SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association 1999.
  • 2
    Crossley J, Humphris G, Jolly B. Assessing health professionals. Med Educ 2002;36: 8004.
  • 3
    Cronbach LJ. Test validation. In: Educational Measurement, 2nd edn. Ed: ThorndikeRL. Washington, DC: American Council on Education 1971:443507.
  • 4
    Cronbach LJ. Five perspectives on validity argument. In: Test Validity. Eds: WainerH, BraunH. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1988:317.
  • 5
    Cronbach LJ. Construct validation after 30 years. In: Intelligence: Measurement, Theory, and Public Policy. Ed: LinnRE. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press 1989:14771.
  • 6
    Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 1955;52: 281302.
  • 7
    Messick S. The psychology of educational measurement. J Educ Measure 1984;21: 21537.
  • 8
    Messick S. Validity. In: Educational Measurement, 3rd edn. Ed: LinnRL. New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan 1989:13104.
  • 9
    Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychologist 1995;50: 7419.
  • 10
    Messick S. Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educ Measure Issues Prac 1995;14: 58.
  • 11
    Kane MT. An argument-based approach to validation. Psychol Bull 1992;112: 52735.
  • 12
    Kane MT. Validating interpretive arguments for licensure and certification examinations. Evaluation Health Professions 1994;17: 13359.
  • 13
    Kane MT. Current concerns in validity theory. J Educ Measure 2001;38: 31942.
  • 14
    Kane MT, Crooks TJ, Cohen AS. Validating measures of performance. Educ Measure Issues Prac 1999;18: 517.
  • 15
    Cureton EE. Validity. In: Educational Measurement. Ed: LingquistEF. Washington, DC: American Council on Education 1951:62194.
  • 16
    Lohman DF. Teaching and testing to develop fluid abilities. Educational Reser 1993;22: 1223.
  • 17
    Linn RL. Validation of the uses and interpretations of results of state assessment and accountability systems. In: Large-Scale Assessment Programs for All Students: Development, Implementation, and Analysis. Eds: TindalG, HaladynaT. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 2002.
  • 18
    Loevinger J. Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychol Reports, Monograph 1957;3 (Suppl.) 63594.
  • 19
    Haladyna TM, Downing SM, Rodriguez MC. A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Appl Measure Educ 2002;15: 30934.
  • 20
    Boulet JR, McKinley DW, Whelan GP, Hambelton RK. Quality assurance methods for performance-based assessments. Adv Health Sci Educ 2003;8: 2747.
  • 21
    Brennan RL. Generalizability Theory. New York: Springer-Verlag 2001.
  • 22
    Crossley J, Davies H, Humphris G, Jolly B. Generalisability; a key to unlock professional assessment. Med Educ 2002;36: 9728.
  • 23
    Van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK. Item response theory. Brief history, common models, and extensions. In: Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Eds: Van Der LindenWJ, HambletonRK. New York: Springer-Verlag 1997:128.
  • 24
    Downing SM. Item response theory: Applications of modern test theory in medical education. Med Educ 2003;37: 17.
  • 25
    Holland PW, Wainer H, eds. Differential Item Functioning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1993.
  • 26
    Penfield RD, Lam RCM. Assessing differential item functioning in performance assessment: review and recommendations. Educ Measure Issues Prac 2000;19: 515.
  • 27
    Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psych Bull 1959;56: 81105.
  • 28
    Norcini JJ. Setting standards on educational tests. Med Educ 2003;37: 4649.
  • 29
    Subkoviak MJ. A practitioner's guide to computation and interpretation of reliability indices for mastery tests. J Educ Measure 1988;25: 4755.
  • 30
    Angoff WH. Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In: Educational Measurement, 2nd edn. Ed: ThorndikeRL. Washington, DC: American Council on Education 1971:508600.
  • 31
    Newble DI, Jaeger K. The effects of assessment and examinations on the learning of medical students. Med Educ 1983;17: 16571.