Abstract
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Results
- Discussion
- Experimental procedures
- Acknowledgements
- References
Five single alanine substitution mutations in the Spo0F response regulator gave rise to mutant strains of Bacillus subtilis with seemingly normal sporulation that nevertheless rapidly segregated variants blocked in sporulation. The basis for this deregulated phenotype was postulated to be increased phosphorylation of the Spo0A transcription factor, resulting from enhanced phosphate input or decreased dephosphorylation of the phosphorelay. Strains bearing two of these Spo0F mutant proteins, Y13A and I17A, retained a requirement for KinA and KinB kinases in sporulation, whereas the remaining three, L66A, I90A and H101A, gave strains that sporulated well in the absence of both KinA and KinB. Sporulation of strains bearing L66A and H101A mutations was decreased in a mutant lacking KinA, KinB and KinC, but the strain bearing the I90A mutation required the further deletion of KinD to lower its sporulation frequency. The affected residues, L-66, I-90 and H-101, are involved in crucial hydrophobic contacts stabilizing the orientation of helix α4 of Spo0F. The data are consistent with the notion that these three mutations alter the conformation of the β4–α4 loop of Spo0F that is known to contain residues critical for KinA:Spo0F recognition. As this loop has a propensity for multiple conformations, the spatial arrangement of this loop may play a critical role in kinase selection by Spo0F and might be altered by regulatory molecules interacting with Spo0F.
Introduction
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Results
- Discussion
- Experimental procedures
- Acknowledgements
- References
Sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is a developmental process initiated in response to environmental, metabolic and cell cycle signals. While the nature of these signals is still unknown, the mechanism by which they are interpreted and transduced to activate developmental transcription is becoming understood. The key transcription factor for sporulation, Spo0A, is activated by phosphorylation through a pathway termed the phosphorelay (Burbulys et al., 1991). The phosphorelay is a signal transduction system closely related to the two-component systems known to be a major means by which bacteria recognize and respond to environmental signals (Stock et al., 1989; Parkinson and Kofoid, 1992). Under laboratory conditions, signal input in sporulation results from the action of two kinases, KinA and KinB (Trach and Hoch, 1993). These kinases phosphorylate a single-domain response regulator Spo0F that serves as a substrate for phosphorylation of Spo0A by means of the Spo0B phosphotransferase. The enhanced complexity of the phosphorelay is designed to allow supplemental signal input (Burbulys et al., 1991). Signals antithetical to sporulation are processed by phosphatases that dephosphorylate either Spo0F∼P (Perego et al., 1994) or Spo0A∼P (Ohlsen et al., 1994). In addition, KinA is regulated by an anti-kinase, which is in turn controlled by an anti-anti-kinase (Wang et al., 1997). The probability that sporulation will occur in any cell is determined by competition between signal input from the kinases and signal cancellation by the phosphatases (Perego and Hoch, 1996; Perego et al., 1996; Perego, 1998). Thus, the phosphorelay serves as the core of a larger signal integration circuit (Ohlsen et al., 1994).
Mutations in the Spo0A transcription factor that allow the cell to bypass the phosphorelay and initiate sporulation in the absence of Spo0F or Spo0B are known (Sharrock et al., 1984; Hoch et al., 1985; Shoji et al., 1988). These mutations occur in the phospho-acceptor domain of Spo0A and allow direct phosphorylation by other cellular kinases (Spiegelman et al., 1990; Kobayashi et al., 1995; LeDeaux and Grossman, 1995). As these mutations bypass all of the checks and balances that the phosphorelay provides, such mutants have a propensity to accumulate additional mutations that block sporulation entirely (Spiegelman et al., 1990). In this study, the biochemical basis for mutations in Spo0F that give rise to phenotypes similar to bypass mutants of Spo0A was determined.
Discussion
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Results
- Discussion
- Experimental procedures
- Acknowledgements
- References
The Spo0F mutant residues responsible for altered kinase specificity are clustered at a common interface distant from the active site, i.e. the aspartyl pocket (Fig. 3). Residues L-66, I-90 and H-101 are located on α-helix 3, α-helix 4 and β-strand 5 respectively. Each residue makes important van der Waals' contacts between these structure elements. L-66 is one of the two α3 residues making hydrophobic contacts (with S-93) at the interface of α3 and α4, and it is completely buried. The hydrophobic packing between H-101 and I-90 is the sole interaction between the β5 strand and the α4 helix. The imidazole ring of H-101 has been observed to exist in two conformations: one that is buried under the β4–α4 loop; and the other being more solvent exposed (Feher et al., 1997). An aromatic residue always occupies the residue equivalent to H-101 of Spo0F in other response regulators. Y-106, the H-101 equivalent of CheY, has been shown to occupy two conformations and has been implicated in post-phosphorylation activation of CheY (Zhu et al., 1997).
All of these residues are involved in the crucial hydrophobic contacts that stabilize the orientation of helix α4. The structure of this helix is consequential to the conformation of the β4–α4 loop, and the changes caused by mutations at residues 66, 90 and 101 would be likely to propagate to the loop. Residues on this loop (Y-84, E-86 and L-87) have been shown to be critical for KinA:Spo0F recognition. Alanine substitution for any one of them diminished this interaction (Tzeng and Hoch, 1997). Mutations in the β4–α4 loop or in helix 4 of PhoB of Escherichia coli were found greatly to enhance the rate of phosphorylation of PhoB by the VanS kinase of Enterococcus faecium (Haldimann et al., 1996). The structure of this loop may be of general importance in kinase–response regulator interaction. As has been pointed out previously (Feher et al., 1998), this is a region with propensity for multiple conformations and with sensitivity to aspartyl pocket perturbation. Spo0F may take advantage of this structural flexibility to accommodate specific recognition with each kinase involved in sporulation initiation. Additionally, I-90 and H-101 are partially surface exposed; truncation of these residues to alanine may reduce steric barriers to allow the binding of additional kinases.
Despite the clustering of the three alanine mutations at a common area, there were subtle variations in structural perturbations mediated through these mutations. Modification of residues H-101 and I-90, which interact with each other according to the structure, showed dissimilar selectivity towards kinases: Spo0F(H101A) was phosphorylated by KinC but not KinD, while KinD was active on Spo0F(I90A).
The effects of the Spo0F mutations were to gain activity for kinases that do not normally play a significant role in sporulation. The single kinase deletion studies suggested that the gaining of new specificities did not greatly diminish activity with KinA. Interestingly, the PhoB mutations that allowed enhanced VanS activity did not diminish PhoR activity and, in some cases, increased it (Haldimann et al., 1996). The KinC and KinD kinases have much in common with KinA and KinB. All these kinases are orphans whose genes are not linked to a response regulator gene and, therefore, their targets for phosphorylation are not obvious. All these kinases are also grouped together in kinase group IIIB, the basis for which is homology around the histidine residue that becomes phosphorylated (Fabret et al., 1999). As the histidine region is certain to make intimate contact with the response regulator active site during the phosphotransfer reaction, the amino acids surrounding the histidine are likely to be a major contributor to the specificity of interaction with the response regulator.
What then do these kinases normally do in the cell, as in the laboratory they do not contribute significantly to sporulation? It is clear that they are expressed and are active enough to suppress the loss of KinA and KinB in certain Spo0F mutants. Therefore, the signal input into these kinases must be sufficient to stimulate autophosphorylation and phosphotransfer despite the poor activity of KinC and KinD on Spo0F and its mutants relative to KinA. Several possibilities exist to explain the apparent paradox of these three Spo0F mutations. The mutations may stabilize the phosphorylated form of Spo0F, allowing low-level phosphorylation by weakly active kinases to suppress the loss of KinA and KinB. This might occur through resistance to dephosphorylation by phosphatase or other enzymes in vivo that is not obvious from the unchanged sensitivity of the mutant phosphorylated Spo0F proteins to RapB phosphatase or to spontaneous dephosphorylation (Tzeng et al., 1998) (Y.-L. Tzeng, unpublished data). Another possibility was suggested from the results. As the loops surrounding the active-site aspartates of Spo0F are highly dynamic and the consequence of the alteration of several buried residues may be a conformational alteration or stabilization of a unique configuration of the β4–α4 loop, perhaps such changes could normally be induced by ligand interactions between Spo0F and specific small molecules or proteins produced under different environmental conditions. Thus, KinC or KinD productive interaction with Spo0F would depend upon Spo0F adopting a configuration allowing interaction, and this configuration could be a result of specific ligands.
Assuming the equilibrium between various conformations of Spo0F is the actual determinant of kinase specificity, cellular environmental conditions may determine the equilibrium and therefore the most productive kinase. Sporulation in laboratory media is certainly not an environment these cells evolved to encounter, and the observed dominance of KinA may be unique to such conditions. Perhaps in the soil or other natural environments, others of this kinase family are more important.