SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Osamu Kishida, Ayumi Tezuka, Akiko Ikeda, Kunio Takatsu, Hirofumi Michimae, Adaptive acceleration in growth and development of salamander hatchlings in cannibalistic situations, Functional Ecology, 2015, 29, 4
  2. 2
    Yusuke Ikegawa, Hideo Ezoe, Toshiyuki Namba, Effects of generalized and specialized adaptive defense by shared prey on intra-guild predation, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2015, 364, 231

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Melissa B. Youngquist, Michael I. Sitvarin, Predicting Predatory Outcomes in the Context of Carryover Effects: Interactions between Juvenile Frogs and Spider Predators, Ethology, 2015, 121, 6
  4. 4
    Thomas Carle, Candy Rowe, Avian predators change their foraging strategy on defended prey when undefended prey are hard to find, Animal Behaviour, 2014, 93, 97

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Rosa Arribas, Carmen Díaz-Paniagua, Ivan Gomez-Mestre, Ecological consequences of amphibian larvae and their native and alien predators on the community structure of temporary ponds, Freshwater Biology, 2014, 59, 9
  6. 6
    W. Cresswell, J. L. Quinn, Contrasting risks from different predators change the overall nonlethal effects of predation risk, Behavioral Ecology, 2013, 24, 4, 871

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Rayan El Balaa, Gabriel Blouin-Demers, Does exposure to cues of fish predators fed different diets affect morphology and performance of Northern Leopard Frog (Lithobates pipiens) larvae?, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2013, 91, 4, 203

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Eudald Pujol-Buxó, Olatz San Sebastián, Núria Garriga, Gustavo A. Llorente, How does the invasive/native nature of species influence tadpoles’ plastic responses to predators?, Oikos, 2013, 122, 1
  9. 9
    Brooke C. Reeve, Erica J. Crespi, Christopher M. Whipps, Jesse L. Brunner, Natural Stressors and Ranavirus Susceptibility in Larval Wood Frogs (Rana sylvatica), EcoHealth, 2013, 10, 2, 190

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Stéphane Caut, Elena Angulo, Carmen Díaz-Paniagua, Ivan Gomez-Mestre, Plastic changes in tadpole trophic ecology revealed by stable isotope analysis, Oecologia, 2013, 173, 1, 95

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    C. P. B. Breviglieri, G. C. O. Piccoli, W. Uieda, G. Q. Romero, Predation-risk effects of predator identity on the foraging behaviors of frugivorous bats, Oecologia, 2013, 173, 3, 905

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    David M. Costello, Matt J. Michel, Predator-induced defenses in tadpoles confound body stoichiometry predictions of the general stress paradigm, Ecology, 2013, 94, 10, 2229

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    John R. Ford, Stephen E. Swearer, Shoaling behaviour enhances risk of predation from multiple predator guilds in a marine fish, Oecologia, 2013, 172, 2, 387

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Christopher M. Asquith, James R. Vonesh, Effects of size and size structure on predation and inter-cohort competition in red-eyed treefrog tadpoles, Oecologia, 2012, 170, 3, 629

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    N.A. Haislip, J.T. Hoverman, D.L. Miller, M.J. Gray, Natural stressors and disease risk: does the threat of predation increase amphibian susceptibility to ranavirus?, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2012, 90, 7, 893

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Paul E. Bourdeau, Frank Johansson, Predator-induced morphological defences as by-products of prey behaviour: a review and prospectus, Oikos, 2012, 121, 8
  17. 17
    Nino Maag, Lukas Gehrer, Douglas C. Woodhams, Sink or swim: a test of tadpole behavioral responses to predator cues and potential alarm pheromones from skin secretions, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2012, 198, 11, 841

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Valeria Gómez, Arturo Kehr, The effect of chemical signal of predatory fish and water bug on the morphology and development of Elachistocleis bicolor tadpoles (Anura: Microhylidae), Biologia, 2012, 67, 5

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    M. R. WALSH, D. M. POST, The impact of intraspecific variation in a fish predator on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity and investment in sex in Daphnia ambigua, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2012, 25, 1
  20. 20
    ATTILA HETTYEY, FRANZISKA RÖLLI, NINA THÜRLIMANN, ANNE-CATHERINE ZÜRCHER, JOSH VAN BUSKIRK, Visual cues contribute to predator detection in anuran larvae, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 106, 4
  21. 21
    MATT J. MICHEL, STEPHANIE BURKE, Consequences of an amphibian malformity for development and fitness in complex environments, Freshwater Biology, 2011, 56, 7
  22. 22
    A. HETTYEY, K. VINCZE, S. ZSARNÓCZAI, H. HOI, A. LAURILA, Costs and benefits of defences induced by predators differing in dangerousness, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2011, 24, 5
  23. 23
    Jesper Givskov Sørensen, Volker Loeschcke, Juha Merilä, Anssi Laurila, Effects of predator exposure on Hsp70 expression and survival in tadpoles of the Common Frog (Rana temporaria), Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2011, 89, 12, 1249

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    L. Fredrik Sundström, Robert H. Devlin, Increased intrinsic growth rate is advantageous even under ecologically stressful conditions in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), Evolutionary Ecology, 2011, 25, 2, 447

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    I. Gomez-Mestre, C. Diaz-Paniagua, Invasive predatory crayfish do not trigger inducible defences in tadpoles, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2011, 278, 1723, 3364

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Justin Charles Touchon, Karen Michelle Warkentin, Thermally contingent plasticity: temperature alters expression of predator-induced colour and morphology in a Neotropical treefrog tadpole, Journal of Animal Ecology, 2011, 80, 1
  27. 27
    Paul E. Bourdeau, Cue reliability, risk sensitivity and inducible morphological defense in a marine snail, Oecologia, 2010, 162, 4, 987

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Mathieu Denoël, Marion Bichot, Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Johann Delcourt, Marc Ylieff, Patrick Kestemont, Pascal Poncin, Cumulative effects of road de-icing salt on amphibian behavior, Aquatic Toxicology, 2010, 99, 2, 275

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    TORBEN WITTWER, GÖRAN SAHLÉN, FRANK SUHLING, Does one community shape the other? Dragonflies and fish in Swedish lakes, Insect Conservation and Diversity, 2010, 3, 2
  30. 30
    Geoffrey R. Smith, Allison Boyd, Christopher B. Dayer, Megan E. Ogle, Andrew J. Terlecky, Christopher J. Dibble, Effects of Sibship and the Presence of Multiple Predators on the Behavior of Green Frog (Rana clamitans) Tadpoles, Ethology, 2010, 116, 3
  31. 31
    Chiara Morosinotto, Robert L. Thomson, Erkki Korpimäki, Habitat selection as an antipredator behaviour in a multi-predator landscape: all enemies are not equal, Journal of Animal Ecology, 2010, 79, 2
  32. 32
    Attila Hettyey, Szilvia Zsarnóczai, Krisztina Vincze, Herbert Hoi, Anssi Laurila, Interactions between the information content of different chemical cues affect induced defences in tadpoles, Oikos, 2010, 119, 11
  33. 33
    Mark Broom, Andrew D. Higginson, Graeme D. Ruxton, Optimal investment across different aspects of anti-predator defences, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2010, 263, 4, 579

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    A. GONDA, N. TROKOVIC, G. HERCZEG, A. LAURILA, J. MERILÄ, Predation- and competition-mediated brain plasticity in Rana temporaria tadpoles, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2010, 23, 11
  35. 35
    Fabián Gastón Jara, María Gabriela Perotti, Risk of predation and behavioural response in three anuran species: influence of tadpole size and predator type, Hydrobiologia, 2010, 644, 1, 313

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Jonathan K. Webb, Wei Guo Du, David A. Pike, Richard Shine, Chemical cues from both dangerous and nondangerous snakes elicit antipredator behaviours from a nocturnal lizard, Animal Behaviour, 2009, 77, 6, 1471

    CrossRef

  37. 37
    Nancy M. Schoeppner, Rick A. Relyea, Interpreting the smells of predation: how alarm cues and kairomones induce different prey defences, Functional Ecology, 2009, 23, 6
  38. 38
    Tibor Hartel, Szilárd Nemes, Dan Cogălniceanu, Kinga Öllerer, Cosmin Ioan Moga, David Lesbarrères, László Demeter, Pond and landscape determinants of Rana dalmatina population sizes in a Romanian rural landscape, Acta Oecologica, 2009, 35, 1, 53

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Aaren S. Freeman, John Meszaros, James E. Byers, Poor phenotypic integration of blue mussel inducible defenses in environments with multiple predators, Oikos, 2009, 118, 5
  40. 40
    Anssi Laurila, Beatrice Lindgren, Ane T. Laugen, ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSES ALONG A LATITUDINAL GRADIENT INRANA TEMPORARIA, Ecology, 2008, 89, 5, 1399

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Hilary S. Callahan, Heather Maughan, Ulrich K. Steiner, Phenotypic Plasticity, Costs of Phenotypes, and Costs of Plasticity, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008, 1133, 1
  42. 42
    Mark C. Urban, Salamander evolution across a latitudinal cline in gape-limited predation risk, Oikos, 2008, 117, 7
  43. 43
    Fabián Gastón Jara, Tadpole–odonate larvae interactions: influence of body size and diel rhythm, Aquatic Ecology, 2008, 42, 3, 503

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    Mark C. Urban, The evolution of prey body size reaction norms in diverse communities, Journal of Animal Ecology, 2008, 77, 2
  45. 45
    Gil Stav, Burt P. Kotler, Leon Blaustein, Direct and indirect effects of dragonfly (Anax imperator) nymphs on green toad (Bufo viridis) tadpoles, Hydrobiologia, 2007, 579, 1, 85

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Céline Teplitsky, Anssi Laurila, FLEXIBLE DEFENSE STRATEGIES: COMPETITION MODIFIES INVESTMENT IN BEHAVIORAL VS. MORPHOLOGICAL DEFENSES, Ecology, 2007, 88, 7, 1641

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Ulrich K. Steiner, Linking antipredator behaviour, ingestion, gut evacuation and costs of predator-induced responses in tadpoles, Animal Behaviour, 2007, 74, 5, 1473

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    DEVI STUART-FOX, MARTIN J. WHITING, ADNAN MOUSSALLI, Camouflage and colour change: antipredator responses to bird and snake predators across multiple populations in a dwarf chameleon, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 88, 3
  49. 49
    OSAMU KISHIDA, KINYA NISHIMURA, Flexible architecture of inducible morphological plasticity, Journal of Animal Ecology, 2006, 75, 3
  50. 50
    Ibrahim Çakmak, Arne Janssen, Maurice W. Sabelis, Intraguild Interactions Between the Predatory Mites Neoseiulus californicus and Phytoseiulus persimilis, Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2006, 38, 1, 33

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    Anssi Laurila, Susanna Pakkasmaa, Juha Merilä, Population divergence in growth rate and antipredator defences in Rana arvalis, Oecologia, 2006, 147, 4, 585

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Michael F. Benard, SURVIVAL TRADE-OFFS BETWEEN TWO PREDATOR-INDUCED PHENOTYPES IN PACIFIC TREEFROGS (PSEUDACRIS REGILLA), Ecology, 2006, 87, 2, 340

    CrossRef

  53. 53
    Gage H. Dayton, Daniel Saenz, Kristen A. Baum, R. Brian Langerhans, Thomas J. DeWitt, Body shape, burst speed and escape behavior of larval anurans, Oikos, 2005, 111, 3
  54. 54
    Céline Teplitsky, Sandrine Plénet, Pierre Joly, Costs and limits of dosage response to predation risk: to what extent can tadpoles invest in anti-predator morphology?, Oecologia, 2005, 145, 3, 364

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    C. Teplitsky, S. Plenet, J. -P. Léna, N. Mermet, E. Malet, P. Joly, Escape behaviour and ultimate causes of specific induced defences in an anuran tadpole, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2005, 18, 1
  56. 56
    R. S. WILSON, P. G. KRAFT, R. VAN DAMME, Predator-specific changes in the morphology and swimming performance of larval Rana lessonae, Functional Ecology, 2005, 19, 2
  57. 57
    D. T Blumstein, J. C Daniel, The loss of anti-predator behaviour following isolation on islands, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2005, 272, 1573, 1663

    CrossRef

  58. 58
    Melinda G. Knutson, William B. Richardson, David M. Reineke, Brian R. Gray, Jeffrey R. Parmelee, Shawn E. Weick, AGRICULTURAL PONDS SUPPORT AMPHIBIAN POPULATIONS, Ecological Applications, 2004, 14, 3, 669

    CrossRef

  59. 59
    Osamu Kishida, Kinya Nishimura, Bulgy tadpoles: inducible defense morph, Oecologia, 2004, 140, 3, 414

    CrossRef

  60. 60
    Céline Teplitsky, Sandrine Plenet, Pierre Joly, HIERARCHICAL RESPONSES OF TADPOLES TO MULTIPLE PREDATORS, Ecology, 2004, 85, 10, 2888

    CrossRef

  61. 61
    Andrew Storfer, Candace White, Phenotypically Plastic Responses of Larval Tiger Salamanders, Ambystoma tigrinum, to Different Predators, Journal of Herpetology, 2004, 38, 4, 612

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    Tracy Langkilde, Richard Shine, Robert T. Mason, Predatory Attacks to the Head vs. Body Modify Behavioral Responses of Garter Snakes, Ethology, 2004, 110, 12
  63. 63
    Anssi Laurila, Maria Järvi-Laturi, Susanna Pakkasmaa, Juha Merilä, Temporal variation in predation risk: stage-dependency, graded responses and fitness costs in tadpole antipredator defences, Oikos, 2004, 107, 1
  64. 64
    Karine Poitrineau, Sam P. Brown, Michael E. Hochberg, The joint evolution of defence and inducibility against natural enemies, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2004, 231, 3, 389

    CrossRef

  65. 65
    Daniel Saenz, James B. Johnson, Cory K. Adams, Gage H. Dayton, M. E. Douglas, Accelerated Hatching of Southern Leopard Frog (Rana sphenocephala) Eggs in Response to the Presence of a Crayfish (Procambarus nigrocinctus) Predator, Copeia, 2003, 2003, 3, 646

    CrossRef

  66. 66
    Jana L.D Davis, William J Metcalfe, Anson H Hines, Implications of a fluctuating fish predator guild on behavior, distribution, and abundance of a shared prey species: the grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2003, 293, 1, 23

    CrossRef

  67. 67
    James B Johnson, Daniel Saenz, Cory K Adams, Richard N Conner, The influence of predator threat on the timing of a life-history switch point: predator-induced hatching in the southern leopard frog (Rana sphenocephala), Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2003, 81, 9, 1608

    CrossRef

  68. 68
    Josh Van Buskirk, A Comparative Test of the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis: Relationships between Habitat and Phenotype in Anuran Larvae, The American Naturalist, 2002, 160, 1, 87

    CrossRef

  69. 69
    Iris C. Vorndran, Elke Reichwaldt, Beate Nürnberger, DOES DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TO PREDATION IN TADPOLES STABILIZE THE BOMBINA HYBRID ZONE?, Ecology, 2002, 83, 6, 1648

    CrossRef

  70. 70
    Josh Van Buskirk, PHENOTYPIC LABILITY AND THE EVOLUTION OF PREDATOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY IN TADPOLES, Evolution, 2002, 56, 2, 361

    CrossRef

  71. 71
    Josh Buskirk, PHENOTYPIC LABILITY AND THE EVOLUTION OF PREDATOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY IN TADPOLES, Evolution, 2002, 56, 2