Statistics Canada information is used with the permission of Statistics Canada. Users are forbidden to copy the data and redisseminate them, in an original or modified form, for commercial purposes, without the expressed permission of Statistics Canada. Information on the availability of the wide range of data from Statistics Canada can be obtained from Statistics Canada's Regional Offices, its World Wide Web site at http://www.statcan.ca, and its toll-free access number 1-800-263-1136.
Using nominal group technique to assess chronic pain, patients' perceived challenges and needs in a community health region
Version of Record online: 21 FEB 2003
Volume 6, Issue 1, pages 44–52, March 2003
How to Cite
Dewar, A., White, M., Posade, S. T. and Dillon, W. (2003), Using nominal group technique to assess chronic pain, patients' perceived challenges and needs in a community health region. Health Expectations, 6: 44–52. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00208.x
PRECEDE is an acronym for predisposing, reinforcing and enabling constructs in educational diagnosis and evaluation. PROCEED is an acronym for new elements in planning, implementation and evaluation and stands for policy, regulatory and organizational constructs in educational and environmental development recognizing that other institutional factors influence behavioural change.
- Issue online: 21 FEB 2003
- Version of Record online: 21 FEB 2003
- Accepted for publication 16 October 2002
- chronic pain;
- needs assessment;
- nominal group technique;
- patient perspectives;
- patient–physician interactions;
- PRECEDE–PROCEED planning model
Purpose The purpose of this study was to better understand the experiences of people suffering from chronic pain in order to plan client-centred educational interventions.
Methods People in the community with chronic pain were invited via newspapers, newsletters and e-mail discussion lists to participate in a needs assessment process and to attend an educational session at a local community college. Using the nominal group technique, which is a qualitative method of data gathering, 53 participants reported their perceived challenges and needs in dealing with chronic pain. Participants were randomly assigned to one of 10 groups ranging from three to seven people. Responses were pooled to develop an overall list of their major concerns and needs.
Results Issues were classified into six priority areas: medical and treatments, problems with daily living, emotional distress, social issues, sleep disturbances and financial issues. Participants indicated they had difficulty finding accessible, effective and acceptable care. Many participants perceived their family physician or other health-care providers were not adequately meeting their health-care needs. Specifically, sleep disorders; feeling of depression, irritability, worry and anxiety were perceived as medical and treatment areas requiring improvement. In addition, participants sought greater validation of their lived experience of chronic pain.
Conclusion Participants perceived that their needs were not being met adequately. There is a need for further study on physician–patient communication and its impact on patient health status and disability.