New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations

Authors

  • X. Vekemans,

    Corresponding author
    1. Université de Lille 1, Laboratoire de Génétique et Evolution des Populations Végétales, UMR CNRS 8016, Bat SN2, F- 59655 Villeneuve d’Ascq cedex, France,
      X. Vekemans. Fax: 33 3 20 43 69 79; E-mail: xavier.vekemans@University-lille1.fr
    Search for more papers by this author
  • O. J. Hardy

    1. Université Libre de Bruxelles, Laboratoire de Génétique et Ecologie Végétales, Chaussée de Wavre 1850, B-1160 Bruxelles, Belgium
    Search for more papers by this author

X. Vekemans. Fax: 33 3 20 43 69 79; E-mail: xavier.vekemans@University-lille1.fr

Abstract

Many empirical studies have assessed fine-scale spatial genetic structure (SGS), i.e. the nonrandom spatial distribution of genotypes, within plant populations using genetic markers and spatial autocorrelation techniques. These studies mostly provided qualitative descriptions of SGS, rendering quantitative comparisons among studies difficult. The theory of isolation by distance can predict the pattern of SGS under limited gene dispersal, suggesting new approaches, based on the relationship between pairwise relatedness coefficients and the spatial distance between individuals, to quantify SGS and infer gene dispersal parameters. Here we review the theory underlying such methods and discuss issues about their application to plant populations, such as the choice of the relatedness statistics, the sampling scheme to adopt, the procedure to test SGS, and the interpretation of spatial autocorrelograms. We propose to quantify SGS by an ‘Sp’ statistic primarily dependent upon the rate of decrease of pairwise kinship coefficients between individuals with the logarithm of the distance in two dimensions. Under certain conditions, this statistic estimates the reciprocal of the neighbourhood size. Reanalysing data from, mostly, published studies, the Sp statistic was assessed for 47 plant species. It was found to be significantly related to the mating system (higher in selfing species) and to the life form (higher in herbs than trees), as well as to the population density (higher under low density). We discuss the necessity for comparing SGS with direct estimates of gene dispersal distances, and show how the approach presented can be extended to assess (i) the level of biparental inbreeding, and (ii) the kurtosis of the gene dispersal distribution.

Ancillary