SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Adams, W.T. & Birkes, D.S. 1991. Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. In: Biochemical Markers in the Population Genetics of Forest Trees (S. Fineschi, M. E. Malvolti, F. Cannata & H. H. Hattemer, eds), pp. 157–172. SBP Academic, The Hague.
  • 2
    Adams, W.T., Griffin, A.R., Moran, G.F. 1992. Using paternity analysis to measure effective pollen dispersal in plant populations. Am. Natur. 140: 762 780.
  • 3
    Arnold, S. 1994. Bateman’s principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. Am. Natur. 144: S126 S149.
  • 4
    Arnold, S.J. & Wade, M.J. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38: 720 734.
  • 5
    Bateman, A.J. 1948. Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349 368.
  • 6
    Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 224: 223 265.
  • 7
    Bertin, R.I. 1987. Paternity in plants. In: Plant Reproductive Biology: Patterns and Strategies (J. Lovett Doust & L. Lovett Doust, eds), chapter 2. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • 8
    Broyles, S.B. & Wyatt, R. 1990. Paternity analysis in a natural population of Asclepias exaltata: multiple paternity, functional gender, and the ‘pollen donation’ hypothesis. Evolution 44: 1454 1468.
  • 9
    Chakraborty, R., Meagher, T.R., Smouse, P.E. 1988. Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. Genetics 118: 527 536.
  • 10
    Charlesworth, D., Schemske, D.W., Sork, V. 1987. The evolution of plant reproductive characters; sexual versus natural selection. In: The Evolution of Sex and its Consequences (S. C. Stearns, ed.), pp. 317–335. Berkhauser-Verlag, Basel.
  • 11
    Devlin, B., Clegg, J., Ellstrand, N.C. 1992. The effects of flower production on male reproductive success in wild radish populations. Evolution 46: 1030 1042.
  • 12
    Devlin, B. & Ellstrand, N.C. 1990. Male and female fertility variation in wild radish, a hermaphrodite. Am. Natur. 136: 87 107.
  • 13
    Devlin, B., Roeder, K., Ellstrand, N.C. 1988. Fractional paternity assignment: theoretical development and comparison to other methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76: 369 380.
  • 14
    Ellstrand, N.C. & Marshall, D.L. 1985. Interpopulation gene flow by pollen in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. Am. Natur. 126: 606 616.
  • 15
    Godt, M.J.W. & Hamrick, J.L. 1993. Patterns and levels of pollen-mediated gene flow in Lathryus latifolius. Evolution 47: 98 110.
  • 16
    Handel, S.N. 1983. Pollination ecology, plant population structure, and gene flow. In: Pollination Biology (L. Real, ed.), pp. 163–211. Academic Press, New York.
  • 17
    Kaufman, S.R., Smouse, P.E., Alvarez-Buylla, E.R. 1998. Pollen-mediated gene flow and differential male reproductive success in a tropical pioneer tree, Cecropia obtusifolia Bertol. (Moraceae): a paternity analysis. Heredity 81: 164 173.
  • 18
    Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210 1226.
  • 19
    Lloyd, D.G. 1979. Parental strategies of angiosperms. NZ J. Bot. 17: 595 606.
  • 20
    Lyons, E.E., Waser, N.M., Price, M.V., Antonovics, J., Motten, A.F. 1989. Sources of variation in plant reproductive success: a review of the theory. Am. Natur. 134: 409 433.
  • 21
    Meagher, T.R. 1981. The population biology of Chamaelirium luteum, a dioecious lily. II. Mechanisms governing sex ratios . Evolution 35: 557 567.
  • 22
    Meagher, T.R. 1982. The population biology of Chamaelirium luteum, a dioecious member of the lily family. IV. Two-sex population projections and stable population structure . Ecology 63: 1701 1711.
  • 23
    Meagher, T.R. 1986. Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. I. Identification of most-likely parents . Am. Natur. 128: 199 215.
  • 24
    Meagher, T.R. 1991. Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. II. Male reproductive success. Am. Natur. 137: 738 752.
  • 25
    Meagher, T.R. & Antonovics, J. 1982. The population biology of Chamaelirium luteum, a dioecious member of the lily family. III. Life history studies . Ecology 63: 1690 1700.
  • 26
    Meagher, T.R. & Thompson, E.A. 1986. The relationship between single parent and parent pair genetic likelihoods in genealogy reconstruction. Theoret. Population Biol. 29: 87 106.
  • 27
    Meagher, T.R. & Thompson, E.A. 1987. Analysis of parentage for naturally established seedlings of Chamaelirium luteum. Ecology 68: 803 812.
  • 28
    Milligan, B.G. & McMurry, C.K. 1993. Maximum likelihood analysis of male fertility using dominant and codominant genetic markers. Mol. Ecol. 2: 275 283.
  • 29
    Mitchell-Olds, T. & Shaw, R.G. 1987. Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41: 1149 1161.
  • 30
    Primack, R.B. & Kang, H. 1989. Measuring fitness and natural selection in wild plant populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 20: 367 396.
  • 31
    Roeder, K., Devlin, B., Lindsay, B.G. 1989. Applications of maximum likelihood methods to population genetic data for the estimation of individual fertilities. Biometrics 45: 363 379.
  • 32
    Schoen, D.J. & Stewart, S.C. 1986. Variation in male reproductive investment and male reproductive success in white spruce. Evolution 40: 1109 1120.
  • 33
    Schoen, D.J. & Stewart, S.C. 1987. Variation in male fertilities and pairwise mating probabilities in Picea glauca. Genetics 116: 141 152.
  • 34
    Smouse, P.E. 1974. Likelihood analysis of geographic variation in allelic frequencies. II. The logit model and an extension to multiple loci. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 45: 52 58.
  • 35
    Smouse, P.E. & Meagher, T.R. 1994. Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae). Genetics 136: 313 322.
  • 36
    Snow, A.A. & Lewis, P.O. 1993. Reproductive traits and male fertility in plants: empirical approaches. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 331 351.
  • 37
    Stanton, M.L., Snow, A.A., Handel, S.N., Bereczley, J. 1989. The impact of flower-color polymorphism on mating patterns in experimental populations of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.). Evolution 43: 335 346.
  • 38
    Stanton, M., Young, H.J., Ellstrand, N.C., Clegg, J.M. 1991. Consequences of floral variation for male and female reproduction in experimental populations of wild radish, Raphanus sativus L. Evolution 45: 268 280.
  • 39
    Stephenson, A.G. & Bertin, R.I. 1983. Male competition, female choice, and sexual selection in plants. In: Pollination Biology (L. Real, ed.), chapter 6. Academic Press, New York.
  • 40
    Thompson, E.A. 1986. Pedigree Analysis in Human Genetics. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  • 41
    Thompson, E.A. & Meagher, T.R. 1987. Parental and sib likelihoods and genealogy reconstruction. Biometrics 43: 585 600.
  • 42
    Trivers, R. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971 (B. Campbell, ed.), pp. 136–179. Heinemann Educational Books Ltd, London.
  • 43
    Willson, M.F. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. Am. Natur. 113: 777 790.