Livestock grazing in subtropical pastures: steps in the analysis of attribute response and plant functional types

Authors

  • S. McIntyre,

    Corresponding authorSearch for more papers by this author
  • Sandra Lavorel

    1. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, 120 Meiers Rd, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia; and Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, CNRS UPR 9056 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier Cedex 5, France, and Ecosystem Dynamics Group, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra Australian Capital Territory, 0200, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

Sue McIntyre, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, 120 Meiers Rd, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia (e-mailSue.McIntyre@cse.csiro.au).

Summary

  • 1In order to investigate the use of plant functional types as an alternative to floristic descriptions of response to grazing, we analysed plant communities from a cattle grazing experiment conducted in grassy eucalypt woodland in subtropical Queensland, Australia. The two variables analysed (landscape position and stocking rate) accounted for similar proportions of variation in the vegetation ground layer, although forbs were more sensitive to slope position and perennial grasses were more sensitive to stocking rate.
  • 2As grazing pressure increased, perennial grasses declined, while the relative proportion of forbs and annual grasses increased. Detailed functional group analyses were conducted for the perennial grass and forb life-forms. Annual grasses were represented by only two species, preventing identification of functional types within this life-form.
  • 3We conducted a five-step analysis for both perennial grasses and forbs as follows: (i) defining grazing-related species response groups; (ii) defining species groups based on natural attribute correlations; (iii) identifying attributes that changed significantly with grazing; (iv) identifying syndromes by relating (ii) and (iii); (v) describing functional types from (iii) and (iv), and assessing them against actual species response.
  • 4Eight grass and eight forb functional types were identified. Of the taxa that had an observed response to grazing, 54% of the grass taxa and 57% of the forb taxa corresponded to one of these functional types in terms of meeting both grazing response and trait criteria. The five-stage analysis provided a comprehensive but complex approach to functional type identification.
  • 5The functional types identified can be summarized as follows. Low levels of grazing were associated with more medium-sized, moderately leafy perennial grasses with wind-dispersed or adhesive seeds, and more erect or twining forbs with large to medium sized seeds. High levels of grazing were associated with: more annual grasses; low-growing leafy perennial grasses with small seeds having no dispersal appendages; mat-forming large-seeded forbs; and low-growing, scrambling, small-seeded forbs.

Ancillary