A comparison of a discovery-based and an event-based method of historical biogeography
Article first published online: 21 DEC 2001
Journal of Biogeography
Volume 28, Issue 6, pages 757–767, June 2001
How to Cite
Brooks, D. R. and McLennan, D. A. (2001), A comparison of a discovery-based and an event-based method of historical biogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 28: 757–767. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00598.x
- Issue published online: 21 DEC 2001
- Article first published online: 21 DEC 2001
- Dispersal-vicariance analysis (DIVA);
- Brooks Parsimony analysis (BPA);
- event-based methods;
- discovery-based methods;
- historical biogeography;
The event-based method Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis (DIVA) is compared with the discovery-based method Brooks Parsimony analysis (BPA).
South-western USA, Mexico and northern Central America.
Results of DIVA of phylogenetic trees for six clades of birds inhabiting seven areas in the south-western US, Mexico and northern Central America are compared with those of BPA for the same data set.
Both approaches identify the same vicariant elements but differ in the way they treat dispersal. DIVA places such elements in one general ‘dispersal’ category, while BPA identifies different forms of dispersal, including peripheral isolates speciation (speciation by dispersal), post-speciation dispersal, non-response to a vicariance event, secondary contact between congeners (and the potential for reinforcement completing speciation) and potential extinction resulting from competition between a resident and a colonizing congener.
BPA is more sensitive than DIVA with respect to the different possible manifestations of geographical dispersal. Despite substantial dispersal, avian communities in these areas manifest substantial historical structuring.