Abstract
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Material and methods
- 13C-octanoic acid breath test
- 14C-aminopyrine breath test
- Healthy volunteers
- Patient groups
- Cross-sectional study
- Prospective study in TIPS patients
- Biochemical analyses
- Statistics
- Results
- Patients with cirrhosis vs healthy controls
- Effect of the TIPS procedure on OBT and ABT
- Discussion
- Acknowledgments
- References
Abstract As an octanoic acid 13CO2 breath test is frequently used to test gastric emptying of solid food, the purpose of the present study was to study whether oxidative breakdown of octanoic acid is affected by severe liver disease. The design of our study was twofold. First, cirrhotic patients (n = 82) of varying severity were compared with healthy controls (n = 17). Values of half-time, time point of maximal expiration and cumulative recovery of octanoic acid breath tests (OBT) were not significantly different between them. Secondly, cirrhotic patients (n = 10) were studied before placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, 4–7 days later and 1–2 months later. Values of half-time, time point of maximal expiration and cumulative recovery of consecutive OBTs did not change significantly. The OBT may therefore be a suitable test in the future to detect delayed gastric emptying of solids in cirrhotic patients with reduced liver function and portal hypertension.
Introduction
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Material and methods
- 13C-octanoic acid breath test
- 14C-aminopyrine breath test
- Healthy volunteers
- Patient groups
- Cross-sectional study
- Prospective study in TIPS patients
- Biochemical analyses
- Statistics
- Results
- Patients with cirrhosis vs healthy controls
- Effect of the TIPS procedure on OBT and ABT
- Discussion
- Acknowledgments
- References
Octanoic acid is a medium-chain fatty acid consisting of eight carbon atoms. The 13C-octanoic acid breath test (OBT) has been validated and used to measure gastric emptying rate of solids.1,2 This 13CO2-breath test is a non-invasive and safe gastric motility test and can be easily repeated over short periods of time.1,2 The use of OBT for gastric motility disorders depends on gastric emptying rate which is the rate-limiting step of this test. It is largely unknown whether liver diseases affect metabolic handling of octanoic acid. The impact of liver impairment on the OBT is relevant in view of possible gastric motility problems observed in patients with cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension.3,4 OBT ‘baseline’ values for cirrhotic patients are needed.
Octanoic acid has the advantage that it is rapidly absorbed, oxidized and eliminated as CO2 in the breath. The intestinal mucosa absorbs octanoic acid without previous incorporation in micelles.5 Non-esterified and albumin bound, octanoic acid is transported via the portal vein directly to the liver.5,6 Hepatocytes preferentially oxidize it to acetyl-CoA and CO2 in mitochondria7 and, subsequently, CO2 is eliminated in the breath.8,9 Orally administered long-chain fatty acids exhibit a far more complex route and metabolic handling and are therefore less traceable in the breath.8–10 Not surprisingly, hepatic uptake and oxidation of octanoic acid measured by positron emission tomography, was proposed as a new liver function test and imaging tool.11
The aim of the present study therefore was to investigate whether oxidative breakdown of octanoic acid may be affected in patients with cirrhosis and in portosystemic shunting.
Prospective study in TIPS patients
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Material and methods
- 13C-octanoic acid breath test
- 14C-aminopyrine breath test
- Healthy volunteers
- Patient groups
- Cross-sectional study
- Prospective study in TIPS patients
- Biochemical analyses
- Statistics
- Results
- Patients with cirrhosis vs healthy controls
- Effect of the TIPS procedure on OBT and ABT
- Discussion
- Acknowledgments
- References
In ten patients undergoing an elective TIPS procedure, OBT and ABT were performed the day before the TIPS placement, 4–7 days later and 1–2 months later. Eight of 10 patients were male and their age was 52 y ± 13 years (mean ± SD). The indication for elective TIPS placement was treatment of refractory ascites (n = 9) or prophylaxis of rebleeding (n = 1). The aetiology of cirrhosis was alcohol (n = 6), alcohol and hepatitis C (n = 1), hepatitis C (n = 2) and Budd–Chiari (n = 1), all of which were histologically confirmed. Five patients belonged to Child–Pugh class B and five to class C. Oesophageal varices were present in eight of 10 patients. Biochemical data are given in Table 2. The TIPS was created and dilated to achieve a reduction of the porta-caval pressure gradient of at least 50%.15 In the first week after TIPS placement, an angiographic control was carried out in all patients to document patency of the TIPS. During this control, additional dilatation and/or stenting was performed in three of 10 patients and in one patient recanalization was carried out for a thrombus in the TIPS.15 Residual porta-caval pressure gradients were then between 2 and 8 mmHg in all. At the time of invasive TIPS control 1–2 months later, no additional angioplasty had to be carried out, because all porta-caval pressure gradients were between 2 and 10 mmHg. OBT and ABT were always carried out before the angiographic procedure of TIPS placement or TIPS control.
Table 2. Characteristics of TIPS patients | (n = 10) | Before TIPS placement | 4–7 days after TIPS placement | 1–2 months after TIPS placement |
|---|
|
| Haemoglobin (g dl−1) | 11.5 (7.8–16.1) | 10.8 (8.7–13.0) | 10.8 (6.9–14.5) |
| Prothrombin time (%) | 66 (42–95) | 55 (39–88) | 58 (28–95) |
| Plasma albumin (g l−1) | 31 (23–36) | 29 (23–38) | 32 (22–42) |
| ALT (U l−1) | 26 (3–50) | 114 (24–348)*,** | 29 (4–84) |
| AST (U l−1) | 47 (8–109) | 98 (41–454)* | 56 (15–143) |
| Bilirubin (mg dl−1) | 1.2 (0.7–4.8) | 1.7 (0.8–6.9) | 1.9 (1.0–8.8)* |
| Creatinine (mg dl−1) | 1.1 (0.7–4.3) | 0.8 (0.6–4.4) | 0.9 (0.6–5.3) |
| Platelet count (109 l−1) | 133 (60–262) | 127 (63–163) | 98 (74–151) |
| Encephalopathy grading (scoring 1–3) | 1 (1–2) | 2 (1–3) | 1 (1–3) |
All patients and healthy volunteers gave their informed consent before entering the study. The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the Faculty of Medicine of Leuven, Belgium.
Patients with cirrhosis vs healthy controls
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Material and methods
- 13C-octanoic acid breath test
- 14C-aminopyrine breath test
- Healthy volunteers
- Patient groups
- Cross-sectional study
- Prospective study in TIPS patients
- Biochemical analyses
- Statistics
- Results
- Patients with cirrhosis vs healthy controls
- Effect of the TIPS procedure on OBT and ABT
- Discussion
- Acknowledgments
- References
The OBT t1/2 was not significantly different between healthy controls and cirrhotic patients: median (range): 88 (60–135) and 96 (68–230) min, respectively (P = 0.19) (Fig. 1a and Table 3). OBT tmax was not significantly different: 38 (21–86) and 40 (14–88) min, respectively (P = 0.65) (Table 3). OBTc was not significantly different neither: 45 (29–80) and 55 (23–100)% dose, respectively (P = 0.38) (Table 3). The 13CO2 expiration curves were reconstructed for each group in Fig. 2, using upper limit (upper line) and lower limit (lower line) of the 95% confidence interval of OBTc. The OBT curve shape showed a small difference in the tail, which was ‘lifted up’ in the liver disease group (Fig. 2). As to aminopyrine, there was a significant difference in ABT 2 h between the Child–Pugh classes (P < 0.01; Table 3). This reflects an impaired microsomal demethylation of aminopyrine in the patients with the most advanced cirrhosis (Fig. 1b).12
Table 3. OBT and ABT in cirrhotic patients | | Healthy controls (n = 17) | Cirrhotic patients (n = 82) | Child–Pugh class |
|---|
| | A (n = 7) | B (n = 30) | C (n = 45) |
|---|
|
| OBT t1/2 (min) | 88 (60–135) | 96 (68–230) | 85 (68–117) | 98 (69–176) | 100 (70–230) |
| OBT tmax (min) | 38 (21–86) | 40 (14–88) | 38 (23–51) | 38 (14–77) | 45 (21–88) |
| OBTc (% dose) | 45 (29–80) | 55 (23–100) | 49 (36–59) | 51 (39–78) | 57 (17–100) |
| ABT 2 h (% dose) | ND | 2 (0–20) | 6 (3–20) | 3 (0–15) | 1 (0–20)* |
In cirrhotic patients, OBT t1/2 was not correlated with Child–Pugh score, plasma albumin, bilirubin or prothrombin time (Table 4) or other biochemical data (not shown). OBT t1/2 did correlate negatively with ABT 2 h (Table 4).
Table 4. Correlations of OBT t1/2 with parameters of liver function in cirrhotic patients | Octanoic acid breath test | Liver function parameter | Correlation coefficient (n = 82) | P -value |
|---|
|
| OBT t1/2 (min) | Child–Pugh score (5–15) | 0.092 | 0.47 |
| OBT t1/2 (min) | Plasma albumin (g l−1) | 0.041 | 0.71 |
| OBT t1/2 (min) | Plasma bilirubin (mg dl−1) | 0.039 | 0.73 |
| OBT t1/2 (min) | Prothrombin time (%) | −0.245 | 0.06 |
| OBT t1/2 (min) | ABT 2 h (% dose) | −0.330 | 0.005 |
Discussion
- Top of page
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Material and methods
- 13C-octanoic acid breath test
- 14C-aminopyrine breath test
- Healthy volunteers
- Patient groups
- Cross-sectional study
- Prospective study in TIPS patients
- Biochemical analyses
- Statistics
- Results
- Patients with cirrhosis vs healthy controls
- Effect of the TIPS procedure on OBT and ABT
- Discussion
- Acknowledgments
- References
Cirrhotic patients can develop delayed gastric emptying, independent of possible concomitant diabetes mellitus.3 The presence and/or endoscopic treatment of oesophageal and gastric varices might disturb gastric emptying rate, although reported data are conflicting.3,4 Delayed gastric emptying can lead to malnutrition, which is a serious problem in the case of cirrhosis.5,14 Gastric emptying rate is measured by Tc*-scintigraphy or, alternatively, by OBT, as has been validated and previously discussed.1,2,16 Both examinations are considered standard methods for detection of delayed gastric emptying.16 The present OBT has the advantage over radioactive isotope studies in that it can be easily and safely repeated. Therefore, OBT was preferred in the present investigation.
The ‘postgastric processing’ of octanoic acid in OBT is measurable as 13CO2 enrichment in the breath,1,13 but the impact of liver function has not been studied before in adults.17 We quantified in cirrhotic patients the impaired degree of liver function by the Child–Pugh score14 and the microsomal liver breath test ABT.12 Both parameters are most frequently used to assess the degree of cirrhosis.18,19
At time point +∞, cumulative 13CO2 recovery in the breath after oral octanoic acid intake was approximately 50% of the administered dose in healthy volunteers (Table 3).2 Tracer recovery cannot be 100% because some metabolic steps and C1-pooling do not fully lead to CO2 expiration.9 In an ABT, 14CO2 recovery after oral aminopyrine intake is much lower and approximates 20%.20
In the first part of this study, we could not find a statistically significant difference between healthy controls and cirrhotic patients as to the parameters OBT t1/2, OBT tmax or OBTc. Apart from six of 82 cirrhotic patients who had a high OBT t1/2 outside the range of healthy controls, data in both groups overlapped. Intriguingly, two correlations between OBT t1/2 and liver function tests were observed (Table 4). First, OBT t1/2 correlated weakly, although significantly, with aminopyrine demethylation. Secondly, OBT t1/2 tended to correlate with the prothrombin time. These two parameters of hepatic microsomal and synthesis function, respectively, may be inversely related to a small delay in OBT t1/2. Additionally a light change in the shape of the 13CO2 expiration curves occurred in cirrhotic patients (Fig. 2). Yet, despite small OBT changes in cirrhotic patients, the Child–Pugh score, which combines five liver parameters,14 definitely did not correlate with OBT t1/2. This indicates that liver function impairment as such did not delay OBT t1/2, which mostly overlapped with healthy control data, as mentioned before. In clinical practice, this offers a likely argument, in our opinion, to ascribe a delayed OBT t1/2 in a cirrhotic individual to delayed gastric emptying and not to his liver function impairment.
We acknowledge a limitation of this study, namely that a Tc*-scintigraphy was not performed together with an OBT21 in this large patient group. This would have corroborated our findings. On a whole, our observations suggest maintenance of octanoic acid oxidative breakdown in the case of severe liver impairment. At first, it was believed that, in cirrhotic patients, hepatic uptake and β-oxidation of (all) fatty acids increased.5 This was considered a necessary energy supply in a hypermetabolic state.5 Recently, normal22 or low23 hepatic fatty acid extraction rates were observed in cirrhotic subjects. More methodological comparisons are certainly needed to clarify this problem of hepatic uptake ànd β-oxidation. An important element to take into account in this respect is the length of the carbon chain of the fatty acid. Hepatic β-oxidation of fatty acids in healthy men augment indeed with shorter carbon chains.8,9 So was, after an oral gift, cumulative 13CO2 breath recovery three times higher for 12 : 0 than 18 : 0 carbon fatty acids (41 ± 7 vs 13 ± 5%).9 Our data demonstrated a rather high recovery for octanoic acid in both healthy controls and cirrhotic patients. This suggests an extraction and oxidative breakdown of octanoic acid as efficient in cirrhosis as in healthy condition.
In the TIPS of the present study, we studied the influence of reduced portal vein supply to the liver. The portal vein is the main road of absorbed octanoic acid. During TIPS follow-up, there were no significant changes in OBT parameters, despite a worsening of aminopyrine demethylation. The OBT tmax tended to be later, 1–2 months after TIPS at a time point when none of the 10 patients had portal hypertension anymore (no patient required TIPS manipulations). More haemodynamic studies in cirrhotic and portal hypertensive patients are required to interpret possible changes in the shape of OBT curves. In general, because TIPS derives portal venous blood away from the liver24 and OBT t1/2 was similar after TIPS placement, this again may support the concept that the liver efficiently removes octanoic acid from the circulation.6,11 Another possible explanation would be that extrahepatic metabolism of octanoic acid takes place or takes over after TIPS placement. Adipose tissue does not store medium-chain fatty acids (in contrast to long-chain fatty acids) but rather oxidizes them.6 More specifically, extrahepatic metabolism of octanoic acid has been described.11 After intravenous injection of radioactive labelled octanoic acid to rodents, liver, kidney, heart and other organs were found to take up octanoic acid.11 Hepatic and extrahepatic oxidative breakdown of octanoic acid are therefore not mutually exclusive. Whether small changes in the shape of OBT curves in cirrhotic patients are the result of extrahepatic oxidative breakdown is speculative and remains inconclusive in our study. Oral administration of octanoic acid in liquid form, as in our study, challenged hepatic uptake in the first place. Sufficient uptake and oxidative breakdown of octanoic acid by the liver and possibly other organs is an additional argument to use OBT as a gastric motility test in clinical practice. In our ten TIPS patients, our study had enough power to measure reduced microsomal liver function (ABT) after TIPS. These cirrhotic patients belonged to Child B and C classes – almost all were haemodynamically decompensated. Microsomal liver function can indeed worsen after TIPS placement as reported in decompensated cirrhotic patients25 but does not need to worsen in patients with less advanced cirrhosis.26
In conclusion, OBT t1/2, an important parameter to quantify gastric emptying rate, was not changed by the presence and severity of cirrhosis. A TIPS derivation of portal perfusion of the liver did not affect octanoic acid oxidative breakdown despite diminution of microsomal liver function. The OBT may therefore be a suitable test in the future to detect delayed gastric emptying of solids in cirrhotic patients with reduced liver function and portal hypertension.