SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Barradas V.L. & Jones H.G. (1996) Responses of CO2 assimilation to changes in irradiance: laboratory and field data and a model for beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Experimental Biology 47, 639645.
  • Chen H.Y.H. & Klinka K. (1997) Light availability and photosynthesis of Pseudotsuga menziesii seedlings grown in the open and in the forest understory. Tree Physiology 17, 2329.
  • Davies W.J. & Kozlowski T.T. (1974) Stomatal responses of five woody angiosperms to light intensity and humidity. Canadian Journal of Botany 52, 15251535.
  • Davies W.J. & Kozlowski T.T. (1975) Stomatal responses to changes in light intensity as influenced by plant water stress. Forest Science 21, 129133.
  • DeLucia E.H. (1987) The effect of freezing nights on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and internal CO2 concentration in seedlings of Engelmann spruce (Picea Engelmannii Parry). Plant, Cell and Environment 10, 333338.
  • Field C.B., Ball J.T. & Berry J.A. (1991) Photosynthesis: principles and field techniques. In Plant Physiological Ecology. Field Methods and Instrumentation (eds R. W.Pearcy, J. R.Ehleringer, H. A.Mooney & P. W.Rundel), pp. 209253. Chapman and Hall, London , U.K.
  • Fites J.A. & Teskey R.O. (1988) CO2 and water vapor exchange of Pinus taeda in relation to stomatal behavior: test of an optimization hypothesis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17, 150157.
  • Hook W.R., Livingston N.J., Sun Z.J. & Hook P.B. (1992) Remote diode shorting improves measurement of soil water by time domain reflectometry. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56, 13841391.
  • Jarvis P.G. (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in field. Philosophical Transcripts of the Royal Society of London, Series B 273, 593610.
  • Jarvis P.G., James G.B. & Landsberg J.J. (1976) Coniferous forest. In Vegetation and the Atmosphere, Vol. 2. Case Studies (ed. J. L.Monteith), pp. 171240. Academic Press, London , UK .
  • Jones H.G. (1992) Plants and Microclimate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge , U.K.
  • Kirschbaum M.U.K. & Pearcy R.W. (1988a) Gas exchange analysis of the relative importance of stomatal and biochemical factors in photosynthetic induction in Alocasia macrorrhiza. Plant Physiology 86, 782785.
  • Kirschbaum M.U.K. & Pearcy R.W. (1988b) Gas exchange analysis of the fast phase of photosynthetic induction in Alocasia macrorrhiza. Plant Physiology 87, 818821.
  • Kirschbaum M.U.K., Gross L.J. & Pearcy R.W. (1988) Observed and modelled stomatal responses to dynamic light environments in the shade plant Alocasia macrorrhiza. Plant, Cell and Environment 11, 111121.
  • Knapp A.K. (1992) Leaf gas exchange in Quercus macrocarpa (Fagaceae): rapid stomatal responses to variability in sunlight in a tree growth form. American Journal of Botany 76, 599604.
  • Knapp A.K. (1993) Gas exchange dynamics in C3 and C4 grasses: consequences of differences in stomatal conductance. Ecology 74, 113123.
  • Knapp A.K & Smith W.K. (1988) Effect of water stress on stomatal and photosynthetic responses in subalpine plants to cloud patterns. American Journal of Botany 75, 851858.
  • Knapp A.K & Smith W.K. (1989) Influence of growth form on eco-physiological responses to variable sunlight in subalpine plants. Ecology 70, 10691082.
  • Kramer P.J. & Kozlowski T.T. (1979) Physiology of Woody Plants. Academic Press, San Diego , CA , USA .
  • Livingston N.J. (1994) A feedback control system for the precise and continuous regulation of photosynthetic photon flux density. Plant, Cell and Environment 17, 111114.
  • Livingston N.J. & Black T.A. (1987) Stomatal characteristics and transpiration of conifer seedlings planted on a south-faced clear-cut. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17, 12731282.
  • Livingston N.J., Davies G.J., Eby B.M., Filek G., Fuchs E.E., Pepin S. & Percy R.E. (1994) A whole-plant cuvette system to measure short-term responses of conifer seedlings to environmental change. Tree Physiology 14, 759768.
  • Meinzer F.C. (1982a) The effect of vapor pressure on stomatal control of gas exchange in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) saplings. Oecologia 54, 236242.
  • Ng P.A.P. & Jarvis P.G. (1980) Hysteresis in the response of stomatal conductance in Pinus sylvestris L. needles to light: observations and a hypothesis. Plant, Cell and Environment 3, 207216.
  • Pearcy R.W., Chazdon R.L., Gross L.J. & Mott K.A. (1994) Photosynthetic utilization of sunflecks: a temporally patchy resource on a time scale of seconds to minutes. In Exploitation of Environment Heterogeneity by Plants (eds M. M.Caldwell & R. W.Pearcy), pp. 175208. Academic Press, New York .
  • Pearcy R.W., Gross L.J. & He D. (1997) An improved dynamic model of photosynthesis of carbon gain in sunfleck light regimes. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 411424.
  • Pereira J.S. & Kozlowski T.T. (1977) Influence of light intensity, temperature, and leaf area on stomatal aperture and water potential of woody plants. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 7, 145153.
  • Pfitsch W.A. & Pearcy R.W. (1989) Steady-state and dynamic photosynthetic response of Adenocaulon bicolor in its redwood forest habitat. Oecologia 80, 471476.
  • Seemann J.R., Kirschbaum M.U.F., Sharkey T.D. & Pearcy R.W. (1988) Regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity in Alocasia macrorrhiza in response to step changes in irradiance. Plant Physiology 88, 148152.
  • Taiz L. & Zeiger E. (1991) Plant Physiology. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing, Redwood City , CA , USA .
  • Teskey R.O., Fites J.A., Samuelson L.J. & Bongarten B.C. (1986) Stomatal and nonstomatal limitations to assimilation in Pinus taeda L. under different environmental conditions. Tree Physiology 2, 131142.
  • Tinoco-Ojanguren C. & Pearcy R.W. (1993a) Stomatal dynamics and its importance to carbon gain in two rainforest Piper species I. D effects on the transient stomatal response to lightflecks. Oecologia 94, 388394.
  • Tinoco-Ojanguren C. & Pearcy R.W. (1993b) Stomatal dynamics and its importance to carbon gain in two rainforest Piper species II. Stomatal versus biochemical limitations during photosynthetic induction. Oecologia 94, 395402.
  • Watts W.R. & Neilson R.E. (1978) Photosynthesis in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) VIII. Measurements of stomatal conductance and 14CO2 uptake in controlled environments. Journal of Applied Ecology 15, 245255.
  • Whitehead D. & Teskey R.O. (1995) Dynamic response of stomata to changing irradiance in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Physiology 15, 245251.
  • Whitehead D., Livingston N.J., Kelliher F.M., Hogan K.P., Pepin S., McSeveny T.M. & Byers J.N. (1996) Response of transpiration and photosynthesis to a transient change in illuminated foliage area for a Pinus radiata D. Don tree. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 949957.
  • Woodrow I.E. & Mott K.A. (1989) Rate limitation of non-steady-state photosynthesis by ribulose 1,5-biphosphale carboxylase in spinach. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 16, 487500.
  • Woods D.B. & Turner N.C. (1971) Stomatal response to changing light by four tree species of varying shade tolerance. New Phytologist 70, 7784.
  • Young D.R. & Smith W.K. (1979) Influence of sunflecks on the temperature and water relations of two subalpine understory congeners. Oecologia 43, 195205.