1994) In situ probing of Gram-positive bacteria with high DNA G + C content using 23S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotides. Microbiology 140, 28492858.
  • Sakata, T., Okabayashi, J. and Kakimoto, D. (1980a) Variations in the intestinal flora of tilapia reared in fresh and sea water. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 46, 967975.
  • Sakata, T., Sugita, H., Mitsuoka, T., Kakimoto, D. and Kadota, H. (1980b) Isolation and distribution of obligate anaerobic bacteria from the intestines of freshwater fish. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 46, 12491255.
  • Singer, S.M. and Nash, T.E. (2000) The role of normal flora in Giardia lamblia infections in mice. Journal of Infectious Diseases 181, 15101512.
  • Skov, M.N., Pedersen, K. and Larsen, J.L. (1995) Comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, ribotyping and plasmid profiling for typing of Vibrio anguillarum serovar O1. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 15401545.
  • Spanggaard, B., Huber, I., Nielsen, J., Nielsen, T., Appel, K.F. and Gram, L. (2000) The microflora of rainbow trout: a comparison of traditional and molecular identification. Aquaculture 182, 115.
  • Spanggaard, B., Huber, I., Nielsen, J., Slierendrecht, H., Sick, E.B. and Gram, L. (2001) The probiotic potential against vibriosis of the indigenous microflora of rainbow trout. Environmental Microbiology 3, 755767.
  • Springer, N., Ludwig, W., Drozanski, W., Amann, R.I. and Schleifer, K.H. (1992) The phylogenetic status of Sarcobium lyticum, an obligate intracellular bacterial parasite of small amoebae. FEMS Microbiology Letters 75, 199202.
  • Stackebrandt, E. and Goebel, B.M. (1994) Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 44, 846849.
  • Stackebrandt, E. and Rainey, F.A. (1995) Partial and complete 16S rDNA sequences, their use in generation of 16S rDNA phylogenetic trees and their implications in molecular ecological studies. In Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual, Vol. 3.4.4 ed. Akkermans, A.D.L., vanElsas, J.D. and deBruijn, F.J. pp. 117. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Stahl, D.A., Flesher, B., Mansfield, H.R. and Montgomery, L. (1988) Use of phylogenetically based hybridization probes for studies of ruminal microbial ecology. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 54, 10791084.
  • Sugita, H., Tsunohara, M., Ohkoshi, T. and Degushi, Y. (1988) The establishment of an intestinal microflora in developing goldfish (Carassius auratus) of culture ponds. Microbial Ecology 15, 333344.
  • Sugita, H., Tanaka, K., Yoshinami, M. and Deguchi, Y. (1995) Distribution of Aeromonas species in the intestinal tracts of river fish. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 41284130.
  • Sugita, H., Kawasaki, J. and Deguchi, Y. (1997) Production of amylase by the intestinal microflora of cultured freshwater fish. Letters in Applied Microbiology 42, 105108.
  • Trust, T.J. and Sparrow, R.A.H. (1974). The bacterial flora in the alimentary tract of freshwater salmonid fishes. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 20, 12191228.
  • Van der Waaij, D. (1989) The ecology of the human intestine and its consequences for overgrowth by pathogens such as Clostridium difficile. Annual Review of Microbiology 43, 6787.
  • Van Elsas, J.D. and van Overbeek, L.S. (1993) Bacterial responses to soil stimuli. In Starvation in Bacteria ed. Kjelleberg, S. pp. 5580. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Wagner, M., Amann, R.I., Lemmer, H. and Schleifer, K.-H. (1993) Probing activated sludge with oligonucleotides specific for Proteobacteria: inadequacy of culture-dependent methods for describing microbial community structure. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59, 15201525.
  • Wagner, M., Erhart, R., Manz, W., Amann, R.I., Lemmer, H., Wedi, A. and Schleifer K.H. (1994) Development of an rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe for the genus Acinetobacter and its application for in situ monitoring in activated sludge. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60, 792800.
  • Westerdahl, A., Olsson, J.C. and Kjelleberg, S. (1991) Isolation and characterization of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)-isolated associated bacteria with inhibitory effects against Vibrio anguillarum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 57, 22232228.
  • Yoshimizu, M. and Kimura, T. (1976) Study of the intestinal microflora of salmonids. Fish Pathology 10, 243259.