Get access

Genetic structure of the forest herb Primula elatior in a changing landscape

Authors

  • Hans Jacquemyn,

    Corresponding author
    1. Laboratory for Forest, Nature and Landscape Research, University of Leuven, Belgium, Vital Decosterstraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium,
      Hans Jacquemyn. Fax: + 32 16 32 97 60; E-mail: hans.jacquemyn@agr.kuleuven.ac.be
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Olivier Honnay,

    1. Laboratory for Forest, Nature and Landscape Research, University of Leuven, Belgium, Vital Decosterstraat 102, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium,
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Peter Galbusera,

    1. University Antwerp, Department of Biology, Laboratory of Animal Ecology, Universitatsplein 1, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium,
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Isabel Roldán-Ruiz

    1. Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, Agricultural Research Centre, Caritasstraat 21, 9090 Melle, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author

Hans Jacquemyn. Fax: + 32 16 32 97 60; E-mail: hans.jacquemyn@agr.kuleuven.ac.be

Abstract

To investigate whether changes in land use and associated forest patch turnover affected genetic diversity and structure of the forest herb Primula elatior, historical data on landscape changes were combined with a population genetic analysis using dominant amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Based on nine topographic maps, landscape history was reconstructed and forest patches were assigned to two age classes: young (less than 35 years) and old (more than 35 years). The level of differentiation among Primula populations in recently established patches was compared with the level of differentiation among populations in older patches. Genetic diversity was independent of population size (P > 0.05). Most genetic variation was present within populations. Within-population diversity levels tended to be higher for populations located in older forests compared with those for populations located in young forests (Hj = 0.297 and 0.285, respectively). Total gene diversity was also higher for old than for young populations (Ht = 0.2987 and 0.2828, respectively). The global fixation index FST averaged over loci was low, but significant. Populations in older patches were significantly more differentiated from each other than were populations in recently established patches and they showed significant isolation by distance. In contrast, no significant correlations between pairwise geographical distance and FST were found for populations in recently established patches. The location of young and old populations in the studied system and altered gene flow because of increased population density and decreased inter-patch distances between extant populations may explain the observed lower genetic differentiation in the younger populations. This study exemplifies the importance of incorporating data on historical landscape changes in population genetic research at the landscape scale.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary