SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Albrecht, H. & Bachthaler, G. (1988) Die Segetalflora zweier bayerischer Ackerstandorte 1986/87 im Vergleich zu Untersuchentsergebnissen von 1955/56 bzw. 1965. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, Sonderheft, 11, 163 174.
  • Andersson, T.N. & Milberg, P. (1998) Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation, and nitrogen. Weed Science, 46, 30 38.
  • Andreasen, C., Streibig, J.C., Haas, H. (1991) Soil properties affecting the distribution of 37 weed species in Danish fields. Weed Research, 31, 181 187.
  • Andreasen, C., Stryhn, H., Streibig, J.C. (1996) Decline of the flora in Danish arable fields. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 619 626.
  • Anonymous (1997) Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics 1997. Statistiska Centralbyrån, Halmstad, Sweden[in Swedish with English summary].
  • Baskin, C.C. & Baskin, J.M. (1998) Seeds. Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  • Baskin, J.M. & Baskin, C.C. (1990) The role of light and alternating temperatures on germination of Polygonum aviculare seeds exhumed on various dates. Weed Research, 30, 397 402.
  • Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1985) canoco – A fortran Program for Canonical Correspondence Analysis and Detrended Correspondence Analysis. IWIS-TNO, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
  • Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1986) Canonical correspondence analyses: a new eigenvector method for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology, 67, 1167 1179.
  • Ter Braak, C.J.F. (1988) Partial canonical correspondence analysis. Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis (ed. H.H.Bock), pp. 551 558. North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Ter Braak, C.J.F. & Smilauer, P. (1998) canoco Reference Manual and User's Guide to canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination, version 4. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY.
  • Clason, Å. & Granström, B. (1992) Agriculture. National Atlas of Sweden.
  • Dale, M.R.T., Thomas, A.G., John, E.A. (1992) Environmental factors including management practices as correlates of weed community composition in spring seeded crops. Canadian Journal of Botany, 70, 1931 1939.
  • Draper, N.R. & Smith, H. (1981) Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, NY.
  • Erviö, L.-R. & Salonen, J. (1987) Changes in the weed population of spring cereals in Finland. Annales Agriculturae Fenniae, 26, 201 226.
  • Erviö, R., Hyvärinen, S., Erviö, L.-R., Salonen, J. (1994) Soil properties affecting weed distribution in spring cereal and vegetable fields. Agricultural Science in Finland, 3, 497 504.
  • Fogelfors, H. (1977) Åkerogräs i Sverige, 4th edn. Lantbrukshögskolans Rapport B19, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Gauch, H.G. (1982) Multivariate Analysis and Community Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Håkansson, S. (1967) Experiments with Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. I. Development and growth, and the response to burial at different developmental stages. Lantbrukshögskolans Annaler, 33, 823 873.
  • Håkansson, S. (1969) Experiments with Sonchus arvensis L. I. Development and growth, and the response to burial and defoliation in different developmental stages. Lantbrukshögskolans Annaler, 35, 989 1030.
  • Håkansson, S. (1983) Seasonal variation in the emergence of annual weeds – an introductory investigation in Sweden. Weed Research, 23, 313 324.
  • Håkansson, S. (1992) Germination of weed seeds in different seasons. IXth International Symposium on the Biology of Weeds, Dijon, pp. 45 54. ANPP, Paris, France.
  • Håkansson, S. (1995) Weeds in agricultural crops. I. Life-forms and occurrence under Swedish conditions. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research, 25, 143 154.
  • Hallgren, E. (1996a) Occurrence of broad-leaved weeds on different soils in different crops in Sweden. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research, 26, 115 123.
  • Hallgren, E. (1996b) Do the weed flora and the effect of the herbicide change with time? Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, (eds H.Brown et al.) pp. 1355 1368. Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology, Flakkebjerg, Denmark.
  • Heikkinen, R.K. (1996) Predicting patterns of vascular plant species richness with composite variables: a meso-scale study in Finnish Lapland. Vegetatio, 126, 151 165.
  • Hilbig, W. & Bachthaler, G. (1992a) Wirtschaftsbedingte Veränderungen der Segetalvegetation in Deutschland im Zeitraum von 1950–1990. I. Angewandte Botanik, 66, 192 200.
  • Hilbig, W. & Bachthaler, G. (1992b) Wirtschaftsbedingte Veränderungen der Segetalvegetation in Deutschland im Zeitraum von 1950–1990. II. Angewandte Botanik, 66, 201 209.
  • Hill, M.O. & Gauch, H.G. Jr (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio, 42, 47 58.
  • Kvist, M. & Håkansson, S. (1985) Rhythm and Dormancy Periods in the Vegetative Development and Growth of some Perennial Weeds. Report 156. Department of Crop Production Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden[in Swedish with English summary].
  • Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical Ecology, 2nd English edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Milberg, P. & Andersson, L. (1997) Seasonal variation in dormancy and light sensitivity in buried seeds of eight annual weed species. Canadian Journal of Botany, 75, 1998 2004.
  • Ohmann, J.L. & Spies, T.A. (1998) Regional gradient analysis and spatial pattern of woody plant communities of Oregon forests. Ecological Monographs, 68, 151 182.
  • Økland, R.H. (1996) Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? Journal of Vegetation Science, 7, 289 292.
  • Økland, R.H. (1999) On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes. Journal of Vegetation Science, 10, 131 136.
  • Økland, R.H. & Eilertsen, O. (1994) Canonical correspondence analyses with variation partitioning: some comments and an application. Journal of Vegetation Science, 5, 117 126.
  • Peet, R.K. (1980) Ordination as a tool for analyzing complex data sets. Vegetatio, 42, 171 174.
  • Pysek, P. & Leps, J. (1991) Response of a weed community to nitrogen fertilization: a multivariate analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2, 237 244.
  • Reichard, S.H. & Hamilton, C.W. (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology, 11, 193 203.
  • Roche, P., Tatoni, T., Médail, F. (1998) Relative importance of abiotic and land use factors in explaining variation in woody vegetation in a French rural landscape. Journal of Vegetation Science, 9, 221 228.
  • Saavedra, M., Garcia-Torres, L., Hernandez-Bermejo, E., Hidalgo, B. (1990) Influence of environmental factors on the weed flora in crops in the Guadalquivir Valley. Weed Research, 30, 363 374.
  • Salonen, J. (1993) Weed infestation and factors affecting weed incidence in spring cereals in Finland – a multivariate approach. Agricultural Science in Finland, 2, 525 536.
  • Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York, NY.
  • Svensson, R. & Wigren, M. (1983) The weed flora of arable land in 1958 and 1980 in some parishes in Scania. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift, 77, 241 257[in Swedish with English summary].
  • Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., Webb, D.A. (196480) Flora Europaea, Vols 1–5. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.
  • Williams, E.D. (1979) Studies on the depth distribution and on the germination and growth of Equisetum arvense L. (field horsetail) from tubers. Weed Research, 19, 25 32.
  • Wilson, J.B. & Roxburgh, S.H. (1994) A demonstration of guild-based assembly rules for a plant community, and determination of intrinsic guilds. Oikos, 69, 267 276.
  • Zanin, G., Otto, S., Riello, L., Borin, M. (1997) Ecological interpretation of weed flora dynamics under different tillage systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 66, 177 188.