SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Alberts, S.C. & Ober, C. 1993. Genetic variability of the MHC: a review of nonpathogen-mediated selective mechanisms. Yb. Phys. Antropol. 36: 71 89.
  • 2
    Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • 3
    Andersson, M. & Lwasa, Y. 1996. Sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 53 58.
  • 4
    Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P. 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • 5
    Chao, L. & Levin, B.R. 1981. Structured habitats and the evolution of anticompetitor toxins in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 6324 6328.
  • 6
    Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1981. Allocation of resources to male and female functions in hermaphrodites. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 15: 57 74.
  • 7
    Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • 8
    Greeff, J.M. & Michiels, N.K. 1999. Sperm digestion and reciprocal sperm transfer can drive hermaphrodite sex allocation to equality. Am. Nat. 153: 421 430.
  • 9
    Haig, D. 1993. Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy. Quart. Rev. Biol. 68: 495 532.
  • 10
    Hamilton, W.D. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios; a sex-ratio theory for sex linkage and inbreeding has new implications in cytogenetics and entomology. Science 156: 477 488.
  • 11
    Hamilton, W.D., Axelrod, R., Tanese, R. 1990. Sexual reproduction as an adaption to resist parasites (A review). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 87: 3566 3573.
  • 12
    Harada, Y. & Iwasa, Y. 1996. Female mate preferences to maximize paternal care: a two-step game. Am. Nat. 147: 996 1027.
  • 13
    Jordan, W.C. & Bruford, M.W. 1998. New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity 81: 239 245.
  • 14
    Lively, C.M. & Johnson, S.G. 1994. Brooding and the evolution of parthenogenesis: strategy models and evidence from aquatic invertebrates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 256: 89 95.
  • 15
    Loyning, M.K. & Kirkendall, L.R. 1996. Mate discrimination in a pseudogamous bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): male Ips acuminatus prefer sexual to clonal females. Oikos 77: 336 344.
  • 16
    Maynard Smith, J. 1978. The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • 17
    Møller, A.P. & Swaddle, J.P. 1997. Asymmetry, Developmental Stability and Evolution. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • 18
    Møller, A.P. & Thornhill, R. 1998. Male parental care, differential partential investment and sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 55: 1507 1515.
  • 19
    Petersen, C.W. & Fischer, E.A. 1996. Intraspecific variation in sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite – the effect of individual size. Evolution 50: 636 645.
  • 20
    Rulicke, T., Chapuisat, M., Homberger, F.R., Macas, E., Wedekind, C. 1998. MHC-genotype of progeny influenced by parental infection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 711 716.
  • 21
    Trivers, R.L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971 (B. Campbell, ed.), pp. 136–179. Heinemann, London.
  • 22
    Walter, C.A., Intano, G.W., Mccarrey, J.R., Mcmahan, C.A., Walter, R.B. 1998. Mutation frequency declines during spermatogenesis in young mice but increases in old mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95: 10015 10019.
  • 23
    Wedekind, C., Chapuisat, M., Macas, E., Rulicke, T. 1996. Non-random fertilization in mice correlates with the MHC and something else. Heredity 77: 400 409.
  • 24
    Weinzierl, R.P., Berthold, K., Beukeboom, L.W., Michiels, N.K. 1998. Reduced male allocation in a parthenogenetic hermaphrodite (Dugesia polychroa, Tricladida, Platyhelminthes). Evolution 52: 109 115.
  • 25
    West, S.A., Lively, C.M., Read, A.F. 1999. A pluralist approach to sex and recombination. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 1003 1012.
  • 26
    Wrensch, D.L. & Ebbert, M.A. 1993. Evolution and Diversity of Sex Ratio: Insects and Mites. Chapman and Hall, New York.