Get access

Estimating allelic richness: Effects of sample size and bottlenecks

Authors

  • P. L. Leberg

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Biology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA
      Paul L. Leberg. Fax: + 337 4825660; E-mail: leberg@louisiana.edu
    Search for more papers by this author

Paul L. Leberg. Fax: + 337 4825660; E-mail: leberg@louisiana.edu

Abstract

Although differences in sampling intensity can bias comparisons of allelic richness (A) among populations, investigators often fail to correct estimates of A for differences in sample size. Methods that standardize A on the basis of the size of the smallest number of samples in a comparison are preferable to other approaches. Rarefaction and repeated random subsampling provide unbiased estimates of A with the greatest precision and thus provide greatest statistical power to detect differences in variation. Less promising approaches, in terms of bias or precision, include single random subsampling, eliminating very small samples, using sample size as a covariate or extrapolating estimates obtained from small samples to a larger number of individuals.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary