SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Anderson, S. (1997) Mammals of Bolivia, taxonomy and distribution. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 231, 1 652.
  • 2
    Blackburn, T.M. & Gaston, K.J. (1998) Some methodological issues in macroecology. American Naturalist, 151, 68 83.
  • 3
    Braun, J.K. & Mares, M.A. (1995) A new genus and species of phyllotine rodent (Rodentia: Muridae: Sigmodontinae: Phyllotini) from South America. Journal of Mammalogy, 76, 504 521.
  • 4
    Brown, J.H. (1995) Macroecology, p. 269. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
  • 5
    Brown, J.H. & Kurzius, M.A. (1987) Composition of desert rodent faunas: combinations of coexisting species. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 24, 227 237.
  • 6
    Cabrera, A.L. & Willink, A. (1980) Biogeografía de América Latina, p. 117. Serie Biología, Monografía 13. OEA,Washington, DC.
  • 7
    Cajal, J.L. & Bonaventura, S.M. (1998) Densidad, biomasa y diversidad de mamíferos en la Puna y Cordillera Frontal. Bases para la conservación y manejo de la Puna y Cordillera Frontal de Argentina, el rol de las Reservas de la Biósfera (ed. by J.L.Cajal, R.Tecchi & J.Garcia Fernandez). Unesco, Montevideo, Uruguay, pp. 191 213.
  • 8
    Campos, C.M. (1997) Utilización de Recursos Alimentarios Por Mamíferos Medianos Y Pequeños Del Desierto Del Monte, p. 183. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.
  • 9
    Chesser, T.R. & Hackett, S.J. (1992). Mammalian diversity in South America. Science, 256, 1502 1504.
  • 10
    Contreras, L.C. & Yañez, J.L. (1995) Mamiferos, Diversidad Biológica de Chile (ed. by J.Simonetti, M.K.Arroyo, A.Spotorno & E.Lozada), pp. 336 349, Conicyt, Chile.
  • 11
    Downing, J.A. (1991) Comparing apples with oranges: methods of interecosystem comparisons. Comparative Analyses of Ecosystems: Patterns, Mechanisms and Theories (ed. by J.Cole, G.Lovett & S.Findlay), pp. 24 45. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  • 12
    Fonseca, G.A.B., Herrman, G., Leite, Y.L.R., Mittermeir, R.A.M., Rylands, A.B., Patton, J.L. (1996) Lista anotada de los mamiferos do Brasil. Conservation International and Fundacao Biodiversitas . Occasional Paper 4, 1 38.
  • 13
    Gotelli, N.J. & Graves, G.R. (1996) Null Models in Ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.
  • 14
    Hershkovitz, P. (1972) The recent mammals of the Neotropical Region: a zoogeographic and ecological review. Evolution, Mammals, and Southern Continents (ed. by A.Keast, F.C.Erk & B.Glass), pp. 311 431. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
  • 15
    Hueck, K. & Seibert, P. (1981) Vegetationskarte von Südamerika, 2nd edn, p. 90. Fischer, Stuttgart, West Germany.
  • 16
    Kelt, D.A., Brown, J.H., Heske, E.J., Marquet, P.A., Morton, S.R., Reid, J.R., Rogovin, K.A., Shenbrot, G. (1996) Community structure of desert small mammals. comparisons across four continents. Ecology, 77, 746 761.
  • 17
    Lopez de Casenave, J.L., Cueto, V., Marone, L. (1998) Granivory in the Monte desert, Argentina: is it less intense than in other arid zones of the world? Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 7, 197 204.
  • 18
    Mares, M.A. (1980) Convergent evolution among desert rodents: a global perspective. Bulletin of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 16, 1 51.
  • 19
    Mares, M.A. (1985) Mammal faunas of xeric habitats and the Great American Interchange. The Great American Interchange (ed. by F.Stehli & S.D.Webb), pp. 489 520. Plenum, New York.
  • 20
    Mares, M.A. (1992) Neotropical mammals and the myth of Amazonian biodiversity. Science, 255, 976 979.
  • 21
    Mares, M.A. (1993) Heteromyids and their ecological counterparts: a pandesertic view of rodent ecology and evolution. Biology of the Heteromyidae (ed. by H.H.Genoways & J.H.Brown), pp. 652 719. Special Publication of the American Society of Mammalogists, 10.
  • 22
    Mares, M.A., Ojeda, R.A., Braun, J.K., Barquez, R.M. (1997) Systematics, distribution, and ecology of the mammals of Catamarca Province, Argentina. Life Among the Muses: Papers in Honor of James S. Findley (ed. by T.L.Yates, W.L.Gannon & D.E.Wilson), pp. 89 141. The Museum of Southwestern Biology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.
  • 23
    Marquet, P.A. (1989) Paleobiogeography of South American cricetid rodents: a critique to Caviedes and Iriarte. Revista Chilena Historia Natural, 62, 193 197.
  • 24
    Marquet, P.A., Contreras, L.C., Silva, S., Torres-Mura, J.C., Bozinovic, F. (1993) Natural history of Microcavia niata in the high Andean zone of northern Chile. Journal of Mammalogy, 74, 136 140.
  • 25
    Meigs, P. (1953) World distribution of arid and semi-arid homoclimates. Review of Research on Arid Zone Hydrology, pp. 203 209. Arid Zone Programme, I. Unesco, Paris.
  • 26
    Meserve, P.L. (1981) Trophic relationships among small mammals in a Chilean semiarid thorn scrub community. Journal of Mammalogy, 62, 304 314.
  • 27
    Meserve, P.L. & Glanz, W.E. (1978) Geographical ecology of small mammals in the northern Chilean arid zone. Journal of Biogeography, 5, 135 148.
  • 28
    Monjeau, J.A., Bonino, N., Saba, S. (1994) Annotated checklist of the living land mammals in Patagonia, Argentina. Mastozoologia Neotropical, 1, 143 156.
  • 29
    Morello, J. (1984) Perfil Ecológico de Sudamérica, 1st edn, p. 93. Cultura Hispánica. Instituto de Cooperación Iberoamericana, Barcelona, Spain.
  • 30
    Morton, S.R. (1979) Diversity of desert-dwelling mammals: a comparison of Australia and North America. Journal of Mammalogy, 60, 253 264.
  • 31
    Morton, S.R. (1985) Granivory in arid regions: comparison of Australia with North and South America. Ecology, 66, 1859 1866.
  • 32
    Morton, S.R., Brown, J.H., Kelt, D.A., Reid, J.R.W. (1994) Comparisons of community structure among small mammals of North American and Australian deserts. Australian Journal of Zoology, 42, 501 525.
  • 33
    Ojeda, R.A. & Mares, M.A. (1989) A biogeographic analysis of the mammals of Salta Province, Argentina: Patterns of Species Assemblages in the Neotropics. Special Publications, The Museum. Texas Tech University, 27, 1 66.
  • 34
    Ojeda, R.A., Roig, V.G., Borghi, C.E. (2000) Diversidad y conservación de los mamíferos de Argentina: un panorama sintético. Biodiversidad Y Conservación de Mamíferos Neotropicales (ed. by G.Ceballos & J.Simonetti), Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, in press.
  • 35
    Pacheco, V. & Patton, J. (1995) A. new species of the Puna mouse, genus Punomys Osgood 1943 (Muridae, Sigmodontinae) from the southeastern Andes of Peru. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 60, 85 96.
  • 36
    Pearson, O.P. (1951) Mammals in the highlands of southern Peru. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 106, 117 174.
  • 37
    Pearson, O.P. (1995) Annotated keys for identifying small mammals living in or near Nahuel Huapi National Park, southern Argentina. Mastozoologia Neotropical, 2, 99 148.
  • 38
    Pearson, O.P. & Ralph, C.P. (1978) The diversity and abundance of vertebrates along an altitudinal gradient in Perú. Memorias Del Museo Historia Natural Javier Prado, 18, 1 97.
  • 39
    Pine, R.H., Miller, S.D., Schamberger, M.L. (1979) Contributions to the Mammalogy of Chile. Mammalia, 43, 341 376.
  • 40
    Redford, K.H. & Eisenberg, J.F. (1992) Mammals of the Neotropics , Vol. 2. The Southern Cone: Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, p. 430. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • 41
    Reig, O.A. (1981) Teoría del origen y desarrollo de la fauna de América del Sur. Monografiae Naturae , 1, Museo Municipal de Ciencias Naturales ‘Lorenzo Scaglia’, pp. 1 162. Mar del Plata, Argentina.
  • 42
    Reig, O.A. (1986) Diversity patterns and differentiation of Andean rodents. High Altitude Tropical Biogeography (ed. by F.Viulleumier & M.Monasterio), pp. 405 439. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • 43
    Roig, V.G. (1991) Desertification and distribution of mammals in the southern cone of South America. Latin America Mammalogy (ed. by M.A.Mares & D.Schmidly), pp. 239 279. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman Oklahoma.
  • 44
    Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D. (eds) (1993) Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives, p. 414. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
  • 45
    Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York.
  • 46
    Spotorno, A.E., Zuleta, C., Gantz, A. et al. (1998) Sistemática y adaptación de mamíferos, aves e insectos fitófagos de la Región de Antofagasta, Chile. Revista Chilena Historia Natural, 71, 501 526.
  • 47
    Steppan, S.J. (1998) Phylogenetic relationships and species limits within Phyllotis (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae): concordance between mtDNA sequence and morphology. Journal of Mammalogy, 79, 573 593.
  • 48
    Streilein, K.E. (1982) Ecology of small mammals in the semiarid Brazilian Caatinga. I. Climate and faunal composition. Annals of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 51, 79 197.
  • 49
    Walker, L.I., Spotorno, A.E., Arrau, J. (1984) Cytogenetics and reproductive studies of two nominal subspecies of Phyllotis darwini and their experimental hybrids. Journal of Mammalogy, 65, 220 230.
  • 50
    Wilson, D.E. & Reeder, D.M. (eds) (1993) Mammal Species of the World: Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 2nd edn, p. 1206. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.