Adhesive bonding of composite material to cast titanium with varying surface preparations

  1. H. Yanagida1,
  2. H. Matsumura1,
  3. Y. Taira1,
  4. M. Atsuta1,
  5. S. Shimoe2

Article first published online: 25 JAN 2002

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00811.x

Issue

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volume 29, Issue 2, pages 121–126, February 2002

Additional Information

How to Cite

Yanagida, H. , Matsumura, H. , Taira, Y. , Atsuta, M. and Shimoe, S. (2002), Adhesive bonding of composite material to cast titanium with varying surface preparations. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 29: 121–126. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00811.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Nagasaki University School of Dentistry, Nagasaki, Japan,

  2. 2

    Dental Laboratory Centre, Nagasaki University Hospital of Dentistry, Nagasaki, Japan

* Dr Hideo Matsumura Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Nagasaki University School of Dentistry, 1-7-1, Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan. E-mail: hmatsu@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 25 JAN 2002
  2. Article first published online: 25 JAN 2002

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (124K)

Keywords:

  • bonding;
  • composite;
  • phosphate;
  • titanium

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the surface preparation effects of eight metal conditioners and an adhesive system on bonding between a prosthodontic composite material and cast titanium. Eight primers designed for conditioning base metal alloys (Acryl Bond, All-Bond 2 Primer B, Alloy Primer, Cesead II Opaque Primer, Eye Sight Opaque Primer, Metafast Bonding Liner, Metal Primer II, and MR Bond) as well as a surface modification technique (Siloc) were assessed. Disk specimens cast from titanium (T-Alloy H) were either primed with one of the eight primers or treated with the Siloc system, and then bonded with a light-activated composite material (Artglass). Bond durability was evaluated by thermocycling (4 and 60 °C, 1 min each, 20 000 cycles). After thermocycling, two groups either primed with the Cesead II Opaque Primer material or treated with the Siloc system exhibited significantly greater bond strength (20·0 and 19·0 MPa) than the other groups (0·2–12·6 MPa, P < 0·05). These two systems are considered to be useful for improving bonding between the titanium and the composite material tested.

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (124K)