SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Bibliography

  • 1
    Ahnesjö, I. 1992. Consequences of male brood care; weight and number of newborn in a sex-role reversed pipefish. Funct. Ecol. 6: 274 281.
  • 2
    Andersson, M.B. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • 3
    Arnold, S.J. & Duvall, D. 1994. Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143: 317 348.
  • 4
    Avise, J.C. 1994. Three fundamental contributions of molecular genetics to avian ecology and evolution. Ibis 138: 16 25.
  • 5
    Bateman, A.J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349 368.
  • 6
    Berglund, A., Rosenqvist, G., Svensson, I. 1986. Mate choice, fecundity and sexual dimorphism in two pipefish species (Syngnathidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 301 307.
  • 7
    Berglund, A., Rosenqvist, G., Svensson, I. 1988. Multiple matings and paternal brood care in the pipefish, Syngnathus typhle. Oikos 51: 184 188.
  • 8
    Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P. 1992. Sperm Competition in Birds: Evolutionary Causes and Consequences. Academic Press, London.
  • 9
    Brotherton, P.N.M., Pemberton, J.M., Komers, P.E., Malarky, G. 1997. Genetic and behavioural evidence of monogamy in a mammal, Kirk’s dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii) . Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 675 681.
  • 10
    Coltman, D.W., Bancroft, D.R., Robertson, A., Smith, J.A., Clutton-Brock, T.H., Pemberton, J.M. 1999. Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity. Mol. Ecol. 8: 1199 1209.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00683.x
  • 11
    Cunningham, E.J.A. & Birkhead, T.R. 1998. Sex roles and sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 56: 1311 1321.DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0953
  • 12
    Dawson, C.E. 1985. Indo-Pacific Pipefishes, Red Sea to the Americas. The Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, Mississippi.
  • 13
    Decker, M.D., Parker, P.G., Minchella, D.J., Rabenold, K.N. 1993. Monogamy in black vultures: genetic evidence from DNA fingerprinting. Behav. Ecol. 4: 29 35.
  • 14
    Gronell, A.M. 1984. Courtship spawning and social organization of the pipefish, Corythoichthys intestinalis (Pisces: Syngnathidae) with notes on two congeneric species. Z. Tierpsychol. 65: 1 24.
  • 15
    Johnstone, R.A. 1997. The tactics of mutual mate choice and competitive search. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40: 51 59.DOI: 10.1007/s002650050315
  • 16
    Jones, A.G. & Avise, J.C. 1997a. Microsatellite analysis of maternity and the mating system in the Gulf pipefish Syngnathus scovelli, a species with male pregnancy and sex-role reversal . Mol. Ecol. 6: 203 213.
  • 17
    Jones, A.G. & Avise, J.C. 1997b. Polygynandry in the dusky pipefish Syngnathus floridae revealed by microsatellite DNA markers. Evolution 51: 1611 1622.
  • 18
    Jones, A.G., Kvarnemo, C., Moore, G.I., Simmons, L.W., Avise, J.C. 1998. Microsatellite evidence for monogamy and sex-biased recombination in the Western Australian seahorse Hippocampus angustus. Mol. Ecol. 7: 1497 1506.
  • 19
    Jones, A.G., Rosenqvist, G., Berglund, A., Avise, J.C. 1999. The genetic mating system of a sex-role-reversed pipefish (Syngnathus typhle): a molecular inquiry . Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46: 357 365.DOI: 10.1007/s002650050630
  • 20
    Ketterson, E.D., Parker, P.G., Raouf, S.A., Nolan, V., Ziegenfus, C., Chandler, C.R. 1998. The relative impact of extra-pair fertilisations on variation in male and female reproductive success in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) . Ornithol. Monogr. 49: 81 102.
  • 21
    Kirkpatrick, M., Price, T., Arnold, S.J. 1990. The Darwin-Fisher theory of sexual selection in monogamous birds. Evolution 44: 180 193.
  • 22
    Lourie, S.A., Vincent, A.C.J., Hall, H.J. 1999. Seahorses: an identification guide to the world’s species and their conservation. Project Seahorse, London.
  • 23
    Masonjones, H.D. 1997. Sexual Selection in the Dwarf Seahorse, Hippocampus zosterae (Syngnathidae): an investigation into the mechanisms determining the degree of male vs. female intrasexual competition and intersexual choice. PhD Thesis, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
  • 24
    Masonjones, H.D. & Lewis, S.M. 1996. Courtship behavior in the dwarf seahorse, Hippocampus zosterae. Copeia 1996: 634 640.
  • 25
    Masonjones, H.D. & Lewis, S.M. 2000. Differences in potential reproductive rates of male and female seahorses related to courtship roles. Anim. Behav. 59: 11 20.DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1269
  • 26
    Mauck, R.A., Waite, T.A., Parker, P.G. 1995. Monogamy on Leach’s storm-petrel: DNA-fingerprinting evidence. Auk 112: 473 482.
  • 27
    Piper, W.H., Evers, D.C., Meyer, M.W., Tischler, K.B., Kaplan, J.D., Fleischer, R.C. 1997. Genetic monogamy in the common loon. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 25 31.DOI: 10.1007/s002650050360
  • 28
    Ranta, E. & Kaitala, V. 1999. Punishment of polygyny. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 2337 2341.DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0928
  • 29
    Ribble, D.O. 1991. The monogamous mating system of Peromyscus californicus as revealed by DNA fingerprinting. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 161 166.
  • 30
    Vincent, A.C.J. 1990. Reproductive Ecology of Seahorses. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  • 31
    Vincent, A.C.J. 1994a. Seahorses exhibit conventional sex roles in mating competition, despite male pregnancy. Behaviour 128: 135 151.
  • 32
    Vincent, A.C.J. 1994b. Operational sex ratios in seahorses. Behaviour 128: 153 167.
  • 33
    Vincent, A.C.J. 1995. A role for daily greetings in maintaining seahorse pair bonds. Anim. Behav. 49: 258 260.
  • 34
    Vincent, A., Ahnesjö, I., Berglund, A., Rosenqvist, G. 1992. Pipefishes and seahorses: are they all sex role reversed? Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 237 241.
  • 35
    Vincent, A.J.C. & Sadler, L.M. 1995. Faithful pair bonds in wild seahorses, Hippocampus whitei. Anim. Behav. 50: 1557 1569.
  • 36
    Watanabe, S., Watanabe, Y., Okiyama, M. 1997. Monogamous mating and conventional sex roles in Hippichthys penicillus (Syngnathidae) under laboratory conditions. Ichthyol. Res. 44: 306 310.