SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    EMILIE CROS, BERTHOLD HEDWIG, Auditory pattern recognition and steering in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus, Physiological Entomology, 2014, 39, 1
  2. 2
    L. W. Simmons, M. L. Thomas, B. Gray, M. Zuk, Replicated evolutionary divergence in the cuticular hydrocarbon profile of male crickets associated with the loss of song in the Hawaiian archipelago, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2014, 27, 10
  3. 3
    Isabelle Charrier, Nicolas Mathevon, Thierry Aubin, Bearded seal males perceive geographic variation in their trills, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2013, 67, 10, 1679

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Jacobus C. de Roode, Thierry Lefèvre, Behavioral Immunity in Insects, Insects, 2012, 3, 4, 789

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    R. M. TINGHITELLA, M. ZUK, M. BEVERIDGE, L. W. SIMMONS, Island hopping introduces Polynesian field crickets to novel environments, genetic bottlenecks and rapid evolution, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2011, 24, 6
  6. 6
    Soo-Jin Jang, Hyon-Gyong An, Yi-Kweon Jang, Calling song and phonotactic selectivity in the field cricket Teleogryllus emma (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), Journal of Ecology and Field Biology, 2010, 33, 4, 307

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    James H. Fullard, Hannah M. ter Hofstede, John M. Ratcliffe, Gerald S. Pollack, Gian S. Brigidi, Robin M. Tinghitella, Marlene Zuk, Release from bats: genetic distance and sensoribehavioural regression in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus, Naturwissenschaften, 2010, 97, 1, 53

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Robin M. Tinghitella, Marlene Zuk, ASYMMETRIC MATING PREFERENCES ACCOMMODATED THE RAPID EVOLUTIONARY LOSS OF A SEXUAL SIGNAL, Evolution, 2009, 63, 8
  9. 9
    D. Rebar, N. W. Bailey, M. Zuk, Courtship song's role during female mate choice in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus, Behavioral Ecology, 2009, 20, 6, 1307

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    R. M. Tinghitella, J. M. Wang, M. Zuk, Preexisting behavior renders a mutation adaptive: flexibility in male phonotaxis behavior and the loss of singing ability in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus, Behavioral Ecology, 2009, 20, 4, 722

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    G.A. Pinto-Juma, S.G. Seabra, J.A. Quartau, Patterns of acoustic variation in Cicada barbara Stål (Hemiptera, Cicadoidea) from the Iberian Peninsula and Morocco, Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2008, 98, 01

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    R M Tinghitella, Rapid evolutionary change in a sexual signal: genetic control of the mutation ‘flatwing’ that renders male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) mute, Heredity, 2008, 100, 3, 261

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Raúl A. Laumann, Maria Carolina Blassioli Moraes, Andrej Čokl, Miguel Borges, Eavesdropping on sexual vibratory signals of stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) by the egg parasitoid Telenomus podisi, Animal Behaviour, 2007, 73, 4, 637

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    J. M. Russ, P. A. Racey, Species-specificity and individual variation in the song of male Nathusius’ pipistrelles (Pipistrellus nathusii), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2007, 61, 5, 669

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Daniel R. Howard, Peggy S. M. Hill, Morphology and calling song characteristics in Gryllotalpa major Saussure (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae), Journal of Orthoptera Research, 2006, 15, 1, 53

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    M. Zuk, J. T Rotenberry, R. M Tinghitella, Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets, Biology Letters, 2006, 2, 4, 521

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Leigh W. Simmons, Genotypic variation in calling song and female preferences of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus, Animal Behaviour, 2004, 68, 2, 313

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Marlene Zuk, Leigh W Simmons, John T Rotenberry, Andrew M Stoehr, Sex differences in immunity in two species of field crickets, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2004, 82, 4, 627

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Sean E. Walker, William H. Cade, A simulation model of the effects of frequency dependence, density dependence and parasitoid flies on the fitness of male field crickets, Ecological Modelling, 2003, 169, 1, 119

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Winston J. Bailey, Insect duets: underlying mechanisms and their evolution, Physiological Entomology, 2003, 28, 3
  21. 21
    Sean E Walker, William H Cade, The effects of temperature and age on calling song in a field cricket with a complex calling song,Teleogryllus oceanicus(Orthoptera: Gryllidae), Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2003, 81, 8, 1414

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    JULIA WYCHERLEY, SIMON DORAN, TREVOR J. C. BEEBEE, Male advertisement call characters as phylogeographical indicators in European water frogs, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2002, 77, 3
    Direct Link:
  23. 23
    Susan M. Bertram, TEMPORALLY FLUCTUATING SELECTION OF SEX-LIMITED SIGNALING TRAITS IN THE TEXAS FIELD CRICKET, GRYLLUS TEXENSIS, Evolution, 2002, 56, 9, 1831

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Susan M. Bertram, TEMPORALLY FLUCTUATING SELECTION OF SEX-LIMITED SIGNALING TRAITS IN THE TEXAS FIELD CRICKET, GRYLLUS TEXENSIS, Evolution, 2002, 56, 9