SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Blondel, J., Perret, P. & Maistre, M. 1990. On the genetical basis of the laying-date in an island population of blue tits. J. Evol. Biol. 3: 469475.
  • 2
    Brinkhof, M.W.G., Cavé, A.J., Hage, F.J. & Verhulst, S. 1993. Timing of reproduction in the coot Fulica atra: evidence for a causal relationship. J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 577587.
  • 3
    Crick, H.Q.P., Dudley, C., Glue, D.E. & Thomson, D.L. 1997. UK birds are laying eggs earlier. Nature 388: 526526.
  • 4
    Dunstan, F.D.J. 1993. Time series analysis. In: Biological Data Analysis: a Practical Approach (J. C. Fry, ed.), pp. 243–310. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • 5
    Falconer, D.S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, Harlow.
  • 6
    Findlay, C.S. & Cooke, F. 1982. Breeding synchrony in the lesser snow goose (anser-caerulescens-caerulescens) I. Genetic and environmental components of hatch date variability and their effects on hatch synchrony. Evolution 36: 342351.
  • 7
    Grant, P.R. & Grant, B.R. 1995. Predicting microevolutionary responses to directional selection on heritable variation. Evolution 49: 241251.
  • 8
    Greenwood, P.J., Harvey, P.H. & Perrins, C.M. 1979. The role of dispersal in the great tit (Parus major): the causes, consequences and heritability of natal dispersal. J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 123142.
  • 9
    Hochachka, W. 1990. Seasonal decline in reproductive-performance of song sparrows. Ecology 71: 12791288.
  • 10
    Horak, P. & Tammaru, T. 1996. Between-year variation in breeding conditions biases heritability estimates for body size in birds. Ardea 84: 127135.
  • 11
    Jones, P.J. 1973. Some Aspects of the Feeding Ecology of the Great tit Parus major. PhD Thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford.
  • 12
    Kearsey, M.J. & Pooni, H.S. 1996. The Genetical Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • 13
    Klomp, H. 1970. Clutch size in birds. Ardea 58: 1121.
  • 14
    Lack, D. 1966. Population Studies of Birds. Clarendon, Oxford.
  • 15
    Larsson, K., Van Der Jeugd, H.P., Van Der Veen, I.T. & Forslund, P. 1998. Body size declines despite positive directional selection on heritable size traits in a barnacle goose population. Evolution 52: 11691184.
  • 16
    Lessells, C. & Boag, P. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104: 116121.
  • 17
    Lewontin, R.C. 1974. The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. Am. J. Hum. General 26: 400411.
  • 18
    Magnussen, S. 1993. Bias in genetic variance estimates due to spatial autocorrelation. Theor. Appl. Genet 86: 349355.
  • 19
    McCleery, R.H. & Perrins, C.M. 1998. temperature and egg-laying trends. Nature 391: 3031.
  • 20
    Merilä, J. & Fry, J.D. 1998. Genetic variation and causes of genotype–environment interaction in the body size of blue tits (Parus caerluleus). Genetics 148: 12331244.
  • 21
    Merilä, J., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Sheldon, B.C. 2001a. Cryptic evolution in a wild bird population. Nature 412: 7679.
  • 22
    Merilä, J. & Sheldon, B.C. 2000. Lifetime reproductive success and heritability in nature. Am. Nat. 155: 301310.
  • 23
    Merilä, J. & Sheldon, B.C. 2001. Avian quantitative genetics. In: Current Ornithology 16 (V. Nolan & C. F. Thompson, eds), pp. 179–255. Plenum Press, New York.
  • 24
    Merilä, J., Sheldon, B.C. & Kruuk. 2001b. Explaining stasis: microevolutionary studies in natural populations. Genetica 112: 199222.
  • 25
    Nager, R.G., Keller, L.F. & Van Noordwijk, A.J. 2000. Understanding natural selection on traits that are influenced by environmental conditions. In: Adaptive Genetic Variation in the Wild (T. A. Mousseau, B. Sinervo & J. A. Endler, eds), pp. 95–115. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • 26
    Nager, R.G., Rüegger, C. & Van Noordwijk, A.J. 1997. Nutrient or energy limitation on egg formation: a feeding experiment in great tits. J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 495507.
  • 27
    Nager, R.G. & Van Noordwijk, A.J. 1995. Proximate and ultimate aspects of phenotypic plasticity in timing of great tit breeding an a heterogeneous environment. Am. Nat. 146: 454474.
  • 28
    Newton, I. & Marquiss, M. 1984. Seasonal trend in the breeding performance of Sparrowhawks. J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 809830.
  • 29
    Van Noordwijk, A.J., McCleery, R.H. & Perrins, C.M. 1995. Selection for the timing of great tit breeding in relation to caterpillar growth and temperature. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 451458.
  • 30
    Van Noordwijk, A.J., Van Balen, J.H. & Scharloo, W. 1981. Genetic variation in the timing of reproduction in the great tit. Oecologia 49: 158166.
  • 31
    Perdeck, A.C. & Cavé, A.J. 1992. Laying date in the coot: effects of age and mate choice. J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 1319.
  • 32
    Perrins, C.M. 1965. Population fluctuations and clutch-size in the great tit (Parus major). J. Anim. Ecol. 34: 601647.
  • 33
    Perrins, C.M. 1970. The timing of birds' breeding season. Ibis 112: 242255.
  • 34
    Perrins, C.M. 1979. British Tits. Collins, London.
  • 35
    Phillips, R.A. & Furness, R.W. 1998. Measurement of heritability of hatching date and chick condition in parasitic jaegers. Can. J. Zool. 76: 22902294.DOI: 10.1139/cjz-76-12-2290
  • 36
    Piertney, S.B., MacColl, A.D.C., Lambin, X., Moss, R. & Dallas, J.F. 1999. Spatial distribution of genetic relatedness in a moorland population of red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotticus). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68: 317331.
  • 37
    Pigliucci, M. 2001. Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  • 38
    Price, T.D., Kirkpatrick, M. & Arnold, S.J. 1988. Directional selection and the evolution of breeding date in birds. Science 240: 798799.
  • 39
    Przybylo, R., Sheldon, B.C. & Merilä, J. 2000. Climatic effects on breeding and morphology: evidence for phenotypic plasticity. J. Anim. Ecol. 69: 395403.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00401.x
  • 40
    Rausher, M.D. 1992. The measurement of selection on quantitative traits: biases due to the environmental covariances between traits and fitness. Evolution 46: 616626.
  • 41
    Rice, W.R. & Gaines, S.D. 1994. Extending nondirectional heterogeneity tests to evaluate simply ordered alternative hypotheses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 225226.
  • 42
    Svensson, E. 1997. Natural selection on avian breeding time: causality, fecundity-dependent, and fecundity-independent selection. Evolution 51: 12761283.
  • 43
    Svensson, E. & Nilsson, J.-Å. 1995. Food supply, territory quality and reproductive timing in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Ecology 76: 18041812.
  • 44
    Van Tienderen, P.H. & De Jong, G.J. 1994. A general model of the relation between phenotypic selection and genetic response. J. Evol. Biol. 7: 112.
  • 45
    Verhulst, S., Van Balen, J.H. & Tinbergen, J.M. 1995. Seasonal decline in reproductive success of the great tit – variation in time or quality? Ecology 76: 23922403.
  • 46
    Visser, M.E. & Holleman, L.J.M. 2001. Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 289294.
  • 47
    Wiggins, D.A. 1991. Natural selection on body size and laying date in the tree swallow. Evolution 45: 11691174.