SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • 2
    Bonduriansky, R. 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. 76: 305339.
  • 3
    Cook, P.A. & Gage, M.J.G. 1995. Effects of risks of sperm competition on the numbers of eupyrene and apyrene sperm ejaculated by the moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36: 261268.
  • 4
    Dewsbury, D.A. 1982. Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am. Nat. 119: 601610.
  • 5
    Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • 6
    Engqvist, L. & Sauer, K.P. 2001. Strategic male mating effort and cryptic male choice in a scorpionfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 729735.DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1423
  • 7
    Forrest, S. 1993. Genetic algorithms – principles of natural selection applied to computation. Science 261: 872878.
  • 8
    Fretwell, S.D. & Lucas, H.L. 1970. On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19: 1636.
  • 9
    Fryer, T., Cannings, C. & Vickers, G.T. 1998. Sperm competition I: basic model, ESS and dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 196: 81100.
  • 10
    Gage, M.J.G. 1998. Influences of sex, size, and symmetry on ejaculate expenditure in a moth. Behav. Ecol. 9: 592597.
  • 11
    Gage, A.R. & Barnard, C.J. 1996. Male crickets increase sperm number in relation to competition and female size. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38: 349353.
  • 12
    Galvani, A. & Johnstone, R. 1998. Sperm allocation in an uncertain world. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44: 161168.DOI: 10.1007/s002650050528
  • 13
    Holland, J. 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbour.
  • 14
    Maynard Smith, J. 1982. Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • 15
    Parker, G.A. 1982. Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes. J. Theor. Biol. 96: 281294.
  • 16
    Parker, G.A. 1990. Sperm competition games: sneaks and extra-pair copulations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242: 127133.
  • 17
    Parker, G.A., Ball, M.A., Stockley, P. & Gage, M.J.G. 1996. Sperm competition games: individual assessment of sperm competition intensity by group spawners. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 12911297.
  • 18
    Parker, G.A., Ball, M.A., Stockley, P. & Gage, M.J.G. 1997. Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 17931802.
  • 19
    Parker, G.A., Simmons, L.W., Stockley, P., McChristie, D.M. & Charnov, E.L. 1999. Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: effects of female size and egg content. Anim. Behav. 57: 795805.DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1034
  • 20
    Pierce, J.D., Ferguson, B., Salo, A.L., Sawrey, D.K., Shapiro, L.E., Taylor, S.A. & Dewsbury, D.A. 1990. Patterns of sperm allocation across successive ejaculates in four species of voles (Microtus). J. Reprod. Fertil. 88: 141149.
  • 21
    Pitnick, S. & Markow, T.A. 1994. Male gametic strategies: sperm size, testes size, and the allocation of ejaculate among successive mates by the sperm-limited fly Drosophila pachea and its relatives. Am. Nat. 143: 785819.
  • 22
    Reinhold, K. & Heller, K.-G. 1993. The ultimate function of nuptial feeding in the bushcricket Poecilimon veluchianus (Orthoptera: Tettigonidae: Phaneropterinae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 5560.
  • 23
    Sakaluk, S.K. 1984. Male crickets feed females to ensure complete sperm transfer. Science 223: 609610.
  • 24
    Sakaluk, S.K. 1985. Spermatophore size and its role in the reproductive behaviour of the cricket, Gryllodes supplicans (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Can. J. Zool. 63: 16521656.
  • 25
    Sauer, K.P., Lubjuhn, T., Sindern, J., Kullmann, H., Kurtz, J., Epplen, C. & Epplen, J.T. 1998. Mating system and sexual selection in the scorpionfly Panorpa vulgaris (Mecoptera: Panorpidae). Naturwissenschaften 85: 219228.
  • 26
    Savalli, U.M. & Fox, C.W. 1999. The effect of male mating history on paternal investment, fecundity and female remating in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Funct. Ecol. 13: 169177.
  • 27
    Shapiro, D.Y., Marconato, A. & Yoshikawa, T. 1995. Sperm economy in a coral reef fish, Thalassoma bifasciatum. Ecology 75: 13341344.
  • 28
    Simmons, L.W., Craig, M., Llorens, T., Schinzig, M. & Hosken, D.J. 1993. Bushcricket spermatophores vary in accord with sperm competition and parental investment theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 251: 183186.
  • 29
    Simmons, L.W. & Kvarnemo, C. 1997. Ejaculate expenditure by male bushcrickets decreases with sperm competition intensity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 12031208.
  • 30
    Squires, E.L., Picket, B.W. & Amann, R.P. 1979. Effect of successive ejaculation on stallion seminal characteristics. J. Reprod. Fertil. 27: 712.
  • 31
    Sumida, B.H., Houston, A.I., McNamara, J.M. & Hamilton, W.D. 1990. Genetic algorithms and evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 147: 5984.
  • 32
    Svärd, L. & Wiklund, C. 1986. Different ejaculate delivery strategies in first versus subsequent matings in the swallowtail butterfly Papilio machaon L. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18: 325330.
  • 33
    Thornhill, R. 1983. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am. Nat. 122: 765788.
  • 34
    Toquenaga, Y. & Wade, M.J. 1996. Sewall Wright meets artificial life: the origin and maintenance of evolutionary novelty. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 478482.
  • 35
    Wedell, N. & Cook, P.A. 1999. Butterflies tailor their ejaculate in response to sperm competition risk and intensity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 10331039.