SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Amthor J.S. (1994) Scaling CO2-photosynthesis relationships from the leaf to the canopy. Photosynthesis Research 39, 321350.
  • Anderson M.C., Norman J.M., Meyers T.P. & Diak G.R. (2000) An analytical model for estimating canopy transpiration and carbon assimilation fluxes based on canopy light-use efficiency. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 101, 265289.
  • Assmann S.M. (1999) The cellular basis of guard cell sensing to rising CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment 22, 629637.
  • Baldocchi D. & Meyers T. (1998) On using eco-physiological, micrometeorological and biogeochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace gas fluxes over vegetation: a perspective. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 90, 125.
  • Ball J.T., Woodrow I.E. & Berry J.A. (1987) A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In Progress in Photosynthesis Research (ed. I.Biggens), pp. 221224. Martinus-Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Beadle C.L., Talbot H., Neilson R.E. & Jarvis P.R. (1985) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis in a mature Scots pine forest. III. Variation in canopy conductance and canopy photosynthesis. Journal of Applied Ecology 22, 587595.
  • Blatt M.R. (2000) Cellular signaling and Volume control in stomatal movements in plants. Annual Review of Cell Development Biology 16, 221241.
  • Bond B. & Kavanagh K.L. (1999) Stomatal behavior of four woody species in relation to leaf-specific hydraulic conductance and threshold water potential. Tree Physiology 19, 503510.
  • Brodribb T. (1996) Dynamics of changing intercellular CO2 concentration (ci) during drought and determination of minimum functional ci. Plant Physiology 111, 179185.
  • Buckley T.N. & Mott K.A. (2002) Stomatal water relations and the control of hydraulic supply and demand. Progress in Botany 63, 309325.
  • Calvet J.-C., Noilhan J., Roujean J.-L., Bessemoulin P., Cabelguenne M., Olioso A. & Wigneron J.-P. (1998) An interactive SVAT model tested against data from six contrasting sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 92, 7395.
  • Campbell G.S. (1985) Soil Physics with Basic: Transport Models for Soil-Plant Systems. Elsevier. Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Choudhury B.J. & Monteith J.L. (1988) A four-layer model for the heat budget of homogeneous land surfaces. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 114, 373398.
  • Collatz G.J., Ball J.T., Grivet C. & Berry J.A. (1991) Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 54, 107136.
  • Comstock J. & Mencuccini M. (1998) Control of stomatal conductance by leaf water potential in Hymenoclea salsola (T. & G.), a desert shrub. Plant, Cell and Environment 21, 10291038.
  • Cowan I.R. (1965) Transport of water in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. Journal of Applied Ecology 2, 221239.
  • Cowan I.R. (1977) Stomatal behaviour and environment. Advances in Botanical Research 4, 117228.
  • Denmead O.T. & Shaw R.H. (1962) Availability of soil water to plants as affected by soil moisture content and meteorological conditions. Agronomy Journal 54, 385390.
  • DePury D.G.G. & Farquhar G.D. (1997) Simple scaling of photsynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 537557.
  • Dewar R.C. (2002) The Ball-Berry-Leuning and Tardieu-Davies models: synthesis and extension at guard cell level. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 13831398.
  • Eamus D., Myers B., Duff G. & Williams D. (1999) Seasonal changes in photsynthesis of eight savanna tree species. Tree Physiology 19, 665671.
  • Eamus D., Hutley L.B. & O'Grady A.P. (2001) Daily and seasonal patterns of carbon and water fluxes above a north Australian savanna. Tree Physiology 21, 977988.
  • Farquhar G.D. (1978) Feedforward responses of stomata to humidity. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 5, 787800.
  • Farquhar G.D. & Wong S.C. (1984) An empirical model of stomatal conductance. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11, 191210.
  • Farquhar G.D., Caemmerer von S. & Berry J.A. (1980) A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 7890.
  • Forseth I.N. & Ehleringer J.R. (1983) Ecopyhsiology of two solar tracking desert winter annuals III. Gas exchange responses to light, CO2 and VPD in relation to long-term drought. Oecologia 57, 344351.
  • Franks P.J., Buckley T.N., Shope J.C. & Mott K.A. (2001) Guard cell Volume and pressure measured concurrently by confocal microscopy and the cell pressure probe. Plant Physiology 125, 15771584.
  • Gardner W.R. (1960) Dynamic aspects of water availability to plants. Soil Science 89, 6373.
  • Giorio P., Sorrentino G. & D’Andria R. (1999) Stomatal behaviour, leaf water status and photsynthetic response of field-grown olive trees under water deficit. Environmental and Experimental Botany 42, 95104.
  • Grant R.F., Wall G.W., Kimball B.A., Frumau K.F.A., Pinter P.J. Jr, Hunsaker D.J. & Lamorte R.L. (1999) Crop water relations under different CO2 and irrigation: testing of ecosys with the free air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) experiment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 95, 2751.
  • Harley P.C., Thomas R.B., Reynolds J.F. & Strain B.R. (1992) Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment 15, 271282.
  • Henson I.E., Jensen C.R. & Turner N.C. (1989) Leaf gas exchange and water relations of lupins and wheat. I. Shoot response to soil water deficits. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 16, 401413.
  • Inoue E. (1963) On the turbulent structure of airflow within crop canopies. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan 41, 317326.
  • Jarvis P.G. (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biology Sciences 273, 593610.
  • Jensen C.R., Svendsen H., Andersen M.N. & Lösch R. (1993) Use of the root contact concept, an empirical leaf conductance model and pressure-volume curves in simulating crop water relations. Plant and Soil 149, 126.
  • Jones H.G. & Sutherland R.A. (1991) Stomatal control of xylem embolism. Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 607612.
  • Leuning R. (1990) Modelling stomatal behavior and photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grandis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 17, 159175.
  • Leuning R. (1995) A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 339355.
  • Leuning R. (1997) Scaling to a common temperature improves the correlation between photosynthesis parameters Jmax and Vcmax. Journal of Experimental Botany 307, 345347.
  • Leuning R., Dunin F.X. & Wang Y.-P. (1998) A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy. II. Comparison with measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 91, 113125.
  • Leuning R., Kelliher F.M., DePury D.G.G. & Schulze E.-D. (1995) Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, conductance and transpiration: scaling from leaves to canopies. Plant, Cell and Environment 18, 11831200.
  • Leuning R., Tuzet A. & Perrier A. (2003) Stomata as part of the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum. In Forests at the Land–Atmosphere Interface (eds M.Mencuccini, J.Grace, J.Moncrieff, K.McNaughton). CAB International, Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Lohammer T., Larsson S., Linder S. & Falk S.O. (1980) FAST- Simulation models of gaseous exchange in scots pine. Ecology Bulletin 32, 505523.
  • Maier-Maercker U. (1998) Dynamics of change in stomatal response and water status of Picea abies during a persistent drought period: a contribution to the traditional view of plant water relations. Tree Physiology 18, 211222.
  • Maier-Maercker U. (1999) New light on the importance of peristomatal transpiration. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 26, 916.
  • McMurtrie R.E., Leuning R., Thompson W.A. & Wheeler A.M. (1992) A model of canopy photosynthesis and water use incorporating a mechanistic formulation of leaf CO2 exchange. Forest Ecology and Management 52, 261278.
  • McNaughton K.G. & Jarvis P.G. (1983) Predicting effects of vegetation changes on transpiration and evaporation. In Water Deficits and Plant Growth Vol. 7 (ed. T.T. Kozlowski), pp. 147. Academic Press New York, USA.
  • Meinzer F.C., Andrade J.L., Goldsteein G., Holbrook N.M., Cavelier J. & Jackson P. (1997) Control of transpiration from the upper canopy of a tropical forest: the role of stomatal, boundary layer and hydraulic architecture components. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 12421252.
  • Mencuccini M., Mambelli S. & Comstock J. (2000) Stomatal responsiveness to leaf water status in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a function of time of day. Plant, Cell and Environment 23, 11091118.
  • Mott K.A. (1988) Do stomata respond to CO2 concentrations other than intercellular. Plant Physiology 86, 200203.
  • Mott K.A. & Franks P.J. (2001) The role of epidermal turgor in stomatal interactions following a local perturbation in humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 24, 657662.
  • Mott K.A. & Parkhurst D.F. (1991) Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 509515.
  • Netting A.G. (2000) pH, abscisic acid and the integration of metabolism in plants under stressed and non-stressed conditions: cellular responses to stress and their implication for plant water relations. Journal of Experimental Botany 51, 147158.
  • Norman J.M., Kustas W.P. & Humes K.S. (1995) Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 77, 263293.
  • Olioso A., Carlson T.N. & Brisson N. (1996) Simulation of diurnal transpiration and photosynthseis of a water stressed soybean crop. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 81, 4159.
  • Pereira J.S., Tenhunen J.D. & Lange O.L. (1987) Stomatal control of photosynthesis of Eucalyptus globulus Labill. trees under field conditions in Portugal. Journal of Experimental Botany 38, 16781688.
  • Perrier A. & Tuzet A. (1998) Approche Théorique Du Continuum Sol-Plante-Atmosphère. In Traité d’irrigation (ed. J.R.Tiercelin) Chap. II.4, pp. 112146. Lavoisier, Paris, France.
  • Philip J.R. (1957) Evaporation, and moisture and heat fields in the soil. Journal of Meteorology 14, 354366.
  • Prior L.D., Eamus D. & Duff G.A. (1997) Seasonal and diurnal patterns of carbon assimilation, stomatal conductance and leaf water potential in Eucalyptus tetrodonta saplings in a wet-dry savanna in Northern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 45, 241258.
  • Reid J.B. & Huck M.G. (1990) Diurnal variation of crop hydraulic resistance: a new analysis. Agronomy Journal 82, 827834.
  • Ronda R.J., De Bruin H.A.R. & Holtslag A.A.M. (2001) Representation of the canopy conductance in modelling the surface energy budget for low vegetation. Journal of Applied Meteorology 40, 14311444.
  • Saliendra N.Z., Sperry J.S. & Comstock J.P. (1995) Influence of leaf water status on stomatal response to humidity, hydraulic conductance, and soil drought in Betula occidentalis. Planta 196, 357366.
  • Schulze E.-D. & Hall A.E. (1982) Stomatal responses, water loss and CO2 assimilation rates of plants in contrasting environments. In Physiological Plant Ecology II Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation (eds O.L.Lange, P.S.Nobel, C.B.Osmond, H. ZIegler), pp. 181230. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  • Seginer I. (1971) Wind effect on the evaporation rate. Journal of Applied Meteorology 10, 215220.
  • Sellers P.J., Berry J.A., Collatz G.J., Field C.B. & Hall F.G. (1992) Canopy reflectance, photosynthesis and transpiration. III. A reanalysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme. Remote Sensing of Environment 42, 187216.
  • Sellers P.J., Randall D.A., Collatz G.J., Berry J.A., Field C.B., Dazlich D.A., Zhang C., Collelo G.D. & Bounoua L. (1996) A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMs. Part 1. Model formulation. Journal of Climate 9, 676705.
  • Sifaoui M.S. & Perrier A. (1978) Caractérisation de l’évaporation profonde. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 21, 629637.
  • Sperry J.S. (2000) Hydraulic constraints on plant gas exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 104, 1323.
  • Takagi K., Tsuboya T. & Takahashi H. (1998) Diurnal hystereses of stomatal and bulk surface conductances in ralation to water vapor pressure deficit in cool-temperate wetland. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 91, 177191.
  • Tardieu F. & Davies W.J. (1993) Integration of hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 341349.
  • Tardieu F. & Simonneau T. (1998) Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: Modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Journal of Experimental Botany 49, 419432.
  • Tyree M.T. & Sperry J.S. (1988) Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? Answers from a model. Plant Physiology 88, 574580.
  • Wang Y.P. & Leuning R. (1998) A two-leaf model for canopy conductance, photosynthesis and partitioning of available energy. I. Model description. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 91, 89111.
  • Whitehead D., Walcroft A.S., Griffin K.L., Tissue D.T., Turnbull M.H., Engel V., Brown K.J. & Schuster W.S.F. (2002) Scaling carbon uptake from leaves to canopies: insights from two forests with contrasting properties. Forests at the Land–Atmosphere Interface (in press).
  • Williams M., Rastetter E.B., Fernandes D.N., Goulden M.L., Wofsy S.C., Shaver G.R., Melillo J.M., Munger J.W., Fan S.-M. & Nadelhoffer K.J. (1996) Modelling the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum in a Quercus-Acer stand at Harvard Forest: the regulation of stomatal conductance by light, nitrogen and soil/plant hydraulic conductance. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 911927.
  • Wu H.-I., Sharpe J.H. & Spence R.D. (1985) Stomatal mechanics III: Geometric interpretation of the mechanical advantage. Plant, Cell and Environment 8, 269274.