SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Andersson, S. 1994. Floral stability, pollination efficiency, and experimental manipulation of the corolla phenotype in Nemophila menziesii (Hydrophyllaceae). Am. J. Bot. 81: 13971402.
  • 2
    Armbruster, W.S. 1991. Multilevel analysis of morphometric data from natural plant populations: insights into ontogenetic, genetic, and selective correlations in Dalechampia scandens. Evolution 45: 12291244.
  • 3
    Armbruster, W.S., Di Stilio, V.S., Tuxill, J.D., Flores, T.C., Velásquez Runk, J.L. 1999. Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine Neotropical plants: a re-evaluation of Berg’s correlation-pleiades concept. Am. J. Bot. 86: 3955.
  • 4
    Armbruster, W.S. & Schwaegerle, K.E. 1996. Causes of covariation of phenotypic traits among populations. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 261276.
  • 5
    Ashman, T.L. 1998. Is relative pollen production or removal a good predictor of relative male fitness? An experimental exploration with a wild strawberry (Fragaria virginiana, Rosaceae). Am. J. Bot. 85: 11661171.
  • 6
    Ashman, T.L., Swetz, J., Shivitz, S. 2000. Understanding the basis of pollinator selectivity in sexually dimorphic Fragaria virginiana. Oikos 90: 347356.
  • 7
    Bell, G. 1985. On the function of flowers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Series B 224: 223265.
  • 8
    Berg, R.L. 1959. A general evolutionary principle underlying the origin of developmental homeostasis. Am. Nat. 93: 103105.
  • 9
    Berg, R.L. 1960. The ecological significance of correlation pleiades. Evolution 14: 171180.
  • 10
    Brodie, E.D., Moore, A.J., Janzen, F.J. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 313318.
  • 11
    Campbell, D.R., Waser, N.M., Price, M.V., Lynch, E.A., Mitchell, R.J. 1991. Components of phenotypic selection: pollen export and flower corolla width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 45: 14581467.
  • 12
    Caruso, C.M. 2000. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution 54: 15461557.
  • 13
    Clements, F.E. & Long, F.L. 1923. Experimental pollination. An Outline of the Ecology of Flowers and Insects. Publications no. 336. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC, USA
  • 14
    Coen, E.S. & Nugent, J.M. 1994. Evolution of flowers and inflorescences. Development 1994 (Suppl.): 107116.
  • 15
    Conner, J.K., Davis, R., Rush, S. 1995. The effect of wild radish floral morphology on pollination efficiency by four taxa of pollinators. Oecologia 104: 234245.
  • 16
    Conner, J.K. & Rush, S. 1996. Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105: 509516.
  • 17
    Conner, J.K. & Rush, S. 1997. Measurements of selection on floral traits in black mustard, Brassica nigra. J. Evol. Biol. 10: 327335.DOI: 10.1007/s000360050026
  • 18
    Conner, J.K., Rush, S., Jennetten, P. 1996. Measurements of natural selection on floral traits in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). I. Selection through lifetime female fitness. Evolution 50: 11271136.
  • 19
    Conner, J.K. & Sterling, A. 1995. Testing hypotheses of functional relationships: a comparative survey of correlation patterns among floral traits in five insect-pollinated plants. Am. J. Bot. 82: 13991406.
  • 20
    Conner, J.K. & Sterling, A. 1996. Selection for independence of floral and vegetative traits: evidence from correlation patterns in five species. Can. J. Bot. 74: 642644.
  • 21
    Conner, J. & Via, S. 1993. Patterns of phenotypic and genetic correlations among morphological and life-history traits in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Evolution 47: 704711.
  • 22
    Cubas, P., Vincent, C., Coen, E. 1999. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401: 157161.DOI: 10.1038/43657
  • 23
    Endler, J.A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • 24
    Endler, J.A. 1995. Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 2229.DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)88956-9
  • 25
    Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd edn. Longman, Harlow, UK.
  • 26
    Gómez, J.M. 2000. Phenotypic selection and response to selection in Lobularia maritima: importance of direct and correlational components of natural selection. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 689699.DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00196.x
  • 27
    Grant, V. 1975. The Genetics of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
  • 28
    Herrera, C.M. 1987. Components of pollinator ‘quality’: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50: 7990.
  • 29
    Herrera, C.M. 1988. Variation in mutualisms: the spatio-temporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 35: 95125.
  • 30
    Herrera, C.M. 1989. Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the ‘quantity’ component in a plant-pollinator system. Oecologia 80: 241248.
  • 31
    Herrera, C.M. 1990. Brood size reduction in Lavandula latifolia: a test of alternative hypotheses. Evol. Trends Plants 4: 99105.
  • 32
    Herrera, C.M. 1991. Dissecting factors responsible for individual variation in plant fecundity. Ecology 72: 14361448.
  • 33
    Herrera, C.M. 1993. Selection on floral morphology and environmental determinants of fecundity in a hawk moth-pollinated violet. Ecol. Monogr. 63: 251275.
  • 34
    Herrera, C.M. 1995. Microclimate and individual variation in pollinators: flowering plants are more than their flowers. Ecology 76: 15161524.
  • 35
    Herrera, C.M. 2000. Flower-to-seedling consequences of different pollination regimes in an insect-pollinated shrub. Ecology 81: 1529.
  • 36
    Herrera, J. 1997. The role of colored accessory bracts in the reproductive biology of Lavandula stoechas. Ecology 78: 494504.
  • 37
    Johnson, S.G., Delph, L.F., Elderkin, C.L. 1995. The effect of petal-size manipulation on pollen removal, seed set, and insect-visitor behavior in Campanula americana. Oecologia 102: 174179.
  • 38
    Lamborn, E. & Ollerton, J. 2000. Experimental assessment of the functional morphology of inflorescences of Daucus carota (Apiaceae): testing the ‘fly catcher effect’. Funct. Ecol. 14: 445454.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00440.x
  • 39
    Lande, R. 1980. The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94: 203215.
  • 40
    Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 12101226.
  • 41
    Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., Wolfinger, R.D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
  • 42
    Luo, D., Carpenter, R., Vincent, C., Copsey, L., Coen, E. 1995. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383: 794799.
  • 43
    Maad, J. 2000. Phenotypic selection in hawkmoth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia: targets and fitness surfaces. Evolution 54: 112123.
  • 44
    Martin, F.W. 1959. Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technol. 34: 125128.
  • 45
    Méndez, M. & Obeso, J.R. 1992. Influencia del osmóforo en la producción de infrutescencias en Arum italicum Miller (Araceae). Anal. Jard. Bot. Madrid 50: 229237.
  • 46
    Mitchell, R.J. & Waser, N.M. 1992. Adaptive significance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar production: pollination success of single flowers. Ecology 73: 633638.
  • 47
    O'Connell, L.M. & Johnston, M.O. 1998. Male and female pollination success in a deceptive orchid, a selection study. Ecology 79: 12461260.
  • 48
    Palmer, A.R. 1999. Detecting publication bias in meta-analyses: a case study of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 154: 220233.DOI: 10.1086/303223
  • 49
    Pedhazur, E.J. 1982. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research, 2nd edn. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
  • 50
    Philip, M. & Hansen, T. 2000. The influence of plant and corolla size on pollen deposition and seed set in Geranium sanguineum (Geraniaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 20: 129140.
  • 51
    Phillips, P.C. & Arnold, S.J. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43: 12091222.
  • 52
    SAS Institute. 1996a. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.11. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
  • 53
    SAS Institute. 1996b. SAS/STAT software: Changes and Enhancements for Release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
  • 54
    Schemske, D.W. & Ågren, J. 1995. Deceit pollination and selection on female flower size in Begonia involucrata: an experimental approach. Evolution 49: 207214.
  • 55
    Schemske, D.W. & Horvitz, C.C. 1989. Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. Evolution 43: 461465.
  • 56
    Schluter, D. & Nychka, D. 1994. Exploring fitness surfaces. Am. Nat. 143: 597616.
  • 57
    Smith, C.E., Stevens, J.T., Temeles, E.J., Ewald, P.W., Hebert, R.J., Bonkovsky, R.L. 1996. Effect of floral orifice width and shape on hummingbird–flower interactions. Oecologia 106: 482492.
  • 58
    Snow, A.A. 1989. Assessing the gender role of hermaphroditic flowers. Funct. Ecol. 3: 249250.
  • 59
    Stanton, M.L. & Preston, R.E. 1988. Ecological consequences and phenotypic correlates of petal size variation in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 75: 528539.
  • 60
    Stebbins, G.L. 1974. Flowering Plants. Evolution Above the Species Level. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • 61
    Suárez-Cervera, M. & Seoane-Camba, J.A. 1986. Sobre la distribución corológica del género Lavandula L. en la Península Ibérica. Lazaroa 9: 201220.
  • 62
    Temeles, E.J. & Rankin, A.G. 2000. Effect of the lower lip of Monarda didyma on pollen removal by hummingbirds. Can. J. Bot. 78: 11641168.DOI: 10.1139/cjb-78-9-1164
  • 63
    Thompson, J.D. 2001. How do visitation patterns vary among pollinators in relation to floral display and floral design in a generalist pollination system? Oecologia 126: 386394.
  • 64
    Waitt, D.E. & Levin, D.A. 1993. Phenotypic integration and plastic correlations in Phlox drummondii (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80: 12241233.
  • 65
    Wilson, P. 1994. The east-facing flowers of Drosera tracyi. Am. Mid. Nat. 131: 366369.
  • 66
    Wilson, P. 1995a. Selection for pollination success and the mechanical fit of Impatiens flowers around bumblebee bodies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 55: 355383.
  • 67
    Wilson, P. 1995b. Variation in the intensity of pollination in Drosera tracyi: selection is strongest when resources are intermediate. Evol. Ecol. 9: 382396.
  • 68
    Wilson, P. & Thomson, J.D. 1991. Heterogeneity among floral visitors leads to discordance between removal and deposition of pollen. Ecology 72: 15031507.
  • 69
    Wilson, P. & Thomson, J.D. 1996. How do flowers diverge? In: Floral Biology. Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants (D. G. Lloyd & S. C. H. Barrett, eds), pp. 88–111. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • 70
    Wilson, P., Thomson, J.D., Stanton, M.L., Rigney, L.P. 1994. Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. Am. Nat. 143: 283296.
  • 71
    Young, H.J. & Stanton, M.L. 1990. Influences of floral variation on pollen removal and seed production in wild radish. Ecology 71: 536547.