SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Alatalo RV, Mappes J, Elgar MA (1997) Heritabilities and paradigm shifts. Nature, London, 385, 402 403.
  • 2
    Apanius V, Penn D, Slev P, Ruff LR, Potts WK (1997) The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex. Critical Reviews in Immunology, 17, 179 224.
  • 3
    Arcaro KF & Eklund A (1999) A review of MHC-based mate preferences and fostering experiments in two congenic strains of mice. Genetica, 104, 241 244.
  • 4
    Arnaiz-Villena A & Festenstein H (1976) HLA genotyping by using spermatozoa: Evidence for haploid gene expression. Lancet, ii, 707 709.
  • 5
    Artzt K, Shin H-S, Bennett D (1982) Gene mapping within the T/t complex of the mouse. II. Anomalous position of the H-2 complex in t haplotypes. Cell, 28, 471 476.
  • 6
    Bateson P (1983) Optimal outbreeding. In: Mate Choice (ed. BatesonP), pp. 257 277. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • 7
    Beeman RW, Friesen KS, Denell RE (1992) Maternal-effect selfish genes in flour beetles. Science, 256, 89 92.
  • 8
    Bensch S, Hasselquist D, Vonschantz T (1994) Genetic similarity between parents predicts hatching failure — nonincestuous inbreeding in the great reed warbler. Evolution, 48, 317 326.
  • 9
    Beuchamp GK & Yamazaki K (1997) HLA and mate selection in humans: commentary. American Journal of Human Genetics, 61, 484 496.
  • 10
    Beuchamp GK, Yamazaki K, Bard J et al. (1988) Preweaning experience in the control of mating preferences by genes in the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse. Behavioral Genetics, 18, 537 547.
  • 11
    Beukeboom LW (1994) Phenotypic fitness effects of the selfish B chromosome, paternal sex ratio (PSR) in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Evolutionary Ecology, 8, 1 24.
  • 12
    Bishop JDD (1996) Female control of paternity in the internally fertilizing compound ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. 1. Autoradiographic investigation of sperm movements in the female reproductive tract. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 263, 369 376.
  • 13
    Bishop JDD, Jones CS, Noble LR (1996) Female control of paternity in the internally fertilizing compound ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. 2. Investigation of male mating success using RAPD markers . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 263, 401 407.
  • 14
    Black FL & Salzano FM (1981) Evidence for heterosis in the HLA system. American Journal of Human Genetics, 33, 894 899.
  • 15
    Blouin SF & Blouin M (1988) Inbreeding avoidance behaviors. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 230 233.
  • 16
    Borgia G (1979) Sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (eds BlumMS, BlumNA), pp. 19 80. Academic Press, New York.
  • 17
    Breeuwer JAJ & Werren JH (1993) Cytoplasmic incompatibility and bacterial density in Nasonia vitripennis. Genetics, 135, 565 574.
  • 18
    Breeuwer JAJ & Werren JH (1995) Hybrid breakdown between 2 haplodiploid species — the role of nuclear and cytoplasmic genes. Evolution, 49, 705 717.
  • 19
    Brown JL (1997) A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 60 65.
  • 20
    Brown JL (1998) The new heterozygosity theory of mate choice and the MHC. Genetica, 104, 215 221.
  • 21
    Brown JL & Eklund A (1994) Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex: an integrative review. American Naturalist, 143, 435 461.
  • 22
    Brown RE, Singh PB, Roser B (1987) The major histocompatibility complex and the chemosensory recognition of individuality in rats. Physiology and Behavior, 40, 65 73.
  • 23
    Bruck D (1957) Male segregation ratio advantage as a factor maintaining lethal alleles in wild populations of house mice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 43, 152 158.
  • 24
    Burnet FM (1971) ‘Self-recognition’ in colonial marine forms and flowering plants in relation to the evolution of immunity. Nature, London, 230, 232 235.
  • 25
    Butlin RK (1989) Reinforcement of premating isolation. In: Speciation and its Consequences (eds OtteD, EndlerJA), pp. 158 179. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  • 26
    Butlin RK & Tregenza T (1997) Is speciation no accident? Nature, London, 387, 551 552.
  • 27
    Clark AG, Begun DJ, Prout T (1999) Female × Male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science, 283, 217 220.
  • 28
    Day TH & Gilburn AS (1997) Sexual selection in seaweed flies. Advances in the Study of Behaviour, 26, 1 57.
  • 29
    Degos L, Colombani J, Chavantr A, Bengston B, Jacqard A (1974) A selective pressure on HLA polymorphism. Nature, London, 249, 62 63.
  • 30
    Delarbre C, Kashi Y, Boursot P et al. (1988) Phylogenetic distribution in the genus Mus of t-complex specific DNA and protein markers: inferences on the origin of t-haplotypes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 5, 120 133.
  • 31
    De Santis R & Pinto MR (1991) Gamete self-discrimination in ascidians — a role for the follicle cells. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 29, 47 50.
  • 32
    Dieckmann U & Doebeli M (1999) On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature, London, 400, 354 357.
  • 33
    Dobzhansky T (1948) Genetics of natural populations. XVIII. Experiments on chromosomes of Drosophila pseudoobscura from different geographical regions. Genetics, 33, 588 602.
  • 34
    Drickamer L & Lenington S (1987) T-locus effects on the male urinary chemosignal that accelerates puberty in female mice. Animal Behaviour, 35, 1581 1583.
  • 35
    Eberhard WG (1996) Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • 36
    Edwards SV, Hess CM, Gasper J, Garrigan D (1999) Toward an evolutionary genomics of the avian MHC. Immunological Reviews, 167, 119 132.
  • 37
    Eggert F, Müller-Ruchholtz W, Ferstl R (1999) Olfactory cues associated with the major histocompatibility complex. Genetica, 104, 191 197.
  • 38
    Egid K & Brown JL (1989) The major histocompatibility complex and female mating preferences in mice. Animal Behaviour, 38, 548 550.
  • 39
    Eklund A (1997) The major histocompatibility complex and mating preferences in wild house mice. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 630 634.
  • 40
    Eklund A (1999) Use of the MHC for mate choice in wild house mice (Mus domesticus) . Genetica, 104, 245 248.
  • 41
    Eklund A, Egid A, Brown JL (1991) The major histocompatibility complex and mating preferences of male mice. Animal Behaviour, 42, 693 694.
  • 42
    Fan W, Liu YC, Parimoo S, Weismann SM (1995) Olfactory receptor-like genes are located in the human major histocompatibility complex. Genomics, 27, 119 123.
  • 43
    Fellous M & Dausset J (1970) Probable haploid expression of HLA antigens on human spermatozoon. Nature, London, 225, 191 193.
  • 44
    Flajnik MF, Kasahara M, Shum BP et al. (1993) A novel type on class I gene organization in vertebrates: a large family of non-MHC-linked class I genes is expressed at the RNA level in amphibian Xenopus. EMBO Journal, 12, 4385 4396.
  • 45
    Fraser LR & Dudley K (1999) New insight into the t-complex and control of sperm function. BioEssays, 21, 304 312.
  • 46
    Gigord L, Lavigne C, Shykoff JA (1998) Partial self-incompatibility and inbreeding depression in a native tree species of La Reunion (Indian Ocean). Oecologia, 117, 342 352.
  • 47
    Gilburn AS & Day TH (1994) Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection and the alpha-beta chromosomal inversion polymorphism in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigid. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 257, 303 309.
  • 48
    Gilburn AS & Day TH (1999a) Female mating behaviour, sexual selection and chromosome I inversion karyotype in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity, 82, 276 281.
  • 49
    Gilburn AS & Day TH (1999b) Evolution of female choice in seaweed flies: Fisherian and good-genes mechanisms operate in different populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 255, 159 165.
  • 50
    Grob B, Knapp LA, Martin RD, Anzenberger G (1998) The major histocompatibility complex and mate choice: inbreeding avoidance and selection of good genes. Experimental and Clinical Immunogenetics, 15, 119 129.
  • 51
    Halim K, Wong DM, Mittal KK (1982) The HLA typing of human spermatozoa by two color fluoresces. Tissue Antigens, 19, 90 91.
  • 52
    Hamilton WD & Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science, 218, 384 387.
  • 53
    Hedrick PW & Black FL (1997) HLA and mate selection: no evidence in South Amerindians. American Journal of Human Genetics, 61, 505 511.
  • 54
    Hedrick PW & Thomson G (1983) Evidence for balancing selection at HLA. Genetics, 104, 449 456.
  • 55
    Hill AVS, Allsopp CEM, Dwiatkowski D et al. (1991) Common West African HLA antigens are associated with protection from severe malaria. Nature, London, 352, 595 600.
  • 56
    Hill AVS, Elvin J, Willis AC et al. (1992) Molecular analysis of the association of HLA-B53 and resistance to severe malaria. Nature, London, 360, 434 439.
  • 57
    Houle D (1992) Comparing the evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics, 130, 195 204.
  • 58
    Houtman AM & Falls JB (1994) Negative assortative mating in the white-throated sparrow, Zonotrichia albicollis — the role of mate choice and intra-sexual competition . Animal Behaviour, 48, 377 383.
  • 59
    Howard DJ (1999) Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 109 132.
  • 60
    Hughes AL (1992) Maintenance of MHC polymorphism. Nature, London, 335, 402 403.
  • 61
    Hurst LD, Atlan A, Bengtsson BO (1996) Genetic conflicts. Quarterly Review of Biology, 3, 251 253.
  • 62
    Janeway CA, Travers P, Walshport M, Capra JD (1999) Immunobiology: the Immune System in Health and Disease 4th edn. Elsevier Science Ltd, London.
  • 63
    Jennions MD (1997) Female promiscuity and genetic incompatibility. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12, 251 253.
  • 64
    Jiggins FM, Hurst GDD, Majerus MEN (2000) Sex-ratio distorting Wolbachia causes sex-role reversal in its butterfly host. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 267, 69 73.
  • 65
    Jin K, Ho HN, Speed TP, Gill TJ III (1995) Reproductive failure and the major histocompatibility complex. American Journal of Human Genetics, 56, 1456 1467.
  • 66
    Jordan WC & Bruford MW (1998) New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity, 81, 239 245.
  • 67
    Keil A & Sachser N (1998) Reproductive benefits from female promiscuous mating in a small mammal. Ethology, 104, 897 903.
  • 68
    Kempenaers B, Congdon B, Boag P, Robertson RJ (1999) Extrapair paternity and egg hatchability in tree swallows: evidence for the genetic compatibility hypothesis? Behavioral Ecology, 10, 304 311.
  • 69
    Klein J (1986) Natural History of the Major Histocompatibility Complex. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
  • 70
    Knapp LA, Ha JC, Sackett GP (1996) Parental MHC antigen sharing and pregnancy wastage in captive pigtail macaques. Journal of Reproductive Immunology, 32, 73 88.
  • 71
    Komlos L, Zamir R, Joshua H, Halbrecht I (1977) Common HLA antigens in couples with repeated abortions. Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology, 7, 330 335.
  • 72
    Kondrashov AS & Kondrashov FA (1999) Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature, London, 400, 351 354.
  • 73
    Kostyu DD, Dawson DV, Elias S, Ober C (1993) Deficit of HLA homozygotes in a Caucasian isolate. Human Immunology, 37, 135 142.
  • 74
    Kuby J (1997) Immunology 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York.
  • 75
    Lande R & Wilkinson GS (1999) Models of sex ratio meiotic drive and sexual selection in stalk-eyed flies. Genetical Research, 74, 245 253.
  • 76
    Lenington S (1983) Social preferences for partners carrying ‘god genes’ in wild house mice. Animal Behaviour, 31, 325 333.
  • 77
    Lenington S (1991) The t complex: a story of genes, behavior, and populations. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 20, 51 86.
  • 78
    Lenington S & Egid K (1985) Female discrimination of male odors correlated with male genotype at the T-locus in Mus musculus: a response to T-locus of H-2 locus variability? Behavioral Genetics, 15, 37 51.
  • 79
    Lenington S & Egid K (1989) Family environment influences female preference for male odors correlated with t complex genotype. Behavioral Genetics, 19, 257 266.
  • 80
    Lenington S, Egid K, Williams J (1988) Analysis of genetic recognition system. Behavioral Genetics, 18, 549 564.
  • 81
    Levine L, Rockwell RF, Grossfield J (1980) Sexual selection in mice. V. Reproductive competition between +/+ and +/tw5 males. American Naturalist, 116, 150 156.
  • 82
    Lyttle TW (1991) Segregation distorters. Annual Review of Genetics, 25, 511 557.
  • 83
    Madsen T, Shine R, Loman J, Håkansson T (1992) Why do female adders copulate so frequently? Nature, London, 355, 440 441.
  • 84
    Mallet J (1993) Speciation, raciation and color pattern evolution in Heliconius butterflies: evidence from hybrid zones. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (ed. HarrisonRG), 226 260. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • 85
    Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, Potts WK (1992) Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature, London, 360, 581 583.
  • 86
    Markow TA (1982) Mating systems of cactophilic Drosophila. In: Ecological Genetics and Evolution: the Cactus-Yeast-Drosophila Model System (eds BarkerJSF, StarmerWT), pp. 273 287. Academic Press, New York.
  • 87
    Markow TA (1997) Assortative fertilization in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 94, 7756 7760.
  • 88
    Markow TA & Martin JF (1993) Inbreeding and developmental stability in a small human-population. Annals of Human Biology, 20, 389 394.
  • 89
    Martin-Villa JM, Longás J, Arnáiz-Villena A (1999) Cyclic expression of HLA class I and II molecules on the surface of purified human spermatozoa and their control by serum inhibin B levels. Biology of Reproduction, 61, 1382 1386.
  • 90
    Matton DP, Nass N, Clarke AE, Newbigin E (1994) Self-incompatibility – how plants avoid illegitimate offspring. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 91, 1992 1997.
  • 91
    Merçot H, Atlan A, Jacques M, Montchamp-Moreau C (1995) Sex-ratio distortion in Drosophila simulans: co-ocurrence of a meiotic drive and a suppressor of drive . Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 8, 283 300.
  • 92
    Mitton JB (1993) Theory and data pertinent to the relationship between heterozygosity and fitness. In: Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (ed. ThornhillNW), pp. 17 41, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • 93
    Møller AP & Alatalo RV (1999) Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 266, 85 91.
  • 94
    Monroy A & Rosati F (1979) The evolution of cell-cell recognition system. Nature, London, 27, 165 166.
  • 95
    Moore T & Haig D (1991) Genomic imprinting in mammalian development — a parental tug-of-war. Trends in Genetics, 7, 45 49.
  • 96
    Mousseau TA & Roff DA (1987) Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity, 59, 181 198.
  • 97
    Newcomer SD, Zeh JA, Zeh DW (1999) Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 96, 10236 10241.
  • 98
    Nicol A & McLaren A (1974) An effect of female genotype on sperm transport in mice. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 39, 421 424.
  • 99
    Nordlander C, Hammarström L, Lindblom B, Smith CIEE (1983) No role of HLA in mate selection. Immunogenetics, 18, 429 431.
  • 100
    Ober C (1999) Studies of HLA, fertility and mate choice in a human isolate. Human Reproduction Update, 5, 103 107.
  • 101
    Ober C, Hyslop T, Elias S, Weitkamp LR, Hauck WW (1998) Human leucocyte antigen matching and fetal loss: a result of a 10-year prospective study. Human Reproduction, 13, 33 38.
  • 102
    Ober C, Weitkamp LR, Cox N et al. (1997) HLA and mate choice in humans. American Journal of Human Genetics, 61, 497 504.
  • 103
    Oka H (1970) Colony specificity in compound ascidians. In: Profiles of Japanese Science and Scientists (ed. YukawaH), pp. 196 206. Kodanska, Tokyo.
  • 104
    Olsson M, Gullberg A, Tegelström H, Madsen T, Shine R (1994) Can female adders multiply? Nature, London, 369, 528.
  • 105
    Olsson M, Shine R, Madsen T, Gullberg A, Tegelström H (1996) Sperm selection by females. Nature, London, 383, 585.
  • 106
    Palumbi SR (1998) Species formation and the evolution of gamete recognition loci. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (eds HowardDJ, BerlocherSH), pp. 271 278. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • 107
    Palumbi SR (1999) All males are not created equal: fertility differences depend on gamete recognition polymorphisms in sea urchins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 96, 12632 12637.
  • 108
    Partridge L (1983) Non-random mating and offspring fitness. In: Mate Choice (ed. BatesonP), pp. 227 256. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • 109
    Paterson S & Pemberton JM (1997) No evidence for major histocompatibility complex-dependent mating patterns in a free-living ruminant population. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 264, 1813 1819.
  • 110
    Patterson C (1985) The recognition concept of species. In: Species and Speciation (ed. VrbaES), pp. 21 29. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, South Africa.
  • 111
    Penn DJ & Potts WK (1998) MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 265, 1299 1306.
  • 112
    Penn DJ & Potts WK (1999) The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. American Naturalist, 153, 145 164.
  • 113
    Pomiankowski A & Hurst LD (1999) Driving sexual preference. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14, 425 426.
  • 114
    Pomiankowski A & Møller AP (1995) A resolution of the lek paradox. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 260, 21 29.
  • 115
    Potts WK, Manning CJ, Wakeland EK (1991) Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature, London, 352, 619 621.
  • 116
    Potts WK, Manning CJ, Wakeland EK (1994) The role of infectious disease, inbreeding, and mating preferences in maintaining MHC diversity: an experimental test. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 346, 369 378.
  • 117
    Pusey A & Wolf M (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 201 206.
  • 118
    Ratti O, Hovi M, Lundberg A, Tegelstrom H, Alatalo RV (1995) Extra-pair paternity and male characteristics in the pied flycatcher. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 419 425.
  • 119
    Reinhold K, Engqvist L, Misof B, Kurtz J (1999) Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 266, 1341 1345.
  • 120
    Rice WR (1996) Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature, London, 381, 232 234.
  • 121
    Rowe L & Houle D (1996) The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 263, 1415 1421.
  • 122
    Rülicke T, Chapuisat M, Homberger FR, Macas E, Wedekind C (1998) MHC-genotype of progeny influenced by parental infection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 265, 711 716.
  • 123
    Rundle HD & Schluter D (1998) Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution, 52, 200 208.
  • 124
    Sætre G, Moum T, Bure S, Král M, Adamjan M, Moreno J (1997) A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature, London, 387, 589 592.
  • 125
    Sans M, Alvarez I, Callegarijacques SM, Salzano FM (1994) Genetic similarity and mate selection in Uruguay. Journal of Biosocial Science, 26, 285 289.
  • 126
    Sato A, Figueroa F, Ohuigin C, Reznick DN, Klein J (1996) Identification of major histocompatibility complex genes in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Immunogenetics, 43, 38 39.
  • 127
    Schacter B, Weitkamp LR, Johnson WE (1984) Parental HLA compatibility, fetal wastage and neural tube defects: evidence for a T/t-like locus in humans. American Journal of Human Genetics, 36, 1082 1091.
  • 128
    Schliewen UK, Tautz D, Paabo S (1994) Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids. Nature, London, 368, 629 632.
  • 129
    Scofield VL, Schlumpberger JM, West LA, Weissman IL (1982) Protochordate allorecognition is controlled by a MHC-like gene system. Nature, London, 295, 499 502.
  • 130
    Shields WM (1982) Philopatry, Inbreeding, and the Evolution of Sex. Sate University of New York Press, Albany.
  • 131
    Silver LM (1985) Mouse t haplotypes. Annual Review of Genetics, 19, 179 208.
  • 132
    Singh PB, Brown RE, Roser B (1987) MHC antigens in urine as olfactory cues. Nature, London, 327, 161 164.
  • 133
    Slade RW & McCallum H (1992) Overdominant vs. frequency-dependent selection and MHC loci. Genetics, 132, 861 862.
  • 134
    Smith DAS, Gordon IJ, Depew LA, Owens DF (1998) Genetics of the butterfly Danaus chrysspus (L.) in a broad hybrid zone, with special reference to sex ratio, polymorphism and intragenomic conflict. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 65, 1 40.
  • 135
    Stockley P & Macdonald DW (1998) Why do female common shrews produce so many offspring? Oikos, 83, 560 566.
  • 136
    Stouthamer R, Breeuwer JAJ, Hurst GDD (1999) Wolbachia pipientis: Microbial manipulator of arthropod reproduction . Annual Review of Microbiology, 53, 71 102.
  • 137
    Takahata N, Satta Y, Klein J (1992) Polymorphism and balancing selection at major histocompatibility complex loci. Genetics, 130, 925 938.
  • 138
    Templeton AR (1986) Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. In: Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity (ed. SouléME), pp. 105 116. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
  • 139
    Templeton AR, Sing CF, Brokaw B (1976) The units of selection in Drosophila mercatorum. I, The interaction of selection and meiosis in parthenogenetic strains. Genetics, 82, 349 376.
  • 140
    Thorneycroft HBA (1976) A cytogenetic study of the white-throated sparrow, Zonotrichia albicollis (Gmelin). Evolution, 29, 611 621.
  • 141
    Thornhill NW (1993) Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • 142
    Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly. Harpobittacus Nigriceps. American Naturalist, 122, 765 788.
  • 143
    Tregenza T & Butlin RK (1999) Speciation without isolation. Nature, London, 400, 311 312.
  • 144
    Tregenza T & Wedell N (1997) Natural selection bias? Nature, London, 386, 234.
  • 145
    Tregenza T & Wedell N (1998) Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution, 52, 1726 1730.
  • 146
    Van Der Ven, Fimmers R, Engels G, Van Der Ven H, Krebs D (2000) Evidence for major histocompatibility complex-mediated effects on spermatogenesis in humans. Human Reproduction, 15, 189 196.
  • 147
    Von Schantz T, Göransson G, Andersson G et al. (1989) Female choice selects for a viability-based male trait in pheasants. Nature, London, 337, 166 169.
  • 148
    Von Schantz T, Wittzell H, Göransson G, Grahn M, Persson K (1996) MHC genotype and male ornamentation: genetic evidence for the Hamilton-Zuk model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 263, 265 271.
  • 149
    Ward PI (1998) A possible explanation for cryptic female choice in the yellow dung fly, Scathophaga stercoraria (L.). Ethology, 104, 97 110.
  • 150
    Waser NM (1993) Population structure, optimal outbreeding, and assortative mating in angiosperms. In: Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (ed. ThornhillNW), pp. 173 199, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • 151
    Watt WB, Carter PA, Donohue K (1986) Females’ choice of ‘good genotypes’ as mates is promoted by an insect mating system. Science, 233, 1187 1190.
  • 152
    Wedekind C, Chapuisat M, Macas E, Rülicke T (1996) Non-random fertilization in mice correlates with MHC and something else. Heredity, 77, 400 409.
  • 153
    Wedekind C & Füri S (1997) Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proceeding of the Royal Society of London Series B, 264, 1471 1479.
  • 154
    Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke A (1995) MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London Series B, 260, 245 249.
  • 155
    Weitkamp LR & Ober C (1998) HLA and mate choice. American Journal of Human Genetics, 62, 986 987.
  • 156
    Weitkamp LR & Ober C (1999) Ancestral and recombinant 16-locus HLA haplotypes in the Hutterites. Immunogenetics, 49, 491 497.
  • 157
    Wenink PW, Groen AF, Roelke-Parker ME, Prins HTH (1998) African buffalo maintain high genetic diversity in the major histocompatibility complex in spite of historically known population bottlenecks. Molecular Ecology, 7, 1315 1322.
  • 158
    Wilkinson GS, Presgraves DC, Crymes L (1998) Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature, London, 391, 276 279.
  • 159
    Williams EG, Clarke AE, Knox BR (1994) Genetic Control of Self-Incompatibility and Reproductive Development in Flowering Plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
  • 160
    Williams J & Lenington S (1993) Environmental and genetic factors affecting preferences of female house mice (Mus domesticus) for males that differ in t-complex genotype . Behavioral Genetics, 23, 51 58.
  • 161
    Wilson N, Tubman SC, Eady PE, Robertson GW (1997) Female genotype affects male success in sperm competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 264, 1491 1495.
  • 162
    Wittzell H, Madsen H, Westerdahl H, Shine R, Von Schantz T (1999) MHC variation in birds and reptiles. Genetica, 104, 301 309.
  • 163
    Yamaguchi M, Yamazaki K, Boyse EA (1978) Mating preference tests with recombinant congenic strain BALB. HTG*. Immunogenetics, 6, 261 264.
  • 164
    Yamazaki K, Beuchamp GK, Kupniewski D et al. (1988) Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences. Science, 240, 1331 1332.
  • 165
    Yamazaki K, Boyse EA, Miké V et al. (1976) Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 144, 1324 1335.
  • 166
    Yamazaki K, Yamaguchi M, Andrews PW, Peake B, Boyse EA (1978) Mating preferences of F2 segregants of crosses between MHC-congenic mouse strains. Immunogenetics, 6, 253 259.
  • 167
    Zavazava N & Eggert F (1997) MHC and behaviour. Immunology Today, 18, 8 10.
  • 168
    Zeh JA (1997) Polyandry and enhanced reproductive success in the harlequin-beetle-riding pseudoscorpion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 111 118.
  • 169
    Zeh JA & Zeh DW (1996) The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 263, 1711 1717.
  • 170
    Zeh JA & Zeh DW (1997) The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences, 264, 69 75.